Okaloosa County BOCC — August 19, 2014 — FAA Grant Application_VPS Boarding Ramps

CONTRACT & LEASE INTERNAL COORDINATION SHEET Contract/Lease Number: Tracking Number:_ /0 55 - M4 Grant Funded: YESS NO Contractor/Lessee Name: Laat (py becca tear Purpose_ VQ me tage Date/Term: 1. Ext Greater THAN $50,000 Amount: 2's LJ GREATER THAN $25,000 Department: AP 3. LJ $25,000 OR LESS Dept. Monitor name aman /Yeree Document has been reviewed and includes any attachments or exhibits. Purchasing Review Date: K- 4- ff Pant uréhasing Director or Désignee Joanne Kublik Risk Management Review Approved as written: << NETS ik a Date: Go a! 43 == Risk Manager or designee ) Kae, Gedus Ln : a) aa County Attorney Review sont ved as writ ta 7 On” Date: B-W—\Y epi At torney Gregory T. Stewart Following Okaloosa County approval: Contracts & Grants Document has been received: Date: Contracts & Grants Manager OMB Approval No. 0348-0043 APPLICATION FOR 2. DATE SUBMITTED Applicant Identifier 8/1/2014 FEDERAL ASSISTANCE 1. TYPE OF 3. DATE RECEIVED BY STATE State Application Identifier SUBMISSION: Application Preapplication 1 Construction O Construction I Non-Construction 1 Non-Construction 4. DATE RECEIVED BY FEDERAL AGENCY Federal Identifier 5. APPLICANT INFORMATION Legal Name: Okaloosa County Board of County Commissioners DUNS 613277649 Organizational Unit: -Office of Contracts & Grants Address (give city, county, state, and zip code) 1804 Lewis Turner Blvd (Ste 206) Fort Walton Beach, FL 32547 Name and telephone number of the person to be contracted on matters involving this application (give area code) Marcella Eubanks(850)651-7200, Ext 4381 e-mail: grants@clerkofcourts.cc EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (EIN): 7. TYPE OF APPLICANT: (enter appropriate letter in box) B [9] = [5] fo] fo] [o] [5] A. State H. Interdependent School District B. County |. State Controlled Institution of Higher Learning C. Municipal J. Private University , D. Township K. Indian Tribe 8. TYPE OF APPLICATION: E. Interstate L. Individual i N oO cannauat oO Revisi F. Intermunicipal M. Profit Organization lew ontinuation evision G. Special District N. Other (Specify) If Revision, enter appropriate letter(s) in box(es): B Decrease Award C_ Increase Duration Other (specify) A_ Increase Award D Decrease Duration 9. NAME OF FEDERAL AGENCY Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 10. CATALOG OF FEDERAL DOMESTIC ASSISTANCE NUMBER 2 O;. 71 0 6 TITLE: Airport Improvement Program (AIP) 11. DESCRIPTIVE TITLE OF APPLICANT'S PROJECT: Replace obsolete Regional Boarding Ramps with Ground Level Passenger Loading Bridges at Gates A-1 and A-2 for 12. AREAS AFFECTED BY PROJECT (cities, counties, states, etc.): Okaloosa County Northwest Florida Regional Airport. 13. PROPOSED PROJECT 14. CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS OF Start Date Ending Date a. Applicant b. Project Dec 2014 Feb 2015 1st 1st 15. ESTIMATED FUNDING 16. IS APPLICATION SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY STATE EXECUTIVE ORDER 12372 PROCESS a. Federal $ 1.731.921 -00 a. YES, THIS PREAPPLICATION/APPLICATION WAS MADE AVAILABLE TO THE anne STATE EXECUTIVE ORDER 12372 PROCESS FOR REVIEW ON b. Applicant PFC $ 96,218 00 c. State $ 96,218 00 DATE: d. Local $ b. NO DX] PROGRAM IS NOT COVERED BY E. O. 12372 e. Other $ im OR PROGRAM HAS NOT BEEN SELECTED BY STATE FOR REVIEW f. Program income $ 17. IS THE APPLICANT DELINQUENT ON ANY FEDERAL DEBT? g. TOTAL $ 1,924,357 -90 CT] Yes _ If yes, attach an explanation 4] No 18. TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, ALL DATA IN THIS APPLICATION ARE TRUE AND CORRECT, THE DOCUMENT HAS BEEN DULY AUTHORIZED BY THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE APPLICANT AND THE APPLICANT WILL COMPLY WITH THE ATTACHED ASSURANCES IF THE ASSISTANCE IS AWARDED a. Typed Name of Authorized Representative b. Title Charles K. Windes, Jr. Chairman, Okaloosa Board of County Commissioners c. Telephone number (850)651-7105 d. Signature of Authorized Representative e. Date Signed out Ss Taw A Ko Lorre on itions Not Usable Previous Authorized for Local Reproduction ““Btandard Form 424 (REV 4-88) Prescribed by OMB Circular A-102 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION OMB NO. 80-RO184 PART Il PROJECT APPROVAL INFORMATION SECTION A Item 1 Does this assistance request require State, local, Name of Governing Body regional, or other priority rating? Priority L]Yes K]No Item 2. Does this assistance request require State, local Name of Agency or Board advisory, educational or health clearances? (Attach Documentation) []Yes K]No Item 3 Does this assistance request require clearinghouse review in accordance with OMB Circular A-95? (Attach Comments) []Yes K]No Item 4 Does this assistance request require State, local, Name of Approving Agency regional or other planning approval? Date LTYes K]No Check One: State im Item 5. Local O Is the proposed project covered by an approved Regional (C] comprehensive plan? L]Yes KXINo Location of plan Item 6. . . Will the assistance requested serve a Federal Name of Federal Installation Eglin Air Force Base installation? Federal Population benefiting from Project X]lYes LJNo Item 7 Will the assistance requested be on Federal land Name of Federal Installation Eglin Air Force Base or installation? Location of Federal Land Florida Lxlves LJNo Percent of Project 100% Item 8 Will the assistance requested have an impact or effect on the environment? LlYes X]No Number of: Item 9. Individuals Will the assistance requested cause the displacement of Families individuals, families, businesses, or farms? Ov PN Businesses es o Farms Item 10. Is there other related Federal assistance on this project previous, pending, or anticipated? L]Yes K]No FAA Form 5100-100 (6-73) SUPERSEDES FAA FORM 5100-10 PAGES 1 THRU 7 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION Page 2 OMB NO. 80-RO184 PART II —- SECTION C The Sponsor hereby represents and certifies as follows: 1. Compatible Land Use. — The Sponsor has taken the following actions to assure compatible usage of land adjacent to or in the vicinity of the airport: N/A 2. Defaults. — The Sponsor is not in default on any obligation to the United States or any agency of the United States Government relative to the development, operation, or maintenance of any airport, except as stated herewith: N/A 3. Possible Disabilities. - There are no facts or circumstances (including the existence of effective or proposed leases, use agreements or other legal instruments affecting use of the Airport or the existence of pending litigation or other legal proceedings) which in reasonable probability might make it impossible for the Sponsor to carry out and complete the Project or carry out the provisions of Part V of this Application, either by limiting its legal or financial ability or otherwise, except as follows: N/A 4. Land. — (a) The sponsor holds the following property interest in the following areas of land* which are to be developed or used as part of or in connection with the Airport subject to the following exceptions, encumbrances, and adverse interests, all of which areas are identified on the aforementioned property map designated as Exhibit “A”: Land is on Eglin Air Force Base under a lease to Okaloosa County *State character of property interest in each area and list and identify for each all exceptions, encumbrances, and adverse interests of every kind and nature, including liens, easements, leases, etc. The separate areas of land need only be identified here by the area numbers shown on the property map. FAA Form 5100-100 (4-76) AAA Me U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION OMB NO. 80-RO184 PART II - SECTION C (Continued) The Sponsor further certifies that the above is based on a title examination by a qualified attorney or title company and that such attorney or title company has determined that the Sponsor holds the above property interests. (a)The Sponsor will acquire within a reasonable time, but in any event prior to the start of any construction work under the Project, the following property interest in the following areas of land* on which such construction work is to be performed, all of which areas are identified on the aforementioned property map designated as Exhibit “A”: N/A (c)The Sponsor will acquire within a reasonable time, and if feasible prior to the completion of all construction work under the Project, the following property interest in the following areas of land* which are to be developed or used as part of or in connection with the Airport as it will be upon completion of the Project, all of which areas are identified on the aforementioned property map designated as Exhibit “A”: N/A 5. Exclusive Rights. — There is no grant of an exclusive right for the conduct of any aeronautical activity at any airport owned or controlled by the Sponsor except as follows: None *State character of property interest in each area and list and identify for each all exceptions, encumbrances, and adverse interests of every kind and nature, including liens, easements, leases, etc. The separate areas of land need only be identified here by the area numbers shown on the property map. FAA Form 5100-100 (4-76) PAAMCEeT ate U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION OMB NO. 80-RO184 PART III- BUDGET INFORMATION - CONSTRUCTION SECTION A - GENERAL 1. Federal Domestic Assistance Catalog No. 2. Functional or Other Breakout. SECTION B - CALCULATION OF FEDERAL GRANT Cost Classification Use only for revisions Latest Approved Amount Adjustment + or(-) Total Amount Required Administration Expense 2,000 N Preliminary Expense Land, structures, right-of-way iN . Architectural engineering basic fees (Incl Const Mgt) 63,440 Other architectural engineering fees Project inspection fees Land development Relocation Expenses Relocation payments to individuals and businesses 10. Demolition and removal 11. Construction and project improvement 1,858,917 12. Equipment 13. Miscellaneous Pre-construction CM at Risk Phase | 14. Total (Lines 1 through 13) 1,924,357 15. Estimated Income (if applicable) 16. Net Project Amount (Line 14 minus 15) 17. Less: Ineligible Exclusions 18. Add: Contingencies 19. Total Project Amt. (Excluding Rehabilitation Grants) 20. Federal Share requested of Line 19 1,731,921 21. Add Rehabilitation Grants Requested (100 percent) 22. Total Federal grant requested (Lines 20 & 21) 1,731,921 23. Grantee share PFC 96,218 24. Other shares State of Florida 96,218 25. Total project (Lines 22, 23, & 24) 1,924,357 FAA Form 5100-100 (6-73) SUPERSEDES FAA FORM 5100-10 PAGES 1 THRU 7 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION Page 4 OMB NO. 80-RO184 SECTION C - EXCLUSIONS Classification Ineligible for Participation Excluded from Contingency Provision 26 (1) _(2) a. $ $ b.. c. d. e. f. g- Totals SECTION D - PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING NON-FEDERAL SHARE 27. Grantee Share $ 96,218 a. Securities b. Mortgages c. Appropriations (By Applicant) d. Bonds e. Tax Levies f. Non Cash g .Other (Explain) Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) 96,218 h .TOTAL — Grantee share 96,218 28. Other Shares 96,218 a. State 96,218 b. Other c. Total Other Shares 96,218 29. TOTAL $ 192,436 SECTION E - REMARKS PART IV PROGRAM NARRATIVE (Attach - See Instructions) — FAA Form 5100-100 (6-73) SUPERSEDES FAA FORM 5100-10 PAGES 1 THRU 7 FAA AC 75-023 PART IV PROGRAM NARRATIVE PROJECT: Purchase and install two passenger loading bridges to replace obsolete Regional Boarding Ramps | AIRPORT: Northwest Florida Regional Airport 1. Objective: To provide safe and efficient passenger loading capability, replacing open (but covered) inferior ramps. 2. Benefits Anticipated: Protects passengers from elements and provides a safer entry onboard aircraft. Previous RBRs were prone to failure and possible serious falls. 3. Approach: (See approved Scope of Work in final Application) 4. Geographic Location: See attached sketch 5. Justification for Force Account Work: (if applicable) N/A 6: Sponsor's Representative: (incl. address & tel. no.) Mr. Sunil Harman, A.A,E., [AP Northwest Florida Regional Airport 1701 SR 85 North Eglin, AFB, FL 32542 (850)651-7160, Extension 4 Sas apis meee sas or 2. ——— NORTHWEST FLORIDA Onensa Ponan seerosion [ESS SE REGIONAL AIRPORT AIRPORT PROPERTY MAP Patonrasia [or MRA TERMINAL PLAN UPDATE ep con ser 3 3 15/5 |5||S| || (c|s|xjz 8 3 Exhibit A U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION AIRPORT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SPONSOR CERTIFICATION EQUIPMENT/CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS OKALOOSA COUNTY NORTHWEST FLORIDA REGIONAL Pax Loading Bridges (Sponsor) (Airport) (Project Number) Description of Work: Title 49, United States Code (USC), section 47105(d), authorizes the Secretary to require certification from the sponsor that it will comply with the statutory and administrative requirements in carrying out a project under the Airport Improvement Program (AIP). General standards for equipment and construction contracts within Federal grant programs are described in Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 18.36. AIP standards are generally described in FAA Advisory Circular (AC) 150/5100-6, Labor Requirements for the Airport Improvement Program, AC 150/5100-15, Civil Rights Requirements for the Airport Improvement Program, and AC 150/5100-16, Airport Improvement Program Grant Assurance One--General Federal Requirements. Sponsors may use State and local procedures provided procurements conform to these Federal standards. Except for the certified items below marked not applicable (N/A), the list includes major requirements for this aspect of project implementation, although it is not comprehensive, nor does it relieve the sponsor from fully complying with all applicable statutory and administrative standards. No N/A CO U 4. Acode or standard of conduct isGwill bé}in effect governing the performance of the sponsor's officers; €mployees, or agents in soliciting and awarding procurement contracts. 2. Qualified personnel arefwill Bs) engaged to perform contract administration, engineering supervision, construction inspection, and testing. 3. The procurement was((will be) publicly advertised using the competitive sealed bid method of procurement. RR Rf 4, The bid solicitation clearly and accurately describes (will a. The current Federal wage rate determination for all construction projects, and b. All other requirements of the equipment and/or services to be provided. IN L C Page 10f3 June 28, 2005 Yes No N/A 5. Concurrence Will bey obtained from FAA prior to contract award under any of the following circumstances: a, Only one qualified person/firm submits a responsive bid, b. The contract is to be awarded to other than the lowest responsible bidder, c. Life cycle costing is a factor in selecting the lowest responsive bidder, or d. Proposed contract prices are more than 10 percent over the sponsor’s cost estimate. 6. All contracts exceeding $100,000 requir€ (will require) the following provisions: enamel a. A bid guarantee of 5 percent, a performance bond of 100 percent, and a payment bond of 100 percent; b. Conditions specifying administrative, contractual, and legal f remedies, including contract termination, for those instances LJ LI in which contractors violate or breach contact terms; and c. Compliance with applicable standards and requirements issued under Section 306 of the Clean Air Act (42 USC 1857(h)), Section 508 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1368), and Executive Order 11738. oN 7. All construction contracts contain (fll contain)»provisions for: a. Compliance with the Copeland “Anti-Kick Back” Act, and b. Preference given in the employment of labor (except in mr | [| executive, administrative, and supervisory positions) to honorably discharged Vietnam era veterans and disabled veterans. 8. All construction contracts exceeding $2,000 contain (will contain) the following provisions: , a. Compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act based on the current ww oO O Federal wage rate determination; and b. Compliance with the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 USC 327-330), Sections 103 and 107. 9. All construction contracts exceeding $10,000 contain (vill. “contaipy appropriate clauses from 41 CFR Part 60 for ta compliance with Executive Orders 11246 and 11375 on Equal C] L] Employment Opportunity. 10. All contracts and subcontracts contairf (will contain) clauses required from Title VI of the Civil Rights Acta CFR 23 and cA 49 CFR 26 for Disadvantaged Business Enterprises. Page 2 of 3 June 28, 2005 Yes No NIA 11. Appropriate checks have-beer(will be)nade to assure that contracts or subcontracts are not awarded to those individuals or firms suspended, debarred, or voluntarily excluded from doing 4 C] business with any U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) element and appearing on the DOT Unified List. UU | certify, for the project identified herein, responses to the forgoing items are accurate as marked and have prepared documentation attached hereto for any item marked “no” that is correct and complete. OKALOOSA COUNTY FLORIDA Jame ofSponsor) an Vag of sors Designated Official Representalive) unil Aary , A.A.E., IAP (Typed Name of Sponsor's Designated Official Representative) Airports Director (Typed Title of Sponsor's Designated Official Representative) July 31, 2014 (Date) Page 3 0f 3 Jung 28, 2095 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION AIRPORT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SPONSOR CERTIFICATION DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE ORALZOE COUNTY NORTHWEST FLORIDA REGIONAL PAX LOADING BRTDGES (Sponsor} (Airport) (Project Number Description of Work: Title 49, United States Code, section 47105(d), authorizes the Secretary to require certification from the sponsor that it will comply with the statutory and administrative requirements in carrying out a project under the Airport Improvement Program (AIP). General requirements on the drug-free workplace within Federal grant programs are described in Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 29. Sponsors are required to certify they will be, or will continue to provide, a drug-free workplace in accordance with the regulation. The AIP project grant agreement contains specific assurances on the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988. Except for the certified items below marked not applicable (N/A), the list includes major requirements for this aspect of project implementation, although it is not comprehensive, nor does it relieve the sponsor from fully complying with all applicable statutory and administrative standards. Yes No N/A 1. Astatement has been (@witebe) published notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the me sponsor's workplace, and specifying the actions to be taken against employees for violation of such prohibition. LJ LO 2. An ongoing drug-free awareness program has been (wittBeé) established to inform employees about: a, The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace; b. The sponsor's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace; ta oO O c. Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs; and d. The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations occurring in the workplace. 3. Each employee to be engaged in the performance of the work has been (wi-bé) given a copy of the statement required within mo item 1 above. 4, Employees have been (witibe) notified in the statement required by item 1 above that, as 4 condition employment under the grant, the employee will: . ua [| LJ a. Abide by the terms of the statement; and Page 1 of 2 June 28, 2005 b. Notify the employer in writing of his or her conviction for a violation of a criminal drug statute occurring in the workplace no later than five calendar days after such conviction. 5. The FAA will be notified in writing within ten calendar days after receiving notice under item 4b above from an employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such conviction. Employers of convicted employees must provide notice, including position title of the employee, to the FAA. Notices shall include the project number of each affected grant. 6. One of the following actions will be taken within 30 calendar days of receiving a notice under item 4b above with respect to any employee who is so convicted: a. Take appropriate personnel action against such an employee, up to and including termination, consistent with the requirements of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; or b. Require such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by a Federal, State, or local health, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency. 7. A good faith effort will be made to continue to maintain a drug- free workplace through implementation of items 1 through 6 above. Yes No N/A ay O O | have prepared documentation attached hereto with site(s) for performance of work (street address, city, county, state, zip code). There are no such workplaces that are not identified in the attachment. | have prepared additional documentation for any above items marked “no” and attached it hereto. | certify that, for the project identified herein, responses to the forgoing items are accurate as marked and attachments are correct and complete. OKALOOSA COUNTY PLORIDY (Name of Sponsor) “ (Signature of Poppet ‘ed Official Representative) arm Sunil A.A.E. (Typed Name of Sponsor's Ssnaled iia Representative) Airports Director (Typed Title of Sponsor's Designated Official Representative) July 31, 2014 (Date) Page 2 of 2 June 28, 2005 U.S, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION AIRPORT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SPONSOR CERTIFICATION SELECTION OF CONSULTANTS OKALOOSA COUNTY NORTHWEST FLORIDA REGIONAL PAX LOADING BRIDGES (Sponsor) (Airport) (Project Number) Description of Work: Title 49, United States Code, section 47105(d), authorizes the Secretary to require certification from the sponsor that it will comply with the statutory and administrative requirements in carrying out a project under the Airport Improvement Program (AIP). General standards for selection of consultant services within Federal grant programs are described in Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 18.36. Sponsors may use other qualifications-based procedures provided they are equivalent to specific standards in 49 CFR 18 and FAA Advisory Circular 150/5100-14, Architectural, Engineering, and Planning Consultant Services for Airport Grant Projects. Except for the certified items below marked not applicable (N/A), the list includes major requirements for this aspect of project implementation, although it is not comprehensive, nor does it relieve the sponsor from fully complying with all applicable statutory and administrative standard. Yes No N/A 1. Solicitations we will be made to ensure fair and open competition from a wide area of interest. ce CJ | 2. Consultants weré or will beSelected using competitive procedures based on qualifications, experience, and disadvantaged enterprise requirements with the fees determined through negotiations. 3. Arecord of negotiations has-aeen déwill belprepared reflecting considerations involved in the establishment of fees, which are not significantly above the sponsor's independent cost estimate. 4. |f engineering or other services are to be performed by sponsor / force account personnel, prior approval was-af will be obtained from the FAA. 5. The consultant services contracts clearly establish of will blearly establish the scope of work and delineate the division of responsibilities between all parties engaged in carrying out elements of the project. 6. Costs associated with work ineligible for AIP funding are-op Will) be clearly identified and separated from eligible items in solicitations, contracts, and related project documents. June 28, 2005 Page 1 of 2 Yes No N/A 7. Mandatory contact provisions for grant-assisted contracts have ra been oil bSincluded in consultant services contracts. LJ L] 8. The cost-plus-percentage-of-cost methods of contracting aA 0 LJ prohibited under Federal standards were-not or will notbe used. 9. If the services being procured cover more than the single grant project referenced in this certification, the scope of work was-or ef (will be specifically described in the advertisement, and future CJ LJ work will not be initiated beyond five years. | certify, for the project identified herein, responses to the forgoing items are accurate as marked and have prepared documentation attached hereto for any item marked “no” that is correct and complete. OKALOOSA COUNTY FLORIDA lame Ff Sponsor) 4 (Signatur¢ of Sp Vina Official Representative) Sunil Hafman/AA.E., IAP {T} yped Name of Sponsor's Designated Official Representative) Airports Director (Typed Title of Sponsor's Designated Official Representative) July 31, 2014 (Date) Page 2 of 2 June 28, 2005 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION AIRPORT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SPONSOR CERTIFICATION PROJECT PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS NORTHWEST FLORIDA REGIONAL PAX LOADING BRIDGES OKALOOSA COUNTY (Sponsor) (Airport) (Project Number) Description of Work: Title 49, United States Code, section 47105(d), authorizes the Secretary to require certification from the sponsor that it will comply with the statutory and administrative requirements in carrying outa project under the Airport |!mprovement Program (AIP). AIP standards are generally described in FAA Advisory Circular (AC) 150/5100-6, Labor Requirements for the Airport Improvement Program, AC 150/5100-15, Civil Rights Requirements for the Airport Imorovement Program, and AC 150/5100-16, Airport Improvement Program Grant Assurance One--General Federal Requirements. A list of current advisory circulars with specific standards for design or construction of airports as well as procurement/installation of equipment and facilities is referenced in standard airport sponsor Grant Assurance 34 contained in the grant agreement. Except for the certified items below marked not applicable (N/A), the list includes major requirements for this aspect of project implementation, although it is not comprehensive, nor does it relieve the sponsor from fully complying with all applicable statutory and administrative standards. Yes No N/A 1. The plans and specifications veri prepared in accordance with applicable Federal standards and requirements, so no deviation or modification to standards set forth in the advisory circulars, or State standard, is necessary other than those previously approved by the FAA. C O e) proprietary or written so as to restrict competition. At least 2. Specifications for the procurement of equipment are not {will not 2 manufacturers can meet the specification. 3. The development included@to be included in the plans is depicted on the airport layout plan approved by the FAA. 4, Development that is ineligible for AIP funding has beer(will be) omitted from the plans and specifications. 5. The process control and acceptance tests required for the project by standards contained in Advisory Circular 150/5370-10 included in the project specifications. a 6. Ifa value engineeri use is incorporated into the contract, concurrence was (will be) obtained from the FAA. 7. a FRA RR Oooogoa g Omqg@ooaoadg The plans and specifications incorporate twill incorporate applicable requirements and recommendations sef forth in the Federally approved environmental finding. Pago 1 of 2 Jure 28, 2005 Yes No N/A 8. For construction activities within or near aircraft operational areas, the requirements ,contained in Advisory Circular 150/5370-2 have been (will bé)discussed with the FAA as well wm [| [| as incorporated into the specifications, and a safety/phasing plan has FAA’s concurrence, if required. 9. The project was((uil be) physically completed without Federal participation in costs due to errors and omissions in the plans ta and specifications that were foreseeable at the time of project LI LJ design. | certify, for the project identified herein, responses to the forgoing items are accurate as marked and have prepared documentation attached hereto for any item marked “no” that is correct and complete. OKALOOSA COUNTY FLORIDA 2. PA (Namgfof SfoprSor) (Signaffre of Sons lesignated Official Representative) Su Hafmay, A.A.E., IAP (Typed Name of Sponsor's Designated Official Representative) Airports Director (Typed Title of Sponsor's Designated Official Representative) July 31, 2014 (Date) Page 2 of 2 June 28, 2005 LPA Group Inc. A Unit of Michael Baker THE LPA ee 4503 Woodland Corporate Bivd. GROUP — . TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS Suite 400 Tampa, Florida 33614 A UNIT OF MICHAEL BAKER CORPORATION (813) 889-3892 July 14, 2014 Mr. Tracy Stage, A.A.E. Deputy Director Okaloosa County Airports 1701 State Road 85 N Eglin AFB, Florida 32542-1413 Re: Recommendation of Award; Bid No. AP 49-14 Boarding Bridges and Bag Lifts Dear Mr. Stage, We have reviewed the bids submitted on June 25, 2014 for the above referenced project. The County had a total of two bidders, however only one was responsive. Thyssen Krupp Airport Systems Inc. Base Bid: $1,686,450.00 Additive 1: $ 197,577.00 Additive 2: $114,611.00 Cathey Construction and Development, LLC No price provided Thyssen Krupp Airport Systems Inc., (TKAS) has been determined to be the lowest responsive bidder. Details of their bid are listed below: o History- In Florida alone, TKAS has supplied 55 bridges to Miami, 35 to Orlando, 28 to West Palm Beach, 12 to Sanford, two in Tallahassee, and 13 to Tampa. Internationally, they have installed over 5,000 bridges. They have been in business for 30 years and are widely considered a reputable manufacturer of airport boarding bridges. Size of Firm- Bonding capacity of $400M. They have 217,042 s.f. of manufacturing space with 14 overhead cranes. o Subcontractor- The installer they identify is Aero Bridge Works for a contract value of $241,864.00. No Subcontractor Qualification form was provided, however it was not required because the subcontract amount is below $500,000 and it is less than 25% of contract value. o DBE participation- TKAS lists two DBE subcontractors. The first is Airport Contractor Services for an amount of $103,101.00 to perform or supply barricades, cranes, engineering, apron striping, and auxiliary components. The second is Davis Freight Management for an amount of $27,635 to perform transportation. Since equipment suppliers only count for 60% of total, this number is adjusted to $89,496 which equates to 4.48%; exceeding the County goal of 4.03%. Funding- Since there is two different grants, the bag lifts must be broken out of the bid schedule. For tracking, | have identified the boarding bridges as Grant #1 and the Bag lifts as Grant #2. Please refer to attached Bid Tab for calculations under the heading “Funding Adjustments”. The total for Grant #1 including additive bids (preconditioned air and ground power) is $1,858,917. The total for Grant #2 is $139,721. A bid bond was provided and all required forms were completed without exception. All addendums were acknowledged. Thyssen Krupp provided a General Contractors license and the installer provided a Florida General Contractor’s license. In LPA’s review, we found no major unbalanced unit prices and no irregularities with their bid. It is our opinion the bid is complete and responsive, subject to County Purchasing review and Okaloosa County Board of County Commissioners’ approval. LPA recommends award of the contract to Thyssen Krupp Airport Systems Inc. Selection of the additive bids is dependent on grant funding and local matches. Should you have questions, please advise. Sincerely, THE LPA GROUP INCORPORATED Doug Hambrecht, PE, Project Manager Attachment: Bid Tabulation (1 page) LPA Group Inc. A Unit of Michael Baker E (pA aN 4503 Woodland Corporate Blvd. GROUP Suite 400 TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS A UNIT OF MICHAEL BAKER CORPORATION Tampa, Florida 33614 (813) 889-3892 July 14, 2014 Mr. Tracy Stage, A.A.E. Deputy Director Okaloosa County Airports 1701 State Road 85 N Eglin AFB, Fiorida 32542-1413 Re: Recommendation of Award; Bid No. AP 49-14 Boarding Bridges and Bag Lifts Dear Mr. Stage, We have reviewed the bids submitted on June 25, 2014 for the above referenced project. The County had a total of two bidders, however only one was responsive. Thyssen Krupp Airport Systems Inc. Base Bid: $1,686,450.00 Additive 1: $197,577.00 Additive 2: $ 114,611.00 Cathey Construction and Development, LLC No price provided Thyssen Krupp Airport Systems Inc., (TKAS) has been determined to be the lowest responsive bidder. Details of their bid are listed below: 9 History- In Florida alone, TKAS has supplied 55 bridges to Miami, 35 to Orlando, 28 to West Palm Beach, 12 to Sanford, two in Tallahassee, and 13 to Tampa. Internationally, they have installed over 5,000 bridges. They have been in business for 30 years and are widely considered a reputable manufacturer of airport boarding bridges. o Size of Firm- Bonding capacity of $400M. They have 217,042 s.f. of manufacturing space with 14 overhead cranes. o Subcontractor- The installer they identify is Aero Bridge Works for a contract value of $241,864.00. No Subcontractor Qualification form was provided, however it was not required because the subcontract amount is below $500,000 and it is less than 25% of contract value. o DBE participation- TKAS lists two DBE subcontractors. The first is Airport Contractor Services for an amount of $103,101.00 to perform or supply barricades, cranes, engineering, apron striping, and auxiliary components. The second is Davis Freight Management for an amount of $27,635 to perform transportation. Since equipment suppliers only count for 60% of total, this number is adjusted to $89,496 which equates to 4.48%; exceeding the County goal of 4.03%. Funding- Since there is two different grants, the bag lifts must be broken out of the bid schedule. For tracking, | have identified the boarding bridges as Grant #1 and the Bag lifts as Grant #2. Please refer to attached Bid Tab for calculations under the heading “Funding Adjustments”. The total for Grant #1 including additive bids (preconditioned air and ground power) is $1,858,917. The total for Grant #2 is $139,721. A bid bond was provided and all required forms were completed without exception. All addendums were acknowledged. Thyssen Krupp provided a General Contractors license and the installer provided a Florida General Contractor’s license. In LPA’s review, we found no major unbalanced unit prices and no irregularities with their bid. It is our opinion the bid is complete and responsive, subject to County Purchasing review and Okaloosa County Board of County Commissioners’ approval. LPA recommends award of the contract to Thyssen Krupp Airport Systems Inc. Selection of the additive bids is dependent on grant funding and local matches. Should you have questions, please advise. Sincerely, THE LPA GROUP INCORPORATED Doug Hambrecht, P.E. Project Manager Attachment: Bid Tabulation (1 page) Bid Tabulation for NORTHWEST. NORTHWEST FLORIDA REGIONAL AIRPORT 4 FLY VPS BOARDING BRIDGES AND BAG LIFTS x OKALOOSA COUNTY AIRPORTS REGIONAL Bid #: AP 49-14 Sorintamnerer ad Bid Opening: 6/25/2014, 4:00 PM BID Engineer's Estimate ThyssenKrupp Item{ Pay Item Number item Description Quantity j Unit Unit Price Amount Unit Price Amount 4 01000 Mobilization 4 ts $95,000.00: $95,000.00! $59,959.00 $59,959.00 2 P-620-1 Reflective Pavement Markings 2,500 SF $2.10 $5,250.00 $2.35 $5,875.00 Be : P-620-2 INon-Reflective Pavement Markings 3,000 | SF $1.50 $4,500.00 $1.90 $5,700.00 * 4 S-140 Pavement Marking Removal 7,000 SF $2.10 $14,700.00 $2.80 $19,600.00 5 “S140 al of Existing Lit BS i ts $4,752.00 $4,752.00 Provide and Install New Ground Power Cables and 6 01920A Connections. This pay item includes both bridges. 1 LS $6,500.00 - $6,500.00) $16,434.00 $16,434.00 7 019208 land Connections. This pay item includes both 4 ts $8,500.00 $8,500.00 $10,150.00 $10,150.00 8 01920C Relocate Interior Gate Signage 1 LS $4,500.00 $4,500.00) $2,172.00 $2,172.00 Baggage Lifting System. This item shall include ali necessary for a complete operational system in place as required by the plans and specifications. Work items include but are not : 9 14540 bited 16 foundational fe electica! 4 EA $30,000.00 $120,000.00) $34,930.25 : USE! co ions, baggage cart, modification of and watertight attachment to existing passenger Passenger Boarding Bndge. This item shall include all design, fabrication, procurement, installation, and construction of a complete 10 14950 operational apron drive passenger boarding bridge 2 EA $600,000.00 $1,200,000.00 $711,043.50 $1,422,087.00 and fixed bridge system to be connected to the Total $1,458,950.00} {Total ADD BiD PR OND O D AIR {tem} Pay Item Number item Description - Quantity } Unit Unit Price Amount Unit Price Amount (A1-4 $-140 |Remove Existing Pre Conditioned Air Unit. 2 EA $5,000.00 $10,000.00} $1,700.56 $3,401.00 DEDUCT - "Provide and Install New Pre A1-2 01920 Conditioned Air Hoses and Connections" from 1 LS (38,500.C0) -$8,500.00 (310,150.00) -$10,150.00 BASE BID ITEM7 above. At 1060 | Pee eee ee 2 | EA | $100,000.00 $200,000.00] | $102,163.00 $204,326.00 Total $201,500.004 {Total ADD BID RO D PO Item] Pay Item Number Item Description Quantity | Unit Unit Price Amount Unit Price Amount jA2-4 $-140 Remove Existing Ground Power Unit. 2 EA $6,500.00 $13,000.00} $905.00 | $1,810.00 DEDUCT - "Provide and Install New Ground Power Cables and Connections. This pay item (REAR BRI - any 4 A2-2) 01920 includes both bridges." from BASE BID ITEM 6 A Ls dais 95,908.00 (318.434 00 diaiadiaad above. Provide and Install 28VDC/400Hz Frequency A2-3 14950 Converter Ground Power Unk C 6s ih Place. 2 EA $60,000.00 $120,000. $64,617.50 $129,235.00 Total $126,500.004 {Total * Represents an error in math from the bid form e. puters contgined within this Bid Tabulation are July 14, 2014 Doug Hambrecht, P.E. THE LPA GROUP INCORPORATED 7/14/2014 HH e_ YN GRouP SSS TRANS! PORTATION CONSULTANTS. A.Unt of Michoe! Boker Grant #1 FUNDING ADJUSTMENTS AP 49-14 Base minus item 9 (Bag Lifts) $1,546,729.00 Boarding Bridge Base plus Additive Bid 1 $1,744,306.00 | Boarding Bridge Base Additive Bid 2 $1,661,340.00 | psa Bridge Base plus Additive Bid 1 &2 $1,858,917.00 Grant #2 {Bag Lifts 8-1, 8-2, B-3, and B-5 (item 9} $139,721.00} = Boarding Bridges Base BOARDING BRIDGES AND BAG LIFTS- Bid Tab.xlsx