READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Okaloosa County BOCC — November 4, 2012 — Minutes — reading text
Part 3 of 5. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — 06-Minutes - Nov 20 2012.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
the county
needs it for drainage, Mr. Jennings will be required to remove
the fence. He advised that an alternate resolution has been
prepared, vacating a strip 20 feet in width rather than 25 feet.
This would provide an additional five feet for public use. Mr.
Hofstad added the only opposition to the vacation has been from
the Watts family.
Mr. Amunds opened the floor for public comment but no one came
forward to. speak. Mr. Harris made motion to approve the
vacation as requested by the Jennings.
Mr. Windes stated that he went on site Saturday and spoke with
both Mr. Jennings and Mr. Watts. He said there are no sidewalks
in this area and Mr. Watts wants to protect the children by
having ample space for them to walk in the neighborhood. Mr.
Windes stated Mr. Jennings said it would be acceptable to
decrease the width of the vacated right-of-way to 20 feet and
Mr. Watts, the neighbor, agreed to that as well.
Mr. Harris withdrew his motion. Mr. Windes made motion, to
adopt the alternate resolution, vacating a strip 20’x150’.
Mr. Parisot stated he went to the location on Sunday and it
appears to him there is already enough space for foot traffic
between where a fence would go and the shrubs. He stated the
property owner who received vacated right-of-way in the 1990s
did not give anything up. Mr. Windes noted that would be a
narrow and confined alleyway. Mr. Harris stated there appears
to be agreement between both parties and seconded Mr. Windes’
motion. Mr. Boyles felt Mr. Parisot’s comments were misplaced
regarding the portion which was previously vacated. He said it
is regrettable the previous right-of-way vacation in the 1990s
had no provision for public use but there is nothing which can
be done about that now. Mr. Boyles stated he is sympathetic to
the Jennings’ request but he is looking how that right-of-way
may have future use.
Mr. Amunds reopened the floor for public comments. Mr. Jennings
stated he is basically in a position of “winning 20 feet.” He
said Mr. Parisot and Mr. Windes were able to see the area first
November 20, 2012 -7- Minute Book 68, Page 52
Okaloosa County Board of County Commissioners
hand. Mr. Jennings said from where the flags were set to the
south there is sufficient distance for foot traffic and a
bicycle path. He stated his primary concern was the motorized
vehicles coming through.
The vote was taken on the motion---5 yeas.
RESOLUTION NO. 12-168
PUBLIC HEARING - AMENDING CHAPTERS 1A AND 2, LAND DEVELOPMENT
CODE (9:00 A.M.)
Mr. Stanford read the advertised legal notice for a public
hearing to consider changes to the Land Development Code (LDC)
Submitted by the Growth Management Department, amending Chapter
1A Code Administration and Chapter 2 Zoning Regulations. This
is the second hearing. The first hearing was held on
November 6, 2012 in Crestview.
Mr. Elliot Kampert, Growth Management Director, provided the
following staff findings:
e Section 1A.02.11 “Permits from Other Agencies.” A change
to this section is necessary in order to make the LDC
consistent with current state law. _ During the 2012
session, the Legislature enacted House Bill 503 which
amended Section 125.022, Florida Statutes. This provision
prohibits counties from requiring permit approvals from
other agencies as a prerequisite to issuing development
orders or permits. Currently, the LDC requires permit
approvals from other agencies before a development order
can be approved.
e The County substantially revised Chapter 2 “Zoning
Regulations” in May 2010. These revisions identified
permitted uses in commercial and industrial zoning
districts according to the North American = Industry
Classification Systems (NAICS) codes. This was done to
provide a more descriptive and inclusive list of permitted
uses based on the types of businesses identified in the
NAICS by the U.S. Census Bureau. The NAICS is the more
comprehensive and authoritative list of officially
recognized businesses in the county and it is updated every
five years as part of the Economic Census. The most recent
update is for 2012. As a result, staff took this
opportunity to re-evaluate NAICS codes in relation to those
currently listed in Chapter 2. The proposed changes are:
November 20, 2012 -8- Minute Book 68, Page 53
Okaloosa County Board of County Commissioners
o references to NAICS 2002 have been changed to NAICS
2012
o Section 2.08.00 Business Office (C-1) district has
been changed: Code 54, add “except 541940 Veterinary
Services with outside kennels or outside boarding of
animals;” Code 5611 through 5615 Administrative
Support Services, delete Code 5616 Investigative and
Security Services including armored cars and security
services; Code 6211 through 6213 Health Care and
Social Assistance, delete Codes 6214 through 6216
including outpatient care centers, medical labs, and
home health care services; Delete Code 928110 National
Security including military bases and training camps
o Section 2.10.00 General Commercial (C-3) district:
Add Code 23 Construction; Code 48-49 Transportation,
add warehousing, Air Transportation add 4831 Deep Sea,
coastal and Great Lakes Water Transportation, add 4881
Support activities for Air Transportation, add 4882
Support activities for rail transportation, add 4883
support activities for water transportation, and add
4879990 scenic and sightseeing, other. Code 53, add
“except 532411 commercial air, rail and water
transportation equipment rental and leasing.” Code 56,
add “and Waste Management and Remediation services
except 5622 Waste Treatment and Disposal.” Code 71,
add “except 7132 gambling industries (any gaming and
gambling prohibited by law) and 713990 (nudist camps
and outdoor shooting activities involving firearms
such as firing ranges, trap shoot skeet shoot only).
Code 92, add “except 922140 Correctional institutions
(state or federal).
o 2.10.7 Performance Criteria: 1(b) Noise, delete “not
exceed 55 dbA outside any enclosed structure or
building” and add “be as specified in Sections 9.01.00
and 9.02.00
o Section 2.12.00 Industrial (I-1): Delete 2(a), 2(b),
and 2(c); Delete Codes 5611, 5612 Administrative and
facilities support services and add Code 6115
Technical and Trade Schools, add Code 8113 Commercial
and Industrial Machinery and Equipment Repair and
Maintenance, add Code 92 Public Administration, add to
11 “and only when used to provide workforce housing
accessory to or in conjunction with a permitted
industrial use.”
November 20, 2012 -9- Minute Book 68, Page 54
Okaloosa County Board of County Commissioners
Oo Section 2.13.00 Airport Industrial Park (I-2): add 12
Aerial scenic and sightseeing such as cable cars,
gliders, helicopter rides and hot air balloon rides.
Ms. Virginia Hickman stated she lives in East Pass Towers and
represents a number of residents. She complained about the use
of a barge near the front of this property being used for
helicopters landings. Ms. Hickman was concerned about the small
boat traffic in the area. She also said she is unable to sit on
the balcony because of the noise from the helicopters.
Ms. Hickman said it was her understanding there was a moratorium
on these type operations and asked how the helicopter company
can do this. Mr. Amunds replied the county does not regulate
the waterways. He explained the provisions of the Land
Development Code do not cover the water. Mr. Dowd added that he
is currently researching the issue to see what can be done.
Mr. David Powell, attorney with the Ward & Ketchersid Law Firm
and representing Timberview Helicopter and Destin Helicopter,
stated his clients don’t want to land on barges. He said they
want a place to do business and the airport is not feasible.
Mr. Powell stated the site previously used by his clients did
not require a development order because they were not developing
anything and under the C-3 Zoning their helicopter operation was
an accepted use. Subsequently, Mr. Powell said they found
themselves going to the county when FDOT required approval from
the county. He pointed out they were using a temporary permit
at that time. Mr. Powell said Timberview was making application
when the moratorium was adopted by the Board. He stated his
clients had no prior notice the moratorium ordinance would be
adopted on an emergency basis on June 19. Mr. Powell commented
“They were told not to apply.” Mr. Amunds asked for
Clarification on who told Timberview not to apply. Mr. Powell
replied, “Let me think how they phrased it.”
Mr. Harris asked Mr. Powell if he is saying when his clients
went to FDOT they were told to go the county for a permit. Mr.
Powell answered that he has not spoken with FDOT directly but
did see a letter from FDOT requiring local zoning approval. Mr.
Kampert noted that is no longer a requirement in Section lA.
The new requirement is to comply with other agencies for permits
and the county cannot predicate a permit on other agencies.
Mr. Parisot referred to Judge Remington’s order of July 30 which
stated that neither of the plaintiffs submitted an application.
November 20, 2012 -10- Minute Book 68, Page 55
Okaloosa County Board of County Commissioners
The application was made by the owner of Destin Commons. Mr.
Powell confirmed that the landowner did file. He also advised
the court case referenced by Mr. Parisot is not his lawsuit.
Continuing, Mr. Powell stated his clients were caught in “no
man’s land” with FDOT and then could not file when the
moratorium was adopted. He advised that FDOT read this
conservatively and told his clients FDOT could not approve the
permit request. Mr. Powell asked why there are no moratoriums
on any other proposed changes. He said the only opportunity his
clients may have to file is in the “gap” between the effective
date of the moratorium and the effective date of the proposed
ordinance.
Upon inquiry by Mr. Harris, Mr. Powell said his clients were
flying from a C-3 parcel at the time of the moratorium. Mr.
Parisot noted they were flying out of the Destin Commons parking
lot. Mr. Powell stated the other company (competitor) was
developing raw land and received approval during a public
hearing. He said they will have protection under the current
code.
Mr. Dowd stated Mr. Powell’s clients were parties in the lawsuit
referenced by Mr. Parisot earlier and in that lawsuit’ the
grandfathering-in issue was addressed. Mr. Parisot said the
judge’s order clarified the issue and there was no application
for permanent relief.
Mr. Windes stated he spoke with FDOT’s Airport Regional Manager
on public and private airports. He detailed the information
provided to him about the 14 facilities in the region. Mr.
Windes said between the court case and the information he
obtained, it appears there has been a lack of effort on the part
of these businesses to qualify and follow the proper procedures.
Mr. Dowd noted the issue before the Board is not about
helicopter operations but about amending the Land Development
Code. He said there could be a “window” for application if the
board agrees to that provision. Mr. Windes replied that he has
concerns about that provision which would allow anyone in after
all that has taken place. He pointed out this has already been
to court and been denied.
Mr. Windes stated this iS an important issue for the Destin
area. He said it affects the people who live here and
diminishes “our product.” Mr. Windes asked who will protect our
November 20, 2012 -11- Minute Book 68, Page 56
Okaloosa County Board of County Commissioners
people if the Board does not. Mr. Windes made motion to approve
the proposed amendments to the LDC.
Mr. Harris said he will play the devil’s advocate for a moment.
He said previously helicopter sightseeing operations were
allowed in a C-3 zone but the proposed changes will not allow
them. Mr. Kampert confirmed that C-3 did allow helicopter
Sightseeing businesses. Mr. Harris said both Timberview and
Destin Helicopter did what was allowed at the time. He also
asked the question how
