READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Fort Walton Beach Council minutes — 08-28-1990 Budget Workshop — reading text
Part 1 of 3. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — fwb-3004-original.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
191
MINUTES OF THE COUNCIL BUDGET WORKSHOP MEETING
OF THE CITY OF FORT WALTON BEACH. FLORIDA
AUGUST 28. 1990
INTRODUCTION A budget workshop meeting of the
City Council of Fort
I
Walton Beach, Florida, was held Tuesday, August 28.
on
1990, at 5 : 30 p. m.. in the Council Chambers at City
Hall, with the following members present:
Mayor William J. Roberts. III
Councilmen: J. C. " Buck" Smith
Sid Rosenbaum
David deVaux
Jim Wyatt
Tom Maney
Cissy Wyninegar
Also Present: Chuck Keeler, City Manager; Billy Mikel,
Assistant City Manager; Charlie Evans, Finance Director;
Helen Spencer, City Clerk; Department Heads; news media
90/ 91 PROPOSED BUDGET The Mayor called the Budget Workshop to order and asked
the City Manager to present the reports regarding the
golf course fees and construction. Mr. Keeler stated
the Assistant City Manager would present the report on
fees and and the Golf Course Manager would present the
report for the construction of the additional 9 holes.
Mr. Mikel stated at the last meeting, Council instructed
the City Manager to bring back figures on the rate
structure as to where we are presently; fee increase and
the effect it would have on producing revenue. He
stated he and the Golf Course Manager had checked with
other golf courses in the area as to what they charged.
level of service provided and based on the Consumers
Price Index. the percentages were reflected on the sheet
provided. The increase shown would produce $ 279, 029.
additional revenue.
Mr. Mikel stated the present resident discount fee was
7. 04 and the proposed fee was $ 7. 98 or a 14% increase.
Mr. Rosenbaum wanted to know how they arrived at the
I
arbitrary percentages. Mr. Wyatt stated there were 950
non- resident and resident members with the average
member playing 102 rounds a year with the cost per round
being approximately $ 2. 56 and if we increased the user
fee to $ 2. 00 for residents and non- residents. the cost
per rounds works out to be $ 3. 50. This would generate
an additional $ 140, 000 over and above the number shown.
192
Budget Workshop 8- 28- 90
90/ 91 BUDGET ( CONT.) Mr. deVaux asked if there would be a substantial number
of members dropping out. Mr. Wyatt stated he had spent
some time with people from the US Golf and it was their
opinion we would not loose a single round. Mr.
Rosenbaum stated approach the he would consider would be
increasing the non- residents fee. Mr. Wyatt stated he
had no problem with that other than if you raise the
membership fee $ 20- 25 it might jeopardize losing members
where a $ 2. 00 user fee would not.
Mr. deVaux stated he looked at the golf course as a
recreational facility, a level of service, provided to
city residents. If we make it competitive with other
golf course than we should make it a country club and
get real
competitive. Mr. Wyatt stated we are not
competitive and we cannot raise taxes enough to cover
the budget, and we have to look for alternate ways to
raise revenue and what Mr. deVaux was saying is this a
level of service to the taxpayer and the catch 22 was we
either pay 15- 20% more in taxes or find other sources of
revenue.
Mr. Maney wanted to know if they had looked at what
other cities charged for their course and if we were
low. high or medium in comparison. Mr. Mikel stated we
are one of a few cities that have a
municipal course and
we are low. Mr. Maney asked if it had been considered
to raise our fees
comparable city
to Florida
what a in
that hasgolf a charges and determine
course the amount
of revenue that would produce. Mr. Mikel stated the
report they had submitted accomplished just that.
Council could reduce or increase the proposed fee. the
report was a starting point for Council.
Mrs. Wyninegar inquired as to whether it was common in
other cities to have some recreational facilities that
produced revenue to subsidized the budget. Mr. Mikel
stated in going back to Mr. deVaux' s question, the
determination has to be made by Council as to what
service you provide that are considered recreational
services and what is a revenue producing service. We
can only offer to you data to determine this. Mr. Wyatt
suggested they keep in mind during their evaluation that
we are going to be in a position of plowing new ground,
simply because a lot of the expenses we are going to
incur we have to find revenue to cover because they have
not been mandated before. We have to look at how to
cover them and we come to the realization that taxes
cannot do it.
Mr. Rosenbaum stated he felt the senior membership
category was wrong, it was too cheap. Mr. Maney stated
