READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Fort Walton Beach Council agenda — 04-11-06 Regular — reading text
Part 8 of 22. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — fwb-10157-original.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
than 50%
the three parcels to redevelop if more
to amend the non- conforming language to allow
West to remain
ordinance is to allow the Presidio and 200
destroyed. She advised the goal of this etc. 0 r if t hey a re
wners c an obtain mortgages, insurances,
legally at their height sop roperty 0
destroyed by a hurricane or other occurrence.
the
in between, the City has been advised by
The CDS Director stated that regarding the vacant parcel be further
will no
not exceed the height of the Presidio, there
military that as long as any building does to
she advised that Staff felt it was easiest
degradation to the mission of Eglin. With this in mind,
ordinance.
exempt properties and state so in the
but stated the
the differing heights of the three parcels,
She informed the MPB was concerned about
middle parcelwould fall closer to 200 West as far as height.
probably
of fact which
in their recommendation the findings
The City Attorney explained that Staff included not include those
while the MPB recommendation does
justifies the exemption of the three properties,
findings of fact.
The Mayor opened the public hearing.
Regular Council 3- 28- 06
155
ORD. 1701 ( CONTI
Bob Lee requested that the issue of view corridors be addressed if the
height is lowered to 70 feet, and
spoke against the exemption to the three parcels at 150 feet.
Mike Crew advised he voluntarily lowered his
project to 110 feet to confirm with Eglin' s mission, and
stated if there are any exclusions or
special exceptions for these properties, he wants the same
exception for his project. Mr. Crew discussed his concerns regarding Staff
stated in the Comprehensive Plan, which states the maximum
going against what is
height shall be 150 feet.
Gary Vorbeck discussed the fact that the effect of the ordinances on the properties has not been
addressed.
As there was no one else who wished to
speak, the public hearing was closed.
Mr. Patterson moved to adopt Ord. 1701 on first Dr. Pullen seconded motion.
reading.
Dr. Pullen amended the motion to state there will be no
exceptions to the 70 feet height limit except
those buildings which are already built or
permitted, namely, 200 West and the Presidio. Mr. Patterson
accepted the amendment.
The Mayor explained that the amendment would exclude the vacant
property between 200 West and
the Presidio, and that when developed it would be to be 70 feet.
required
The City Attorney advised since Mr. Patterson
accepted the amendment, that stands as an original
motion. She informed Lines 128 through 135 would have to be deleted, and to add
n
the phrase "and as
currently built, to Line 105, for the ordinance to state there are no exceptions.
Mr. Patterson moved to adopt Ord. 1701 on first
reading, deleting Lines 128 through 135, and
adding the phrase " and as currently built" to Line 105. Dr. Pullen seconded motion.
Council received clarification that the motion would allow
protection for all units in that zoning that are
presently constructed or under permit to be constructed that exceed the 70- foot height limit.
The Mayor called for the vote on the motion and it carried
by a vote of 4 to 3 with Patterson,
Pullen, Hartwell, and Minich in favor and Holmes, and Tucker
Campbell, opposed.
Some members of Council expressed their concerns in
regards to these ordinances, and the City
Attorney advised that the height issue can be re- addressed by Council in the future.
QUASI JUDICIAL AGENDA- SITE PLAN APPROVAL, ALTAVISTA CONDOS
Consideration of Site Plan Approval for Altavista Condominium for a mixed- use office/ resort
condominium development located at 220 Miracle Strip
Parkway SW by Mike Crew, applicant for
property owner, Crews Investment Miracle Strip, LLC.
The City Attorney announced a quasi-
judicial proceeding and swore in those individuals who planned
to testify.
Peggy Fowler, Planner, explained the project as a mixed- use office/ resort/residential condominium
which are permitted uses in the MUW- 24 district, and that it meets
requirements of the Comprehensive
Plan, the LOC, and the CRA recommended with
approval conditions.
Ms. Fowler also discussed issues
concerning cross access easements, calculation of parking, and
height, and added these issues were addressed "at the CRA meeting.
As there was no objection, the Staff Report was entered and
accepted into the record.
3- 28- 06
Regular Council
156
ALT AVISTA ( CONTI
Mike Crew, applicant, advised that agreements are in place with Pirates Bay to cover the Altavista' s
sharing of parking and egress, but if the City requires more, they will work with the attorney for Pirates
Bay, John Townsend. Mr. Townsend was present and confirmed Mr. Crews' comments.
Mr. Crew distributed a revised color rendering of the project, with the addition of cars and people in
order to see the scale of the first floor, and a drawing of the partial north elevation, which were marked
as Exhibit 1.Exhibit 2 was a drawing of the architectural site plan with the portico, and Exhibit 3 was a
revised drawing of the north elevation.
Mr. Crew explained that the project has extra parking and it his intention to have half the units for
permanent housing and the other half for transient lodging. Mr. Crew stated with the future influx of
military personnel into the area, this would allow the flexibility for housing for those on TDY, while
allowing for permanent housing as well.
Also discussed was that the project is in the traffic exemption area.
Mr. Crew introduced Jeff Prescott with Prescott Architects and Ed Stanford, site engineer with Jenkins
Stanford Associates, and presented their qualifications as expert witnesses regarding the project.
There were no questions from Council for either witness.
Mr. Crew summarized that the projects meets all of the City' s requirements, has been approved
unanimously by the CRA and Staff, and that he is willing to work with his neighbors on issues of
parking, etc. He requested approval from Council for the site plan.
Dick Gercak, 214 Miracle Strip Parkway, Pirates Bay UnitA, expressed his concerns regarding parking
and the required number of spaces; the boundary/property line of Pirates Bay; and the elimination of
the curb cuts on the Pirates Bay lot.
When questioned by Council, the City Attorney reiterated that this project is not affected by the
proposed height ordinance as the ordinance has not yet gone through second reading, and that the
applicant was aware of the height issue, and she sees no reason to deny the project. She further
advised that anything with a development permit or existing at the time is grandfathered in, and if
Council approves the site plan tonight, a permit would withstand the height ordinance.
Mr. Minich moved to approve the site plan for Altavista Condominium, to be located at 20
Miracle Strip Parkway subject to the following conditions: Note: This recommendation is based
upon the application and site plan developed by Jenkins, Stanford & Associates, Inc. (project
1050. 06. 001, dated February 10, 2006) and the architectural drawings and elevations
developed by Prescott Architects, Inc. ( project #2601 dated 1/ 20/ 06).
1. Prior to issuance of a building permit:
a) The applicant agrees to work with staff to allow for a 14- foot first floor elevation, more
windows on the first three floors, and more articulation and detail on the upper six
floors in order to "... assist in creating a pedestrian- friendly environment that is
distinct from the suburban character of surrounding communities" ( Urban Master
Plan). The applicant agrees to work with staff to extend the portico the width of the
front drive only if it does not reduce the number of parking spaces.
b) The site plan and conceptual landscape drawings that are affected by the addition of
a portico shall also be revised.
c) The project shall meet the requirements of LDC Section 12. 100. 03, Archaeological
Resource Review, and Historical Preservation Act, as adopted February 28, 2006.
Kegular Council
3- 28- 06
157
ALTAVISTA ( CONTI
d) A landscape plan
prepared by a professional landscape architect or
be submitted and nurseryman must
approved by CDS staff. The plan must with
