READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Okaloosa County BOCC — December 1, 2015 — 8) Addendum 2 — reading text
Part 2 of 2. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
8) Addendum 2 — extracted reading text
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Known limitations
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
and will be addressed in a future addendum.
Q: Section 2.2.1.2 – The surface aerator table a. Please advise what design context the
DCP intends for “max”, “avg high”, “avg”, and “min”. Are these absolute maximums and
minimums and the average? Are these peaking factors for oxygen demand? Please qualify
what conditions are intended for each of the four categories.
A: Refer to response noted in the above Procurement Documents – Volume II DCP section
of this Addendum pertaining to modifications/deletions/clarifications made to this section
26. Q: Section 2.2.2.1. How can the DCP criteria of 1,200 gpd/ft2 at 37.5 mgd with one clarifier
out of service be met with a third clarifier of equal size to the first two?
A: Refer to response noted in the above Procurement Documents – Volume II DCP section
of this Addendum pertaining to modifications/deletions/clarifications made to this section
27. Q: Paragraph 4.3.1.2 – Are the “8½-inches by 11-inches or 11-inches by 17-inches
graphics” included in the 8 page limit for the Executive Summary? Also, we assume that the
required Project CPM schedule is not included in the page limit 8 page limit…please verify.
A. Confirmed, all information shall be included within the 8 page limit, except for the Project
CPM Schedule.
28. Q; 2.13.1 2 Our Professional Liability is with a carrier not licensed (but authorized) to do
business in Florida. Is this acceptable.
A: This information is currently being reviewed and will be addressed in a future addendum.
29. Q: 2.13.1.7 The only way to provide insurance as required in section 2.13.1.7 is to provide a
“Project Specific” Insurance policy. Is this what you want?
A: This information is currently being reviewed and will be addressed in a future addendum.
30. Q: 2.13.1.8 Certified copies of policies are generally no longer provided. An “uncertified”
copy of the policy could be provided at your discretion, will this be acceptable.
ADDENDUM NO. 2
Project No. 100557 Revised: 4/26/2015
5
ARBENNIE PRITCHETT WRF EXPANSION DESIGN-BUILD PROJECT
A: This information is currently being reviewed and will be addressed in a future addendum.
31. Q: 2.13.3.2 Contractual Liability and Broad Form Property Damage (BFPD) are not specific
coverages that are specified in any policy. Please specifically define what you require. BFPD
was eliminated in 1986 and largely incorporated in to standard policies please specify exactly
what you want.
A: This information is currently being reviewed and will be addressed in a future addendum.
32. Q: 2.13.3.4 “Independent Respondent’s Liability” is not generally provided – if you require
this insurance a “project specific “policy will have to be provided. Is this what you want?
A: This information is currently being reviewed and will be addressed in a future addendum.
33. Q: Please provide submittal and requisition information for the existing Dewatering
Centrifuge.
A: These documents have been uploaded to the “W-Drive”.
34. Please provide submittal and requisition information for the existing Rotary Drum Thickener.
A: These documents have been uploaded to the “W-Drive”.
All Document Holders shall acknowledge receipt and acceptance of Addendum No. 1 in the
Proposal or by submitting the executed Addendum to Constantine Engineering prior to Proposal
Submittal.
Constantine Engineering
//Signed//
Joey G. Crews
Receipt acknowledged and conditions agreed to this
_________day of , 2015
BIDDER
By
END OF ADDENDUM NO. 2
ADDENDUM NO. 2
Project No. 100557 Revised: 4/26/2015
6
