READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Okaloosa County BOCC — May 6, 2014 — reading text
Part 3 of 49. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — 01-Agenda Packet.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
Historical Data: None
Wetlands: Uplands & Wetlands
Water and Sewer: AyWS
Within 3 mile of an Airport: NO
Packet Pg. 19
ATTACHMENT - H
29-4N-23-0000-0002-0000/0016-0000/0020
RUBY RDG
LAKE SILVER RD
SUBJECT PROPERTY
RR
R-1
CURRIE RD
DORCHESTER PL
HACIENDA LN
PAIGE LN
PADDOCK CI R
R-1
Legend
:
R-1
RR
Proposed Zoning Map
Packet Pg. 20
ATTACHMENT - I
29-4N-23-0000-0002-0000/0016-0000/0020
FLASH LN
MAGIK DR
AG
LAKE SILVER RD CRICKET LN
TA RUBY RDG
YL
OR
RD
DOGWOOD DR W
RR
HALFMOON LN
SUBJECT PROPERTY LDR
ORD#: 1210
BLUEBERRY LN
From: RR
OAK HILL RD
CURRIE RD
DORCHESTER PL
TRESTLE ST
LDR
LDR
LDR
ORD#: 585
ORD#: 9726
ORD#: 9725
From: RR
From: RLDR
From: &&
RLDR MUMU
LINENE DR
MILL RUN DR R
CI
K
DOC
D
PA
MU
ORD#: 317
LDR
D
From: LDR & UMU
RR
N E MU
IL TY MU MU
ORD#: 628
CRESTVIEW PH ORD#:
ORD#:
From: 685
LDR
825
From:
From: LDRUMU
MCDAVID RD
Legend
:
RR
1 Mile FLU Map
MU
LDR
Packet Pg. 21
ATTACHMENT - J
29-4N-23-0000-0002-0000/0016-0000/0020
FLASH LN
BULLET DR
EQUINE DR
MAGIK DR
AA
LAKE SILVER RD
RUBY RDG
SUBJECT PROPERTY
RR
W DOGWOOD DR
TAYLOR RD
R-1
ORD#: 1211
BLUEBERRY LN
From: RR
CURRIE RD
BUD MOULTON RD
DORCHESTER PL
TRESTLE ST
OAK HILL RD
LINENE DR
R
CI
C K
DDO
PA R-1
R RD
YNE
85 N
MU
L T
CRESTVIEW
PHI
H WY
MCDAVID RD
Legend
:
RR
AA
1 Mile Zoning Map
R-1
MU
Packet Pg. 22
EXHIBIT 1
TYPE – 1 AMENDMENT GUIDELINES AND CRITERIA
1.15 Amendment guidelines and criteria: The Board of County Commissioners shall exercise its
legislative authority when deciding whether or not to approve or not approve plan amendments.
However, the following guidelines and criteria shall be considered when making such decision and may
form the basis for approving or not approving any particular plan amendment. These shall only apply to
Type-1 plan amendments.
1. All procedural requirements prescribed herein must be met.
Response: All procedural requirements have been met.
2. The requested plan amendment must be consistent with the objectives and policies of this Plan,
particularly the designation and location criteria specified in the Future Land Use Element.
Response: The amendment site is located outside the urban development boundary, however, the
location criteria for the LDR category allows it to be located both inside and outside the UDB.
3. The potential to create a threat to the general health, safety, and welfare of the public, or otherwise
adversely affect the public interest.
Response: The amendment in and of itself does not authorize development. Any development enabled
by the amendment will be subject to the County’s development regulations which are intended to protect
the public interest.
4. The extent to which any development enabled by the amendment will promote an orderly and logical
pattern of development relative to the area involved, and can co-exist in relative proximity to other
adjacent or nearby land uses in a stable fashion over time such that no other use or condition is unduly
negatively impacted directly or indirectly by another use or condition, or will otherwise interfere with
the quiet use and enjoyment of properties enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity of the
amendment area.
Response: Properties adjacent and proximate to the amendment site are shown on the FLUM as RR to
the west and north, and LDR to the east and south. There are existing residential subdivisions in the
immediate vicinity. Any adjacent farm operations must be buffered from a residential subdivision by a
minimum 30 foot buffer as required by Future Land Use Element Policy 10.14A.
5. The amendment is intended to correct an oversight or mistake in the Plan or on the FLUM, or
conditions and circumstances in the vicinity of the amendment area have changed to justify or give rise
to a need for the amendment.
Response: As stated by the applicant “The owners are proposing to develop the subject parcels, and
their need for such an amendment is to provide the same Future Land Use Map Designation for these
subject parcels as those developed parcels which are both adjacent to these parcels and within close
