READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Fort Walton Beach Council agenda — 03-12-13--regular — reading text
Part 11 of 72. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — fwb-31685-original.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
29
T 118
Z
123 121 11! 117 115 r•
131
DRIVE N. W. 113 ,; • a j
IS! 166 a ; 113 4 >' 114
121 122 120 z IIB
10 a'
0 is
153 132,• 4 ....
ar.. • rw . ....... •..
a: tr. 110 UI -
a• • -
112
11 .2
Subject: 2013 -9 Support for CCNA
ATTACHMENTS:
CCNA Resolution Executive Summary ( PDF)
Senate Bill 1002 - CCNA ( PDF)
SIGNATURE BLOCK
Carole Jones Completed 03/ 04/ 2013 2: 29 PM
Carole Jones Completed 03/ 04/ 2013 2: 30 PM
Completed 03/ 06/ 2013 7: 46 PM
City Manager
City Council Pending
noC In: 2224
Page 1
11 .2
RESOLUTION ( ID # 2224)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF FORT WALTON BEACH, FLORIDA,
DECLARING SUPPORT FOR PROPOSED CHANGES TO SECTION 287. 055 OF THE
FLORIDA STATUTES, ALSO KNOWN AS " THE CONSULTANTS' COMPETITIVE
NEGOTIATION ACT ", AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FORT WALTON BEACH, FLORIDA THAT:
WHEREAS, local and state agencies throughout Florida are experiencing severe and
significant reductions in revenue; and
WHEREAS, professional services agreements constitute a significant public expenditure;
and
WHEREAS, many local and state agencies throughout the United States routinely
compare fees among competing firms before selecting a professional consultant, including
architects and engineers; and
WHEREAS, current Florida law prohibits local and state agencies from competitively
comparing professional services fees and related costs; and
WHEREAS, several public organizations including the Florida Association of Counties,
the Florida Governmental Finance Officers Association, the Florida Association of Public
Procurement Officers and the National Institute of Government Purchasing support the use of
alternative procurement methods for the acquisition of professional services; and
WHEREAS, the proposed change would modify the existing state law and would give
local and state agencies the discretion to competitively compare fees and make a best value
selection that considers qualifications and price among pre -qualified firms.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF FORT WALTON BEACH, FLORIDA:
That the City of Fort Walton Beach supports the proposed changes to the Consultant' s
Competitive Negotiation Act to allow local and state agencies to procure professional services on
a " best value basis" as set forth in the enclosed language.
Mike Anderson, Mayor
Attest Approved for form, legal sufficiency
ket pg. 30
11 . 2
RESOLUTION ( ID # 2224)
Helen Spemeer, City Clerk Hayward Dykes, Jr., City Attomey
11. 2. a
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Resolution of support to amend the Consultants Competitive Negotiation Act ( or
CCNA ").
OBJECTIVE: To improve public procurement in the state of Florida.
CONSIDERATIONS: Under Florida law, state and local governments are prohibited from
considering price when selecting consultants who provide specific professional services
architecture, engineering, landscape architecture, surveying and mapping). Instead, agencies z
u
are required to rank ( select) firms based strictly upon qualifications. Price is then negotiated with
the top- ranked firm with no knowledge of what the other firms might charge for the work. o
While this method of procurement may be advantageous under certain circumstances, it o
a
prevents the County or its citizens from ever being able to directly compare fee proposals in the
initial contracting process. Accordingly, several professional associations within Florida ( and w
m
across the country) are seeking to change the law to allow public entities the discretion to
continue to use the existing " qualifications -based selection" process or to utilize an alternative o
best value" method. Under the alternative method, firms would be ranked according to
qualifications as they are presently. The top- ranked firms would then be invited to submit a fee T
2
proposal. The top firms would then be re- evaluated considering qualifications and price with the "
latter being weighted at not more than 50 percent of the total award criteria.
The list of groups supporting the proposed legislation includes the following entities:
The Florida Association of Counties ( FAC)
The Florida Association of Public Purchasing Officers ( FAPPO)
r The Florida Government Finance Officers Association ( FGFOA)
The National Institute of Government Purchasing ( NIGP)
The Southeast Florida Chapter of NIGP
Y Wakulla County
v Sarasota County
Y Lee County
St. Lucie County
Several public professional engineers through out Florida
The Board has previously endorsed the proposed change as part of its annual state legislative
agenda.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item has been reviewed and approved by the County
Attorney' s Office. This is not quasi -judicial and as such requires only majority vote. This item is
legally sufficient for Board action. - CMG
FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this Executive Summary.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no impact on the Growth Management Plan.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners adopts the enclosed
Resolution of support to amend the Consultant' s Competitive Negotiation Act ( or " CCNA "),
PREPARED BY: Steve Carrell, Purchasing /General Services Director
i et P
Florida Senate - 2013
SB 1002 F 11 2' b
By Senator Soto
20131002_
14- 01249 - 13
A bill to be entitled
An act relating to the procurement of professional
architectural, engineering, landscape architectural,
or surveying and mapping services; amending s.
287. 055, F. S.; revising the definition of the term
continuing contract" and defining the term " best
value selection "; clarifying provisions with respect
to selection of firms by an agency under the
competitive selection, process; providing that an
agency has the right to reject any or all submissions
received in response to a public announcement under
the competitive selection process; authorizing an
agency to award contracts to multiple firms under the
competitive negotiation process; providing for a best
value selection process; requiring agencies to adopt
rules governing the use of the process; providing
minimum requirements with respect to
