Little et al. v. Barreme et al.
The Court affirmed damages against a naval commander for a seizure outside the authority Congress granted. Presidential instructions did not legalize the otherwise unlawful seizure.
collection
Founding-era declarations, constitutional drafts and amendments, early federal statutes and court decisions, and later federal records. Drafts, adopted texts, reported speeches and later orders retain their separate source identities and limitations.
Open a record to inspect the available source files, publication details and citation. Compare the original document with its description, and use the full-library search to include records filed in smaller subcollections. Dates identify the source or event described; they do not by themselves verify every claim in a document.
This page organizes sources. Descriptions and connections are research annotations, not a substitute for the underlying evidence.
Up to 50 sources, including nested collections or subjects. Search the full set →
The Court affirmed damages against a naval commander for a seizure outside the authority Congress granted. Presidential instructions did not legalize the otherwise unlawful seizure.
The opinion explains constitutional supremacy, judicial review, and the force of constitutional oaths. It distinguishes legally prescribed official duties affecting individual rights from discretionary political acts.
Section 21 supplies a concrete founding-era example of criminal accountability: it punishes bribing federal judges and judicial acceptance of bribes, with fines, imprisonment and disqualification from federal office u...
The act requires judicial oaths consistent with the Constitution and laws, creates duties and bonds for court officers, and establishes federal judicial machinery.
The first statute enacted under the Constitution prescribes the oath or affirmation to support the Constitution and regulates its administration to federal and state officeholders.
The committee report records an intermediate formulation of warrant protections during the drafting of the Bill of Rights.
Madison proposes constitutional safeguards against abuses of power, including protection from unreasonable searches and warrants lacking probable cause, oath, or particularity, and explains courts’ role in protecting ...
Hamilton argues that delegated authority cannot validly exceed its commission and that courts must prefer the Constitution when legislation irreconcilably conflicts with it.
The surviving draft supplies manuscript evidence for the development of Virginia’s declaration before the convention adopted its revised text.
Section 2 makes magistrates the people’s trustees and servants, answerable to them. Section 7 rejects suspension of laws without representative consent. Section 10 condemns general warrants lacking supporting evidence...
The preamble identifies prevention of misconstruction or abuse of governmental power as a purpose of the amendments. The search-and-seizure provision requires probable cause, oath or affirmation, and particular descri...
The founding constitutional text establishes federal powers and limits. Article VI binds state judges to the Constitution and federal laws made pursuant to it, and requires specified federal and state officeholders to...
Complete Executive Order 10027 from page 107, including signature, date and filing line. Full 12-page issue preserved separately; other rules, notices and tables not transcribed.