READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Fort Walton Beach Council minutes — 11-05-2001 Workshop — reading text
Part 1 of 1. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — fwb-3485-original.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
291
MINUTES OF TIlE COUNCIL WORKSHOP MEETING
OF TIlE CITY OF FORT WALTON BEACH, FWRIDA
NOVEMBER 5, 2001
INTRODUCTION
A Workshop Meeting of the City Council of Fort Walton Beach, Florida. was held on Monday, November 5, 2001, at
5: 30 p.m. at the Senior Citizens Center located at 31 Memorial Parkway, with the following members present:
Mayor Glenda Glover
I Councilmen: Clay Carnathan, Janet Baggett, Jim Dowling, Jim Tucker, Dr. Wayne Pullen, Chuck Kelley, and Mike
Anderson.
Also Present: Reid Silverboard, City Manager; Helen Spencer, City Clerk; Jason Hull, City Attorney's Office; Joyce
Shanahan, Finance Director; Department Directors; and Herb Marlowe, Facilitator.
CALL TO ORDER
The Mayor called the meeting to order to discuss the CRA issue.
CRA ISSUE
The City Manager advised the CDS Director will give a brief review on the history of the CRA and the Finance Director
will briefly review the financial aspects of the CRA.
CRA HISTORY IN FORT WALTON BEACH
The CDS Director showed a series of slides to review previous presentations on the CRA which included the goals of
the City, the CRA objectives; the history of the CRA Board; why the CRA was slow in starting; the current status of the
CRA; the current boundaries, the current Plan and Public input sessions; the Vision Plan Recommendations in 1994; the
CRA Plan UpdatelUrban Master Plan; the Economic Development projects; the CRA Plan UpdatelUrban Master Plan,
Transportation and Streetscape element; and where the dollars could come & om.
Discussion included an exchange of views on the goal to reverse deteriorating trends; the incentives to improve
property, i.
e. residential rehab, putty and paint, and landscape grant for commercial
properties; and financial incentives
for commercial businesses to go downtown.
FINANCIAL REVIEW
The Finance Director gave a brief slide presentation to review previous presentations on the City General FWld Revenue
and Expenses and the CRA Funds and Expenses which included the sales tax generated in the area and received, the TIF
calculations for the original area and the expanded area, the CRA expenditures, CRA issues and facts, and how to
maximize revenues.
CRA ISSUES
Mr. Marlowe recalled this is the meeting at which Council is to arrive at a decision for closure, and at the end of this
meeting COWlcil can decide if a meeting tomorrow evening is needed. He noted there are four choices: 1) Continue
with the current CRA; 2) Council act as the CRA Board; 3) A Public Referendum; and 4) Abolish the CRA. Council
discussed the advantages and disadvantages of each choice.
Alternative I: Continue with the current CRA - opinions of advantages mentioned included it is a
funding source and
provides stability; opinions of disadvantages mentioned included it does not pay its fair share of overhead, the CRA has
special dollars, it could be portrayed as special treatment,the CRA has special powers, conflict of interests, members do
I
not have to be a citizen of Fort Walton Beach to be on the CRA Board, and
people could take advantage of their
position.
Alternative 2: Council act as the CRA Board - opinions of advantages mentioned included Council would be in
charge,
it eliminates a step in the process; elected officials would be in would eliminate
charge, of the CRA and the
redundancy
MPB, it would be more political, and it may bring more
people into the process; opinions of the disadvantages
mentioned included it would lose expertise and continuity, the MPB may be the
wrong mix, it will require more Council
time, historically the community has been against Council as CRA,and it is
politicized.
Alternative 3: Public Referendwn - opinions of advantages mentioned included it will
get the public view and get public
debate, and it will pl."
ovide closure; opinions of disadvantages mentioned included there would be no
public benefit to
abolish the CRA, it could leave gap, and it would be an opportunity to disperse misinformation.
292 11- 5- 01
CRA ISSUES cont.
Alternative 4: Abolish the CRA - opinions of advantages mentioned included potentially lower taxes, it is possible there
would be no negative impact on development; opinions of disadvantages mentioned included it will leave a gap, there
would be no public benefit, the City would lose a funding source, taxes don' t go down, services don' t go up, will have to
either cut services or raise taxes, major accomplishments wilI not occur, redevelopment efforts will lose energy, and the
City will have to return County dollars.
During discussion there was mention of an Alternative 5 - to expand the CRA and make the whole City a CRA area.
Following discussion on the opinions of the advantages and disadvantages of the Alternatives, Mr. Marlowe asked each
member which alternative they would choose. Dr. Pullen chose Alternative 3 - Public Referendum, but could accept
Alternative 1 - Continue with the current CRA; Chuck KelIey chose Alternative I - Continue with the current CRA;
Mike Anderson chose Alternative 3 - Public Referendum; Mayor Glover expressed her preference for Alternative I -
Continue with the current CRA; Clay Carnathan chose Alternative 1 - Continue with the current CRA; Janet Baggett
chose Alternative 1 - Continue with the current CRA; Jim Dowling chose Alternative I - Continue with the current
CRA; and Jim Tucker chose Alternative 2 - Council act as the CRA.
Mr. Marlowe noted the majority of Council at this time wants to continue with the current system and recognized there
will be an election in fifteen months and a new Council may take their own direction. He expressed concern that
Council will continue to argue over this issue for the next fifteen months.
Council discussed a course of action over the next four months. Mr. Tucker said CmUlcil should direct staff to find as
many ways as it can to spend the CRA money so that its enhances the entire community not just property owners
downtown, such as completing the Landing Park improvements and finding a way to support the Library. Following up
on this Mr. Carnathan agreed and suggested taking the balance of the CRA funds to complete Phases 2 and 3 of the
Landing, bond the TIF funds to get the Landing completed and relieve pressure elsewhere and put some money back
into paying for the Library. Mr. Tucker agreed and stated it should be placed on the agenda. Further these things should
be done during the next 15 months to get the projects completed and stop spending money on some of the other projects
like the Brooks Street improvement. There was a consensus of Councilmembers to find ways to build the public assets
for the enhancement of the entire community as suggested.
Mr. Marlowe summarized the Council's consensus that the referendum issue would be set aside for now, and over the
next four months find as many ways as can to use CRA funds to maximize public investment for the benefit of the
entire community. The City Manager is to create as many mechanisms for public investment as he can that will benefit
the entire community. All agreed.
There was consensus of Council that a Special Council meeting tomorrow evening is not needed.
ADJOURNMENT
Being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 7: 35 p. m.
MDJ
MA YOR:
