READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Okaloosa County BOCC — January 5, 2016 — DBE PROGRAM Jan 2016 Revisions — reading text
Part 17 of 21. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
DBE PROGRAM Jan 2016 Revisions — extracted reading text
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Known limitations
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
commitment to using the ineligible firm, or you have
made a commitment to using a DBE prime contractor, but a subcontract or contract has
not been executed before you issue the decertification notice provided for in paragraph
(g) of this section, the ineligible firm does not count toward the contract goal or overall
goal. You must direct the prime contractor to meet the contract goal with an eligible DBE
firm or demonstrate to you that it has made a good faith effort to do so.
2. If a prime contractor has executed a subcontract with the firm before you have notified
the firm of its ineligibility, the prime contractor may continue to use the firm on the contract
and may continue to receive credit toward its DBE goal for the firm's work. In this case,
or in a case where you have let a prime contract to the DBE that was later ruled ineligible,
the portion of the ineligible firm's performance of the contract remaining after you issued
the notice of its ineligibility shall not count toward your overall goal, but may count toward
the contract goal.
3. Exception: If the DBE's ineligibility is caused solely by its having exceeded the size
standard during the performance of the contract, you may continue to count its
participation on that contract toward overall and contract goals.
j. Availability of appeal. When you make an administratively final removal of a firm's eligibility under
this section, the firm may appeal the removal to the Department under §26.89.
§26.89 What is the process for certification appeals to the Department of Transportation?
a.
1. If you are a firm which is denied certification or whose eligibility is removed by a recipient,
you may make an administrative appeal to the Department.
2. If you are a complainant in an ineligibility complaint to a recipient (including the concerned
operating administration in the circumstances provided in §26.87(c)), you may appeal to
the Department if the recipient does not find reasonable cause to propose removing the
firm's eligibility or, following a removal of eligibility proceeding, determines that the firm is
eligible.
3. Send appeals to the following address: Department of Transportation, Office of Civil
Rights, 400 7th Street, SW, Room 5414, Washington, DC 20590.
b. Pending the Department's decision in the matter, the recipient's decision remains in effect. The
Department does not stay the effect of the recipient's decision while it is considering an appeal.
c. If you want to file an appeal, you must send a letter to the Department within 90 days of the date
of the recipient's final decision, including information and arguments concerning why the
recipient's decision should be reversed. The Department may accept an appeal filed later than
90 days after the date of the decision if the Department determines that there was good cause
for the late filing of the appeal.
1. If you are an appellant who is a firm which has been denied certification, whose
certification has been removed, whose owner is determined not to be a member of a
designated disadvantaged group, or concerning whose owner the presumption of
disadvantage has been rebutted, your letter must state the name and address of any
other recipient which currently certifies the firm, which has rejected an application for
certification from the firm or removed the firm's eligibility within one year prior to the date
of the appeal, or before which an application for certification or a removal of eligibility is
pending. Failure to provide this information may be deemed a failure to cooperate under
§26.109(c).
2. If you are an appellant other than one described in paragraph (c)(1) of this section, the
Department will request, and the firm whose certification has been questioned shall
promptly provide, the information called for in paragraph (c)(1) of this section. Failure to
provide this information may be deemed a failure to cooperate under §26.109(c).
d. When it receives an appeal, the Department requests a copy of the recipient's complete
administrative record in the matter. If you are the recipient, you must provide the administrative
record, including a hearing transcript, within 20 days of the Department's request. The
Department may extend this time period on the basis of a recipient's showing of good cause. To
facilitate the Department's review of a recipient's decision, you must ensure that such
administrative records are well organized, indexed, and paginated. Records that do not comport
with these requirements are not acceptable and will be returned to you to be corrected
immediately. If an appeal is brought concerning one recipient's certification decision concerning
a firm, and that recipient relied on the decision and/or administrative record of another recipient,
this requirement applies to both recipients involved.
e. The Department makes its decision based solely on the entire administrative record. The
Department does not make a de novo review of the matter and does not conduct a hearing. The
Department may supplement the administrative record by adding relevant information made
available by the DOT Office of Inspector General; Federal, state, or local law enforcement
authorities; officials of a DOT operating administration or other appropriate DOT office; a
recipient; or a firm or other private party.
f. As a recipient, when you provide supplementary information to the Department, you shall also
make this information available to the firm and any third-party complainant involved, consistent
with Federal or applicable state laws concerning freedom of information and privacy. The
Department makes available, on request by the firm and any third-party complainant involved,
any supplementary information it receives from any source.
1. The Department affirms your decision unless it determines, based on the entire
administrative record, that your decision is unsupported by substantial evidence or
inconsistent with the substantive or procedural provisions of this part concerning
certification.
2. If the Department determines, after reviewing the entire administrative record, that your
decision was unsupported by substantial evidence or inconsistent with the substantive or
procedural provisions of this part concerning certification, the Department reverses your
decision and directs you to certify the firm or remove its eligibility, as appropriate. You
must take the action directed by the Department's decision immediately upon receiving
written notice of it.
3. The Department is not required to reverse your decision if the Department determines
that a procedural error did not result in fundamental unfairness to the appellant or
substantially prejudice the opportunity of the appellant to present its case.
4. If it appears that the record is incomplete or unclear with respect to matters likely to have
a significant impact on the outcome of the case, the Department may remand the record
to you with instructions seeking clarification or augmentation of the record before making
a finding. The Department may also remand a case to you for further proceedings
consistent with Department instructions concerning the proper application of the
provisions of this part.
5. The Department does not uphold your decision based on grounds not specified in your
decision.
6. The Department's decision is based on the status and circumstances of the firm as of the
date of the decision being appealed.
7. The Department provides written notice of its decision to you, the firm, and the
complainant in an ineligibility complaint. A copy of the notice is also sent to any other
recipient whose administrative record or decision has been involved in the proceeding
(see paragraph (d) of this section). The notice includes the reasons for the Department's
decision, including specific references to the evidence in the record that supports each
reason for the decision.
8. The Department's policy is to make its decision within 180 days of receiving the complete
administrative record. If the Department does not make its decision within this period, the
Department provides written notice to concerned parties, including a statement of the
reason for the delay and a date by which the appeal decision will be made.
g. All decisions under this section are administratively final, and are not subject to petitions for
reconsideration.
[64 FR 5126, Feb. 2, 1999, as amended at 65 FR 68951, Nov. 15, 2000]
§26.91 What actions do recipients take following DOT certification appeal decisions?
a. If you are the recipient from whose action an appeal under §26.89 is taken, the decision is binding.
It is not binding on other recipients.
b. If you are a recipient to which a DOT determination under §26.89 is applicable, you must take the
following action:
1. If the Department determines that you erroneously certified a firm, you must remove the
firm's eligibility on receipt of the determination, without further proceedings on your part.
Effective on the date of your receipt of the Department's determination, the
consequences of a removal of eligibility set forth in §26.87(i) take effect.
2. If the Department determines that you erroneously failed to find reasonable cause to
remove the firm's eligibility, you must expeditiously commence a proceeding to determine
whether the firm's eligibility should be removed, as provided in §26.87.
3. If the Department determines that you erroneously declined to certify or removed the
eligibility of the firm, you must certify the firm, effective on the date of your receipt of the
written notice of Department's determination.
4. If the Department determines that you erroneously determined that the presumption of
social and economic disadvantage either should or should not be deemed rebutted, you
must take appropriate corrective action as determined by the Department.
5. If the Department affirms your determination, no further action is necessary.
c. Where DOT has upheld your denial of certification to or removal of eligibility from a firm, or
directed the removal of a firm's eligibility, other recipients with whom the firm is certified may
commence a proceeding to remove the firm's eligibility under §26.87. Such recipients must not
remove the firm's eligibility absent such a proceeding. Where DOT has reversed your denial of
certification to or removal of eligibility from a firm, other recipients must take the DOT action into
account in any certification action involving the firm.
