READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE

Okaloosa County BOCC — May 6, 2014 — reading text

Part 3 of 49. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.

Machine-extracted text — 01-Agenda Packet.pdf

Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed

Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.

Historical Data: None Wetlands: Uplands & Wetlands Water and Sewer: AyWS Within 3 mile of an Airport: NO Packet Pg. 19 ATTACHMENT - H 29-4N-23-0000-0002-0000/0016-0000/0020 RUBY RDG LAKE SILVER RD SUBJECT PROPERTY RR R-1 CURRIE RD DORCHESTER PL HACIENDA LN PAIGE LN PADDOCK CI R R-1 Legend : R-1 RR Proposed Zoning Map Packet Pg. 20 ATTACHMENT - I 29-4N-23-0000-0002-0000/0016-0000/0020 FLASH LN MAGIK DR AG LAKE SILVER RD CRICKET LN TA RUBY RDG YL OR RD DOGWOOD DR W RR HALFMOON LN SUBJECT PROPERTY LDR ORD#: 1210 BLUEBERRY LN From: RR OAK HILL RD CURRIE RD DORCHESTER PL TRESTLE ST LDR LDR LDR ORD#: 585 ORD#: 9726 ORD#: 9725 From: RR From: RLDR From: && RLDR MUMU LINENE DR MILL RUN DR R CI K DOC D PA MU ORD#: 317 LDR D From: LDR & UMU RR N E MU IL TY MU MU ORD#: 628 CRESTVIEW PH ORD#: ORD#: From: 685 LDR 825 From: From: LDRUMU MCDAVID RD Legend : RR 1 Mile FLU Map MU LDR Packet Pg. 21 ATTACHMENT - J 29-4N-23-0000-0002-0000/0016-0000/0020 FLASH LN BULLET DR EQUINE DR MAGIK DR AA LAKE SILVER RD RUBY RDG SUBJECT PROPERTY RR W DOGWOOD DR TAYLOR RD R-1 ORD#: 1211 BLUEBERRY LN From: RR CURRIE RD BUD MOULTON RD DORCHESTER PL TRESTLE ST OAK HILL RD LINENE DR R CI C K DDO PA R-1 R RD YNE 85 N MU L T CRESTVIEW PHI H WY MCDAVID RD Legend : RR AA 1 Mile Zoning Map R-1 MU Packet Pg. 22 EXHIBIT 1 TYPE – 1 AMENDMENT GUIDELINES AND CRITERIA 1.15 Amendment guidelines and criteria: The Board of County Commissioners shall exercise its legislative authority when deciding whether or not to approve or not approve plan amendments. However, the following guidelines and criteria shall be considered when making such decision and may form the basis for approving or not approving any particular plan amendment. These shall only apply to Type-1 plan amendments. 1. All procedural requirements prescribed herein must be met. Response: All procedural requirements have been met. 2. The requested plan amendment must be consistent with the objectives and policies of this Plan, particularly the designation and location criteria specified in the Future Land Use Element. Response: The amendment site is located outside the urban development boundary, however, the location criteria for the LDR category allows it to be located both inside and outside the UDB. 3. The potential to create a threat to the general health, safety, and welfare of the public, or otherwise adversely affect the public interest. Response: The amendment in and of itself does not authorize development. Any development enabled by the amendment will be subject to the County’s development regulations which are intended to protect the public interest. 4. The extent to which any development enabled by the amendment will promote an orderly and logical pattern of development relative to the area involved, and can co-exist in relative proximity to other adjacent or nearby land uses in a stable fashion over time such that no other use or condition is unduly negatively impacted directly or indirectly by another use or condition, or will otherwise interfere with the quiet use and enjoyment of properties enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity of the amendment area. Response: Properties adjacent and proximate to the amendment site are shown on the FLUM as RR to the west and north, and LDR to the east and south. There are existing residential subdivisions in the immediate vicinity. Any adjacent farm operations must be buffered from a residential subdivision by a minimum 30 foot buffer as required by Future Land Use Element Policy 10.14A. 5. The amendment is intended to correct an oversight or mistake in the Plan or on the FLUM, or conditions and circumstances in the vicinity of the amendment area have changed to justify or give rise to a need for the amendment. Response: As stated by the applicant “The owners are proposing to develop the subject parcels, and their need for such an amendment is to provide the same Future Land Use Map Designation for these subject parcels as those developed parcels which are both adjacent to these parcels and within close

Download this text file with its original spacing ↓