Preserved archival file — little-barreme-original-report.pdf
Unmodified archival response body from https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep006/usrep006170/usrep006170.pdf
PDF · 0.4 MB
Download ↓
1804-02-27 (opinion delivered)
The Court affirmed damages against a naval commander for a seizure outside the authority Congress granted. Presidential instructions did not legalize the otherwise unlawful seizure.
Printed pages 176–179; particularly 178–179 on whether executive orders excuse the officer. March 12, 1799 instructions reproduced at pages 171–172. A civil damages decision arising from statutory limits on maritime seizure, not a criminal conviction or a general holding that doubt alone makes government conduct unconstitutional. The report’s headnote is separate from Marshall’s opinion. Archival links: Original report scan: https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep006/usrep006170/usrep006170.pdf
Archival identity, document boundaries and provenance reviewed; generated text PDF pages visually checked for layout and continuous source coverage. No independent human proofreading. Complete ten-page report scan covering 6 U.S. 170–179. The first page includes the end of a preceding case. Embedded OCR is imperfect and retained as supplied; the original page images are authoritative.
View reference catalogue / source ↗Unmodified archival response body from https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep006/usrep006170/usrep006170.pdf
PDF · 0.4 MB
Download ↓Library of Congress, Law Library, U.S. Reports collection. Digitized printed report, Cranch volume 2; the opinion starts at printed page 176. The report also reproduces the executive instructions and lower-court proceedings.
Historical primary texts are public domain. Source institutions credited separately. Modern editorial annotations are not licensed for republication by this record.
Technical archive record ↓