READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Fort Walton Beach Council minutes — 02-12-1991 Regular — reading text
Part 8 of 10. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — fwb-3065-original.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
The first step was to do survey, which has been
a
done in a very professional manner; the next step is to
analyze it and find out where to go from here. In
answer to the question is the CRA concept. is a CRA the
best thing to improve the quality of life in the
downtown Fort Walton Beach area, it is the best thing
they can think of and know of at this time. He asked
Council to allow the Board to continue to function in
the way they are and keeping Council informed of What is
going on. as they have in the past, and he asked
Council' s support and help to funnel citizens input to
the Board. Once they have made those decisions and the
Board has analyzed it. they will return and, perhaps.
say that should be the case; but he thinks they need
some time to do that because the citizens deserve it.
Mr. deVaux expressed that input is mostly needed from
the property owners in the downtown CRA area; if the
property owners themselves will not contribute to
revitalize downtown, then there is nothing else that can
be done. Mr. Stiles agreed and said it needs to be
decided what function the downtown area is to perform,
certain fundamental questions need to be asked. Mr.
deVaux felt the downtown property owners should be asked
for input, if they are willing to change and what they
are going to contribute; their input is needed the most.
Mr. Wyatt said CRA is presently doing research regarding
multi- use facilities downtown, and that could have a
bigger impact than just the owners of property there; if
it is 80, 000 the CRA, that is money well
I
an $ expense to
spent if it creates a new market. He would like to be
sure their original focus of
trying to determine What is
best for the overall picture does not get lost on the
focusing of what each owner wants to do.
Mr. Maney asked Dr. Walker if he had anything to
supplement what Mr. Stiles had said, and if he agreed
with everything Mr. Stiles said. Dr. Walker had no
disagreement with anything Mr. Stiles had to say and had
nothing to add unless there were questions.
284
2- 12- 91
CRA ( CONT . ) Mr. Maney asked if Dr. Walker had asked any graduate
students to analyze it as an exercise, and if so. what
they had come up with. Dr. Walker replied he had not
asked any to do so but he has heard in the
department
that some of them are doing that as independent projects
of their own. Maney thought it would be useful for
Mr.
the CRA, as well as Council. to have that input because
it would be completely and totally objective. Dr.
Walker assured him that Mr. Stiles could keep in touch
with any such analysis and report them to Council.
Mr. Nicholson asked if Mr. Stiles was aware of the
members on the CRA who do not support the program; Mr.
Rosenbaum implied there are members on the CRA who think
it should be abolished. Mr. Stiles answered no. he has
not heard. Mr. Nicholson said everyone he has talked to
on the CRA were very supportive of the program, and they
seem to think the direction they are going is proper,
and he is reading that Mr. Rosenbaum is implying to the
public that people of the Board itself are not
supportive of the CRA and think it should be halted.
Mr. Rosenbaum said that is not what he said. Mr. Stiles
said he did not understand Mr. Rosenbaum to say that.
but if he did. he would have to say he could not
substantiate that because his opinion of the Board is
that they are a very conscientious, hard working.
dedicated group this with
of citizens who are going into
an open mind trying to find out what is best to do.
Mr. Rosenbaum stated, for the record. what he said was
he knew of members of the Board who have certain
reservations about the continuance of the CRA, he did
not say they were not supportive of it; they have done a
yeoman' s job on the survey. and he thinks it is a good
survey. He said it shows for instance, as he already
pointed overwhelming support of consolidation;
out, the
it they think it should be financed by a bond
also shows
issue but it does not tell how the bond issue is going
to be paid off, and that gives him problems too. Mr.
Stiles said, on the question of the bond issue, not to
forget what they have are citizen responses to
questions, either open ended questions or how do you
feel questions; there was no intention to go into great
detail. that will come down the road; there is still a
lot of analysis to do to figure out what is practical,
what is possible, and what the priorities should be.
The Mayor remarked that consideration of consol ida tion
and the bond issue were not in the motion; the motion is
to dissolve the CRA. He sees a Board that has worked as
hard, or harder, they have had; and the
than any Board
reason Mr. Rosenbaum supported disbanding the Council
was to get the citizens involved. He expressed
bewilderment that now, all of a sudden, less than a year
after formation, he is willing to throw it away.
2- 12- 91
285
CRA ( CONT . ) Mr. Rosenbaum said he has never been supportive of the
Council serving as CRA, and he has never heretofore
suggested dissolving the CRA. He said this group has
done a job, but the survey does not come up with
super
the support they indicated to Council they wanted to
see, in his viewpoint. The Mayor said he thought Mr.
Rosenbaum
