READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Okaloosa County BOCC — March 18, 2014 — Sheriff's Office Request for Grant Application — reading text
Part 4 of 6. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — 39-Sheriff_s Office Request for Grant Application.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
Proposal
Main Body of Proposal
@ Statement of the Problem.
This agency has neither the equipment nor trained personnel to examine, compare, and identify suspects
based on latent fingerprint evidence. Requests for latent examinations must be submitted to a state
laboratory. Typically, we do not receive the results for approximately 60 days. This often delays
identification of a suspect and/or the preparation of an arrest warrant for a like period. During that delay,
the suspects are often committing other offenses or have sufficient time to leave the jurisdiction to avoid
detection and arrest, Furthermore, paper print cards for misdemeanor arrests etc have been stored in
archives and cannot be compared to new and “cold” cases, thus losing potential leads for investigation.
MH Project/Program Design and Implementation.
The project entails the following elements:
o Purchase of approved equipment for scanning lifted latent fingerprints, submitting those
images to the AFIS database, and displaying the results of the database query.
o Training and certifying of three current employees in accordance with IAI standards, and
to operate the equipment and perform comparative identification of the results of
automated queries,
o Hiring a certified latents examiner to set up an internal process that meets laboratory
standards and to mentor the three newly-trained employees. This person will also serve
as the secondary review examiner.
Okaloosa County Sheriff's Office
-Paul Coverdell Grant Proposal
o The three current employees and new employee will undergo vendor-provided training on
the equipment.
o Then, a certified trainer from an authorized law enforcement agency will provide interim
additional training necessary while the certification process progresses (this training will
be funded by the agency and is not a requested funding element of the grant).
o The newly hired CLPE employee will coordinate with the state lab and accreditation
sources to develop an internal policy and procedures document for the processing of
latent fingerprints. The procedures document will include a “Field Training Officer” log
to list performance competencies and progress for trained staff. This document will be
reviewed for consistency by the Office of Professional Standards (the agency’s internal
review entity) and coordinated with the Office of State’s Attorney. Once approved by the
stakeholders and review authorities, it will be formally approved by the Sheriff as a
“General Order.”
o Once the project is implemented, latent prints lifted by CSI personnel will be processed
“in-house” rather than submitted to the state lab. This will reduce the backlog at the state
lab and at the requesting agency. Rather than a 60-day wait by this agency, prints will be
examined generally within 72-hours.
o The current CSI staff trained in latent examination will process the latents under the
mentoring of the experienced certified examiner. A Field Training Officer log will be
used to document the progress of the employees’ competencies.
o The Information Technology staff will be tasked with developing standard computer
queries that will document the performance measures necessary for grant reporting.
Okaloosa County Sheriff's Office
Paul Coverdell Grant Proposal
o We have consulted with the Special Agent in Charge of the regional state laboratory to
coordinate our intentions and to seek input on implementation. This application reflects
elements of that coordination.
M@ Capabilities/Competencies.
o The CLPE to be hired will have demonstrated abilities and expertise through their training
and experience in a properly-certified forensics lab. A background check to verify their
competency and work performance will be conducted.
o CSI employees will be able to scan, submit, compare, and identify latent fingerprints
using approved equipment for AFIS submission and comparisons.
o CSI employees will be able to properly document and report their procedures and
findings.
o CSI employees will be able to present latent evidence in court and explain the procedures
used.
o The Okaloosa County Sheriff’s Office has a demonstrated capability to implement such
programs. The agency achieved accreditation through the Florida Commission on Law
Enforcement Accreditation, and is currently working toward achieving national
accreditation. Examples of recent projects include complex programs funded by the US
Department of Homeland Security, including programs of regional impact, such as a 10-
county computerized data sharing system, critical infrastructure hardening projects at two
ports and two airports in the region, a regional intelligence task force, managing a
regional fusion center, and others.
Okaloosa County Sheriff's Office
Paul Coverdell Grant Proposal
M@ =Impact/Outcomes and Evaluation.
ie)
[?)
1o)
Backlogs in processing latent fingerprints will be reduced from 60 days to two days.
Reduction in time to identify suspects will be reduced by the same period.
The time necessary to initiate warrants or probable cause arrests will be reduced by the
same period.
Habitual or serial offenders will be identified and incarcerated sooner, thus resulting in a
reduction of crime.
The regional state lab currently sends out 25 to 50 latent exam requests to other labs in an
attempt to reduce their existing backlog. The state lab must pay the other labs for the
estimated overtime costs to process these requests. Our program, if approved, will reduce
those out-of-lab requests by 28% to 56% per week.
M@ Other / Part 1 violent crimes data.
The average Part 1 crimes for 2010-2012 are as follows:
Murder
Rape
Sodomy
Fondling
Robbery
Agg Asslt
1 1 0
30 37 52
7 10 11
18 37 51
77 69 60
318 401 469
Okaloosa County Sheriff's Office
Paul Coverdell Grant Proposal
Plan for Collecting the Data Required for This Solicitation’s Performance Measures
The Okaloosa County Sheriffs Office currently has a computerized records management system that
contains an Evidence Tracking Module. Evidence is tracked “From cradle to grave” using a barcode and
numeric system. This system contains data elements of date/time recovered, location of recovery, type,
date/time entered into evidence, date/time submitted to lab, date/time received from lab, etc.
The agency has “in-house” Information Technology personnel with the ability to write custom report
queries to track information in a variety of ways. The report queries can be saved for standardized and
reproducible results. All computer entries are saved in an audit tracking file.
The existing system therefore provides the means to collect and report the required performance
measures.
External Investigations Narrative
External and independent investigations of laboratory procedures are designed to have multiple checks
and balances.
The Okaloosa County Sheriff is an elected official and is designated as the chief law enforcement officer
of the county under Florida law. The Florida Department of Law Enforcement has authority for
inspection and enforcement of standards under Florida statutes.
The first layer is provided by the agency’s Office of Professional Standards, which performs internal
administrative and disciplinary reviews/investigations. This office answers directly to the Sheriff and is
commanded by a Captain who is a graduate of the FBI National Academy, Florida Department of Law
9
Okaloosa County Sheriffs Office
Paul Coverdell Grant Proposal
Enforcement Executive Leadership Institute, and various state and federal training programs on internal
investigations,
The next layer is provided by the Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE), which has statutory
authority to inspect and review agency compliance with the Criminal Justice Standards Commission,
applicable statutes, and regulations of the FDLE for evidence handling. The FDLE also has statutory
authority to conduct criminal investigations of law enforcement agencies when warranted.
The Office of State’s Attorney also has statutory authority to investigate misconduct or malfeasance bya
law enforcement agency.
Attachments
10
FY 2014 Coverdell Forensic Science
Improvement Grants Program
Mar 10, 2014
Attachment: External Investigations
Name of Applicant Agency (including Name of State or Unit of Local Government):
Okaloosa County Board of Commissioners, on behalf of Okaloosa County Sheriff's Office
Date: March 10, 2014
Existing government entity (entities) with an appropriate process in place to conduct independent external
investigations
1. Florida Department of Law Enforcement, 2331 Phillips Rd, Tallahassee, FL 32308
Okaloosa County
2014 Paul Coverdell Forensics Grant Application
Plan for Collecting the Data Required for This Solicitation’s Performance Measures
The Okaloosa County Sheriff's Office currently has a computerized records management system
that contains an Evidence Tracking Module. Evidence is tracked “From cradle to grave” using a
barcode and numeric system. This system contains data elements of date/time recovered,
location of recovery, type, date/time entered into evidence, date/time submitted to lab, date/time
received from lab, etc.
The agency has “in-house” Information Technology personnel with the ability to write custom
report queries to track information in a variety of ways. The report queries can be saved for
standardized and reproducible results. All computer entries are saved in an audit tracking file.
The existing system therefore provides the means to collect and report the required performance
measures.
General Instructions & Resources View Budget Summary OMB APPROVAL NO: 1121-0329
EXPIRES 7/31/2016
Budget Detail Worksheet
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
Purpose: The Budget Detail Worksheet is provided for your use in the preparation of the budget and budget narrative. All
required information (including the budget narrative) must be provided. Any category of expense not applicable to your budget
may be left blank. Indicate any non-federal( match ) amount in the appropriate category, if applicable.
For each budget category, you can see a sample by clicking (To View an Example, Click Here) at the end of each description.
There are various hot links listed in red in the budget categories that will provide additional information via documents on the internet.
Record Retention: In accordance with the requirements set forth in 28 CFR Parts 66 and 70, all financial records, supporting
documents, statistical records, and all other records pertinent to the award shall be retained by each organization for at least three
years following the closure of the audit report covering the grant period.
The information disclosed in this form is subject to the Freedom of Information Act under 5 U.S.C. 55.2.
A. Personnel — List each position by title and name of employee, if available. Show the annual salary rate and the percentage of time to be devoted to the project.
Compensation paid for employees engaged in grant activities must be consistent with that paid for similar work within the applicant organization. Include a description of the
responsibilities and duties of each position in relationship to fulfilling the project goals and objectives. (Note: Use whole numbers as the percentage of time, an example is
75.50% should be shown as 75.50) To View an Example, Click Here
PERSONNEL (FEDERAL)
Computation
Name Position Cost
Salary Basis Percentage of Time Length of Time
Year Oe eal co me a 4 : $0
FEDERAL TOTAL $0
PERSONNEL NARRATIVE (FEDERAL)
PERSONNEL (NON-FEDERAL)
Computation
Name Position Cost
Salary Basis Percentage of Time Length of Time
Year $0
NON-FEDERAL TOTAL $0
PERSONNEL NARRATIVE (NON-FEDERAL)
TOTAL PERSONNEL $0
B. Fringe Benefits — Fringe benefits should be based on actual known costs or an approved negotiated rate by a Federal agency. If not based
on an approved negotiated rate, list the composition of the fringe benefit package. Fringe benefits
