READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
The Raven — Harper & Brothers edition illustrated by Gustave Doré — reading text
Part 1 of 4. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — edgar-allan-poe-the-raven-gustave-dore-1884-complete-book.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
eS
ra ; pao
ey Bie ss
rina ™ mn Hie it — «mM Ng De
a
-PHE+BAVET EY
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS,
Chay. Copyright Do.
A
Shelf__~
UNITED STATES OF Am
THE RAVEN.
i
THE RAVEN
BY ILLUSTRATED
EDGAR ALLAN POE By GUSTAVE DORE
WITH COMMENT BY EDMUND C. STEDMAN
DON
{tet 12-1883; }
Keren
NEW YORK
HARPER & BROTHERS, PUBLISHERS, FRANKLIN SQUARE
1834.
Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1883, by
HARPER & BROTHERS,
In the Office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington.
AUl rights reserved,
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
With Names or ENGRAVERS
Title-page, designed by Elihu Vedder. . : . . ; Frederich Fuengling
* Nevermore.” a 4 . <
5 ; H, Claudius, G. ¥. Buechner.
1. Claudius.
“Once upon a midnight dreary, while I pondered, weak and weary,
Over many a quaint and curious volume of forgotten lore.” . 5 ; - . RA, Muller.
Ah, distinctly I remember, it was in the bleak December,
And each separate dying ember wrought its ghost upon the floor.” é : : R.G. Tietze.
“Eagerly I wished the morrow; vainly I had sought to borrow
From my books surcease of sorrow—sorrow for the lost Lenore.” . Bs . A. Claudius.
Sorrow for the lost Lenore.” , 4 * . 5 ‘ . W. Zimmermann.
For the rare and radiant maiden whom the angels name Lenore—
Nameless here for evermore. ° 7 a . Frederick Fuengli
“OT is some visitor entreating entrance at my chamber door—
Some late visitor entreating entrance at my chamber door.” : g rf . WW. Zimmermann.
—“Here I opened wide the door;—
Darkness there, and nothing more.” . . ; Y , 5 j H. Claudius.
“Doubting, dreaming dreams no mortal ever dared to dream before. 5 ° , ES. King.
“Surely? said I, ‘surely that is something at my window lattice;
Let me see, then, what thereat is, and this mystery explore.” : . , Frederick Fuengli:
“Open here I flung the shutter.” Johnson.
—*A stately Raven of the saintly days of yore.
nade he; not a minute stopped or stayed he.
Not the least obeisance
above my chamber door
Perched, and sat, and nothing more.”
“Perched upon a bust of Pall
“Wandering from the Nightly shore.” .
have flown before-
“Till I scarcely more than muttered, ‘Other fr
On the morrow Ae will leave me,as my hopes have flown before.
betook myself to linking
ht gloating o’er
nevermore |”
“‘Wretch, I cried, ‘thy God hath lent thee—by these
respite and nepenthe from thy memories of Lenore
Respit
“On this home by Horror haunted.
“‘Tell me truly, I implore—
Is there—ds there balm in Gilead ?—tell me—tell me, I implore!”
“*Tell this soul with sorrow laden if, within the distai
Aidenn,
It shall cl ted maiden whom the angels name L
“«Be that word our sign of parting, bird or fiend!’ I shrieked, upstarting.”
et thee back into the tempest and the Night’s Plutonian shore!”
“And my soul from out that shadow th
lies floating on the floor
be liftel—nevermore
The secret of the Sphinx.
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS.
ngels he hath sent thee
R. Staudentaur.
R. G. Tietze.
Frederick Fuengling.
Frank French.
R. Schelling.
George Keruell,
Victor Bernstrom.
R., Staudenbaur.
W. Zimmermann.
ES. King.
W. Zimmermann.
Robert Hoskin.
R. G. Tietze.
R. Staudenbaur.
COMMENT ON THE POEM.
COMMENT
HE secret of a poem, no less than a jest’s
prosperity, lies in the ear of him that hears
it. Yield to its spell, accept the poet's
mood: this, after all, is what the sages answer
when you ask them of its value. Even though
the poet himself, in his other mood, tell you that
his art is but sleight of hand, his food enchanter’s
food, and offer to show you the trick of it,—believe
him not. Wait for his prophetic hour; then give
yourself to his passion, his joy or pain. | We are
in Love’s hand to-day!” sings Gautier, in Swin-
burne's buoyant paraphrase,—and from morn to
sunset we are wafted on the violet sea: there is
but one love, one May, one flowery strand. Love
is eternal, all else unreal and put aside. The vision
has an end, the scene changes; but we have gained
something, the memory of a charm. ) As many poets,
so many charms. There is the charm of Evanes-
cence, that which lends to supreme beauty and
grace an aureole of Pathos. Share with Landor
his one “night of memories and of sighs” for Rose
Aylmer, and you have this to the full
And now take the hand of a new-world min-
strel, strayed from some proper habitat to that rude
and dissonant America which, as Baudelaire saw,
“was for Poe only a vast prison through which he |
ran, hither and thither, with the feverish agitation of
a being created to breathe in a purer world,” and
where “‘his interior life, spiritual as a poet, spiritual
even as a drunkard, was but one perpetual effort to
escape the influence of this antipathetical atmos-
phere.” Clasp the sensitive hand of a troubled
singer dreeing thus his weird, and share with him
the clime in which he found,—never throughout
the day, always in the night—if not the Atlantis
whence he had wandered, at least a place of refuge
from the bounds in which by day he was immured.
To one land only he has power to lead you,
and for one night only can you share his dream
A tract of neither Earth nor Heaven: “ No-man’s-
land,” out of Space, out of Time. Here are the
perturbed ones, through whose eyes, like those of
the Cenci, the soul finds windows though the mind
is dazed; here spirits, groping for the path which
ON THE
POEM.
moonlight uncertainties, all lost loves and illusions.
Here some are fixed in trance, the only respite
attainable ; others
“move fantastically
To a discordant melody
while everywhere are
heeted Memories of the Past—
Shrouded forms that start and sigh
As they pass the wanderer by.”
Such is the land, and for one night we enter
it,—a night of astral phases and recurrent chimes.
Its monodies are twelve poems, whose music strives
to change yet ever is the same. One by one they
sound, like the chiming of the brazen and ebony
clock, in “The Masque of the Red Death,” which
made the waltzers pause with ‘“disconcert and
tremulousness and meditation,” as often as the hour
ne round.
Of all these mystical cadences, the plaint of
The Raven, vibrating through the portal, chiefly
has impressed the outer world. (What things go to
the making of a poem,—and how true in this, as
in most else, that race which named its bards “the
makers”! A work is called out of the void. Where
| there was nothing, it remains,—a new creation, part
leads to Eternity, are halted and delayed. It is |
the limbo of “planetary souls,” wherein are all |
of the treasure of mankind. And a few exceptional
lyrics, more than others that are equally creative,
compel us to think anew how bravely the poet's
pen turns things unknown
“to shapes, and gives to airy nothing
A local habitation, and a name.”
Each seems without a prototype, yet all fascinate
us with elements wrested from the shadow of the
Supernatural. Now the highest imagination is con-
cerned about the soul of things; it may or may not
inspire the Fantasy that peoples with images the
interlunar vague. ‘Still, one of these lyrics, in its
smaller way, affects us with a sense of uniqueness,
as surely as the sublimer works of a supernatural
cast,— Marlowe's “ Faustus,” the “ Faust” of Goethe,
“Manfred,” or even those ethereal masterpieces,
The Tempest” and “A Midsummer Night's Dream.”
More than one, while otherwise unique, has some
burden or refrain which haunts the memory,—once |
heard, never forgotten, like the tone of a rarely used
but distinctive organ-stop. Notable among them is |
Burger's “Lenore,” that ghostly and resonant bal-
lad, the lure and foil of the translators. Few will
deny that Coleridge's wondrous “Rime of the An-
cient Mariner” stands at their very head. “Le
Juif-Errant” would have claims, had Beranger been
a greater poet; and, but for their remoteness from |
popular sympathy, “The Lady of Shalott” and |
“The Blessed Damozel” might be added to the
list. It was given to Edgar Allan Poe to produce
two lyrics, “The Bells” and Zhe Raven, each of
which, although perhaps of less beauty than those
of Tennyson and Rossetti, is a unique. “ Ulalume,”
while equally strange and imaginative, has not the
universal quality that is a portion of our test,
The Raven in sheer poetical constituents falls
below such pieces as “The Haunted Palace,” “The |
city in the Sea,” “The Sleeper,” and “‘Israfel
The whole of it would be exchanged, I suspect, by
readers of a fastidious cast, for such passages as |
these:
“Around, by lifting winds forgot,
Resignedly beneath the sky
The melancholy waters lie.
No rays from the holy heaven come down
On the long night-time of that town;
But light from out the lurid sea
Streams up the turrets silently—
Up many and many a marvellous shrine
Whose wreathéd friezes intertwine
The viol, the violet, and the vine.
No swellings tell that winds may be
Upon some far-off happier sea—
No heavings hint that winds have been
On seas less hideously serene.”
It lacks the aerial melody of the poet whose heart-
strings are a lute:
“And they say (the starry choir
And the other listening things)
That Israfeli’s fire
Is owing to that lyre
By which he sits and sings
‘The trembling living wire
Of those unusual strings.”
But Zhe Raven, like “The Bells” and “Annabel
Lee,” commends itself to the many and the few
I have said elsewhere that Poe's rarer productions
seemed to me “those in which there is the appear-
ance, at least, of spontaneity,—in which he yields
to his feelings, while dying falls and cadences most
musical, most melancholy, come from him una- |
COMMENT ON THE POEM.
| all or all in all.” And thu:
wares.” This is still my belief; and yet, upon a
fresh study of this poem, it impresses me more
than at any time since my boyhood. Close ac-
quaintance tells in favor of every true work of art.
Induce the man, who neither knows art nor cares
for it, to examine some poem or painting, and how
soon its force takes hold of him! In fact, he will
overrate the relative value of the first good work
by which his attention has been fairly caught. he
Raven, also, has consistent qualities which even an
expert must admire. In no other of its author's
poems is the motive more palpably defined. “The
Haunted Palace” is just as definite to the select
reader, but Poe scarcely would have taken that
subtle allegory for bald analysis. ie Raven is
wholly occupied with the author's typical theme—
the irretrievable loss of an idolized and beautiful
woman; but on other grounds, also, the public in-
stinct is correct in thinking it his representative
poem.
A man of genius usually gains a footing with
the success of some one effort, and this not always
his greatest. Recognition is the more instant for
having been postponed. He does not acquire it,
like a miser’s fortune, coin after coin, but “not at
with other ambitions:
the courtier, soldier, actor,—whatever their parts,—
each counts his triumph from some lucky stroke.
Poe's Raven, despite augury, was for him “the
bird that made the breeze to blow.” The poet
settled in New-York, in the winter of 1844—'45,
finding work upon Willis's paper, “The Evening
Mirror,” and eking out his income by contributions
elsewhere. For six years he had been an active
writer, and enjoyed a professional reputation; was
held in both respect and misdoubt, and was at no loss
for his share of the ill-paid journalism of that day.
He also had done much of his very best work,—
such tales as “ Ligeia” and “ The Fall of the House
of Usher,” (the latter containing that mystical coun-
terpart, in verse, of Elihu Vedder's “A Lost Mind,”)
such analytic feats as “The Gold Bug” and “ The
Mystery of Marie Roget.” He had made prose-
lytes abroad, and gained a lasting hold upon the
French mind. He had learned his own power and
weakness, and was at his prime, and not without a
certain reputation. But he had written nothing that
was on the tongue of everybody. To rare and del-
icate work some popular touch must be added to
capture the general audience of one’s own time.
Through the
