Fort Walton Beach Council agenda — 01-14-03 regular Council agenda — reading text

expl~~ d the RotaIy Club proposed park on the old Sound Restaurant property and expertise of the members to guaiantee a is representative of the finest in leadership and can provide resources will allow her to submit the needed successful partnership, and a vote of support from Council on the project paperwork to the Rotary International. with the City in the development of the park on Mrs. Baggett moved to allow tbe Rotary Club to partnenhip Council when tbey are ready. MI'. Carnathan the Sound property and to bring their recommendations to seconded motion.  12/ 10/ 02 204 Wf~~ t}';;~\' 0 iJ< ,~~....... i1.~:S? J i~~~~~..">.:..;, z:.. the State for the park that the City must rU~;":'::'> hI'":,..&.> 15 a Management Plan approved by The City Manager explained there and technical support. of the Plan the Club can provide financial follow, but believes that within the parameters the City be subject to a claim. is insured for that type of activity should Council received clarification that the City Carnathan, Baggett, Dowling, The Mayor called for the vote on the motion and it carried unanimously with in favor. Tucker, Pullen, Kelley, and Anderson SE and 105 Shell Avenue, SE. and did not anticipate any objections to the item. The City Attorney announced a quasi-judicial proceeding Council might have. Patrick Clements, property owner, was available to answer any questions record. The Mayor announced the Staff Report into the record. Flinn Fagg, Planner, entered the Staff Report into the Avenue Studio townhomes Development at 102- 104 Church Dr. Pullen moved to approve the site plan for the SE and 105 Shell Avenue, SE, subject to the following conditions: This approval is based on the site plan, stamped and sealed on 10/ 30/ 02, and the building plans, 1) with this other documentation submitted in conjunction stamped and sealed on 10/ 4/ 02, and all be reviewed in conformance issued for the development of the project shall application. Any permits with the approved plans. the sewer line on Shell Avenue at the time 2) The applicant shall pay for the $7, 036. 46 cost of extending Townhomes Subdivision. of development of lots 17- 20 of the Studio The applicant shall relocate and reconnect the sewer line to the Studio Arms Condominiums upon 3) Townhomes Subdivision, and shall provide copies of the development of Lots 1- 8 of the Studio Division. associated easement documentation to the Engineering Avenue, and 4) Standard driveway turn-out curbing shall be provided at the street connections on Shell the associated cross- slope shall conform to ADA requirements. and Church Avenue in 5) Sidewa]ks shall be installed in the public rights-of- way on Shell Avenue Code. accordance with Section 20- 755 of the Land Development shall clarified legal description to the Engineering Division for the northwest 6) The applicant provide a of Lots 17- 20 of the Studio boundary of the Studio Arms Condominiums upon development Townhomes Subdivision. when not in use. 7) The roll-out trash containers shall be stored within the unit garages it carried unanimously with Carnathan, Baggett, Dowling, Tucker, Mr. Carnathan seconded motion and Pullen, Kelley, and Anderson in favor. trees in front of the buildings at 184 and 215 Miracle Strip Consideration of a request to remove the Bradford pear Parkway, SE. in Nabors has requested to remove two Bradford pear trees Flinn Fagg, Planner IT with the City, advised that Bonnie The one in front of 215 Miracle Strip Parkway, SE. City front of the building at 184 Miracle Strip Parkway and the contract for the tree removal services due to the liability issues involved. As a Attorney recommended City to the City to pay for result,property owners removal of trees on their own will need to provide a deposit requesting the tree removal and replacement services. rootball of $1, 200. 00, which includes $ 200. 00 for the tree and Mr. Fagg infonned that Staff is requiring a deposit 00 for the tree tree well, and a cost range of $350. 00 to $ 750. removal, $ 150. 00 for the installation of pavers in the after the work will be returned to the property owner replacement, based on the tree variety. Any remaining funds has been completed. until for watering the replacement trees upon installation Mr. Fagg also advised the applicant shall be responsible the tree fail to be the to replace the tree should also be responsible for cost irrigation is installed. The applicant shall watered properly. 12/ 10/ 02 205' t" li,~.~~~:: U[ k"...~.....~ r~2ill1J: u:i3: n: Sf:r:ili;;:: to the deposit fee, advising she Mr. Fagg repOrted Ms. Nabors, who was unable to attend tonight' s meeting, objects removal but the additional funds for the cost of a replacement tree. has no prbblenf paying for the tree objected to be returned to the applicant. Council received clarification that if no tree is required to be replaced, the money would Staff to accomplish the task of Discussion included the $ 1, 200. 00 amount for the deposit is an estimate derived by the tree removal and replacement. . individual wanting to go ahead of Dr. Pullen moved to reduce the amount of the deposit to $ 500. 00 per tree With the for tree removal return their deposit. Mr. Tucker seconded motion. the process receiving a on as it will take care of Council stated the opinion that $ 1, 200.00 is a reasonable amount for the tree replacement plan any problems that may occur dming the process. and that at this Discussion included whether!CRA funding will be approved to pay for the tree replacement plan ' part of the plan is not mown. time the