READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Fort Walton Beach Council minutes — 02-12-1991 Regular — reading text
Part 7 of 10. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — fwb-3065-original.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
residence and shows that even in Fort Walton
Beach, 64% favor complete merger, and 71% favor
consolidation of services. Mr. Rosenbaum expressed his
personal opinion that the reason consolidation has not
moved any faster is not the fault of the employees, but
it is the political body that holding up the merger.
is
He remarked it seems very interesting that the general
public. assuming the accuracy of the survey, would like
to see a merger. He said it seems there is an abiding
lack of interest on the part of the public on what the
CRA is doing. He noted. for instance. on page 15, far
down on the list is the six acres, 7th in priority of
most important facing Fort Walton Beach; on
problems
page 17, table 21, most important thing that should be
done to improve Fort Walton Beach, it shows that improve
traffic, improve appearance represent 59% of the
respondents, and other things as improve/ increase
businesses, build a civic center, and 59% still do not
address the functions of a CRA; same thing on table 22,
on page 18. which he believed city is Fort Walton Beach
respondents only; table questions the ratings 23, which
of selected strategies for downtown improvement, the
first strategy of a business nature, by his
interpretation, is attract hotel/ marina complex and the
rest are build a library, create a festival site, and so
and he has argument with any of those; tables
I
on, no on
24 and 25, the question preferences regarding use of
on
the six acres, most people want it. evidently as a park.
and it already happens to concur that
is a park; and he
is probably the City property at this
best use for the
time; then 27, roles in downtown development. 6th on the
list is the Community Redevelopment Agency.
282
2- 12- 91
CRA ( CONT . ) Mr. Rosenbaum said what all this comes to is, he is of
the moderately strong feeling that the survey shows the
public does not feel enthusiastic about the CRA. He
said when the concept of the survey came up. it was
presented to Council in the manner that the CRA would
like to know, and
candidly said, they cannot do anything
if they do not have public support and they need to find
out what the public support is or if, whether or not,
there is any, and he thinks that is a noble and splendid
idea. He said the question was massaged so much that
the respondents never had an opportunity in the survey
to say. yes I think CRA should press on, or no they
should pack up; it clearly was not asked. He said
further, it is a pretty good expense on the City he
thinks they no longer can afford; it costs in excess of
80, 000. 00 over and above the County contribution to
maintain a budget. which does not consider the debt
service.
The Finance Director said the City receives about
80, 000 from the County; the CRA budget is approximately
160, 000. Mr. Rosenbaum said if the County contribution
of $ 80, 000 was given up and the CRA was given up, there
is another $ 80. 000 that would not be spent; the City has
the debt to meet regardless, but he is not addressing
that. He said all this comes down to. the big question
in his mind, and he knows in the mind of some of the
members of the CRA Board. what is the usefulness. what
is the future, and he cannot get positive answers or
affirmative answers to that.
Mr. Rosenbaum. moved to abolish the Ordinance for the eRA
ediately. or as soon as possible. Motion was
seconded by Mr. Maney.
Mr. Maney asked if the CRA, as an organization. has
discussed the issues brought up by Mr. Rosenbaum. and if
so, what are the thoughts of the group.
Tom Stiles, Executive Director of CRA, explained when
the survey was commissioned, the objective was a high
quality, highly reliable bench mark survey that could be
used by the city and other organizations to determine
what should be the focus and direction for downtown Fort
Walton Beach. They feel that as a result of the work
that was done, with the assistance and under the
direction of Dr. Walker of the Whitman Center, the
University of West Florida, that has been done. During
the survey it was found that the citizens were very
enthusiastic in what they said. He said it is clear
from results of the survey that people want action and
want things to change. and
A meet ing with Dr. Walker
the supervisor of the individuals who tock the survey
was held the day the survey was publicly released; the
CRA did not come to any conclusions at that time.
283
2- 12- 91
CRA ( CONT . ) Safely speaking for the CRA Board, Mr. Stiles said they
feel their role is to analyze the survey, review it
carefully, study it, try to take it apart and figure out
what it actually says. They will then look and see what
is possible, what is practical to do, and what the
priorities should be. There is a need for more citizen
input, and for input from Council as well; they have
I
started a program of talking to the citizens to get the
word out about the survey; they do not know where they
are going to go at this time. He recalled that one year
ago the Business Climate Committee came to Council and
made several recommendations on what needs to be done.
At that time Council decided to listen to the citizens
and voted to form a citizens CRA. The Board has worked
very hard since then to find out what the citizens
want.
