READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Okaloosa County BOCC — February 16, 2016 — Final Pay Packet — reading text
Part 6 of 8. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Final Pay Packet — extracted reading text
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Known limitations
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
!
PA-04-FL-4177-PW-00327(0):
Completed Work:
Replaced Computer Network Switch Cat 3560V2 and (2) Transceivers and Cable; The Applicant used 27 hours of Force Account Labor to test
I
and repair the Network Switch and (2) Transceivers and cable for a cost of $602.69 including a Fringe Benefit Rate of 39.41 %. Supply Cost:
$4727.06 including Network Switch, (2) Transceivers and Network Cable; See Invoice and Purchase Order Attached.
Work to be Completed:
I
f
The Sub-Grantee Applicant has provided an estimate from \/\/lllo Products for $277,887.00 to replace the GEM-80 PLC system that was
damaged. The current system is outdated and parts are no longer available, therefore the entire control system will need to be replaced See
Applicant Memo regarding system replacement. Note: temporary repairs were completed using some remaining stock parts by Force Account
I
Labor to get minimal operation returned to the facility.
I
Cost includes design and replacing the Control Panels, Modules, Relays, Monitors, Intercom and Closed Circuit TV Interface. The existing
System Control is responsible to operate 189 swing doors, 7 roll up gates, 75 staff stations intercoms, 26 paging speakers, 5 internal phones and
40 CCTV cameras. See Attached Estimate from Willo Products. Estimated cost does not include replacement of intercom speakers, CCTV
cameras or the actual door locks. The existing hardware items will be integrated into the new control system.
Attachments:
a. Location Map
b. Photo Pages I
c. Estimate t
d. Time Sheet
e. Invoice
f. Firmette
I
g. DAC
j
PROJECT NOTES: r
Applicant states that this facility was not under warranty at the time of the declared event.
PROJECT COSTS AND CEF:
Costs in this project are based on a Contractor Proposal. Applicant will solicit competitive bids for this work. Because the proposal is based on a
lump sum amount, it is not possible to perform CEF on this project. "As lump-sum construction cost estimates do not meet the requirement for
quantitative estimates, lump sums are not acceptable
for preparing the CEF estimate." CEF for Large Projects
Instructional Guide V2.1, 4-4, Sept. 2009
(See attached email correspondence.)
Applicant has been advised that Grantee must be notified of any changes to the Scope of Work described in this project.
RECORD RETENTION: Complete records and cost documents for all approved work must be maintained for at least 5 years from the date the
last project was completed or from the date final payment was received, whichever is later. Applicant is responsible for retention of all
documentation associated with this project.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION: All of the documentation to support this project have been reviewed and verified by the Applicant and the
Project Specialist.
PROCUREMENT: The applicant is required to adhere to State Government Procurement rules and regulations and maintain adequate records to
support the basis for all purchasing of goods and materials and contracting services for projects approved under the Public Assistance program.
as stated in 44 CFR 13.36. The applicant has advised they have/will follow their normal procurement procedures.
PERMITS: The PA Project Specialist has advised the Applicant that it is their responsibility to obtain all applicable local, state and federal permits
prior to any construction or debris disposal activity referenced on this project. Applicant has also been advised that the lack of obtaining and
maintaining these documents may jeopardize funding.
INSURANCE: The applicant is aware that all projects are subject to an insurance review as stated in 44 C.F.R. Sections 206.252 and 206.253.lf
applicable an insurance determination will be made either as anticipated proceeds or actual proceeds in accordance with the applicant's
https://connectl.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo=isource.fema.net,SSL+dispatchDestination.do?... 12/2/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency E-Grants Page 11of13
insurance policy that may affect the total amount of the project.
DIRECT ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS: The sub grantee is requesting direct administrative costs that are directly chargeable to this specific
project. Associated eligible work is related to the administration of this PA project only and in accordance with 44 CFR 13.22. These costs are
treated consistently and uniformly in all federal awards and other sub grantee activities and are not included in any approved indirect cost rates.
The Sub-Grantee Applicant will claim Direct Administrative Cost. 26.5 hours were spent in direct preparation of this specific PW for a total cost of
$903.12 including 56.15% fringe benefit rate.
Does the Scope of Work change the pre-disaster conditions
at the site? Yes ~iNo
Special Considerations included? F0, Yes ' 1No
Hazard Mitigation proposal included? : Yes Y No Is there insurance coverage on this facility? ~Yes' No
PROJECT COST
ITEM CODE NARRATIVE QUANTITY/UNIT UNIT PRICE COST
*** Version D***
Work Completed
1 9007 Labor 1/LS $ 602.69 $602.69
2 9009 Material 1/LS $ 4,727.06 $4,727.06
Direct Administrative Costs
3 9901 1/LS $ 903.12 $ 903.12
(Subgrantee)
Work To Be Completed
4 9001 Contract 1/LS $ 277,887.00 $ 277,887.00
5 DODO Insurance Adjustments - 5900/5901 OILS $0.00 $0.00
*** Version 0 ***
Deduct Anticipated Insurance
6 5901 1/LS $ -233,216.75 $ -233,216.75
Proceeds
TOTAL COST $ 50,903.12
PREPARED BY Eleanor Conigo TITLE Project Specialist SIGNATURE
APPLICANT REP. Marcella Eubanks TITLE Contracts and Grants SIGNATURE
Manager
OKALOOSA (COUNTY): PA-04-FL-4177-PW-00327
Conditions Information
Review Name Condition Type Condition Name Description Monitored Status
Any change to the approved
scope of work will require re-
Standard
Final Review Other (EHP) evaluation for compliance with No Approved
Condition #1
NEPA and other Laws and
Executive Orders.
If ground disturbing activities occur
during construction, applicant will
monitor ground disturbance and if
Standard any potential archeological
Final Review Other (EHP) No Approved
Condition #3 resources are discovered, will
immediately cease construction in
that area and notify the State and
FEMA.
Final Review Other (EHP) Standard This review does not address all No Approved
Condition #2 federal, state and local
requirements. Acceptance of
federal funding requires recipient
https://connect 1.dhs.gov/emmie/,Danalnfo""'isource.fema.net, SSL+dispatchDestination.do? .. . 12/2/2014
Federal Emergency Management Agency £-Grants Page 12of13
OKALOOSA (COUNTY): PA-04-FL-4177-PW-00327
Conditions Information
to comply with all federal, state
and local laws. Failure to obtain all
appropriate federal, state and local
environmental permits and
clearances may jeopardize federal
funding.
If ground disturbing activities occur
during construction, applicant will
monitor ground
