READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Fort Walton Beach Council agenda — 06-24-03 regular Council agenda — reading text
Part 38 of 87. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — fwb-9740-original.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
p0SOdoJd
do!0^
0CI
l"
IJd! dUll . I I I
s
I
iI, J ~ ~~
i! ~ I")
g
ai ~
Ij ~ '" ":
t:
I.
if ~g 1 I. I
II!
R ~~
m \.... ~ 3\
~
i ~! ~ i
i gl ~ r !
1.t-
i II,
fi I II; oq:~~
i i Ii ~
1111
nuiU ·~ Ii ! 15.
IU
i tj ~"
I
II ";
u^ h ~ ,
J;
v~
I Itn
DO DO 8~ ID t><
l!ia
u ,!
9~ ii~ r1I11III n
mmIiJ,! ~ In I I
0
IV
II 11111 Ii n~ i
I 11111 ifi~ !. ~.
Iii mll dB Ii ill
l~ nn III ! I ili II ~!
Q.
0 a~
a:
Q.
I~ In n
J''''
f"~
tI'
I!
5'"
r?-
80~
c
2
Q.
a
E
CITY OF FORT WALTON BEACH
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
Date: June 4, 2003
To: Reid Silverboa.nL City Manager
Via: Missy McKim,Dire~ Or. .. , r .
From: Malcolm H.Foley, ~~, vSUPervisor, Zoning & Building Division
Subject: Request for Site Plan Approval- MTM Development
238-244 Brooks Street ( 03-02- RD)
BACKGROUND:
On May 7, 2003, the CRA Board of Commissioners recommended conditional approval ( 5- 0, 2
absent) of the site plan as indicated on page 2 & 3, herein. .
REOUEST:
The property owner, MI'M Development, lLC, requests site plan approval for a residential
condominium development at 238- 244 Brooks Street SE. The architect is Blinn Van Mater,
The proposed. project consists of the consolidation of three abutting parcels of property in order
to develop a residential condominium project comprised of a total of 43 residences, made up of
single unit, two unit and multiple unit buildings on 3. 45 acres of land. The project will be
developed as a condominium, with a homeowner' s association that will own. and maintain the
property. .
Five ( 5) multiple unit buildings ( 5 units each) and a duplex: (total of 27 units) will be built over-
looking Santa Rosa Sound, with each typical 5- unit building consisting of three habitable floors
over one level ofbelow grade parking. The width of these 3- story J> uildings will be 78 feet with
a height of35 feet. The rerrl~ 1n'
ng 16 units ( single unit, duplex
8 1 and 2 triplexes) will front on
Brooks Street or an interior private drive. The private drive will provide two (2) access points.
onto Brooks Street with a. cul- de- sac at the westerly portion of the site.
DISCUSSION:
Section 20-683 of the Land Development Code requires site plan review by the CRA.Board for
all commercial and multifamily. development in the CRA with a recommendation to the
area.,
City COl,UlCil. The Board may recommend approval of the application as submitted, approval
with conditions, or disapproval. .
Staff has reviewed the proposed project for consistency with the Updated Community
Redevelopment Plan,the Land Development Code and the Comprehensive Plan. Staff's findings
are detailed in the attached " Staff Analysis and Report." -
The property is currently zoned MUW- 12, Mixed-Use Waterfront District, and' the proposed
10f3-
multi- family development ( condominium) is a main permitted use. The
development is also
consistent with the Comprehensive. Plan Future Land Use Map designation for the
property
MUW- 12). . .
The proposed strUctures will be in conformance with the height, setback, view corridor and lot
coverage . requirements stipulated by the MUW -12 zoning regulations, and' the site plan
demonstrates. ~ the development will also meet the number of parking spaces
required by
code.
Ata rotal af43 units1 density for the project is 12.43 units per gross acre. The base density in the
MUW -12. district is 12 units per acre, although density bonuses may be awarded for
up to 15
maximum units per acre. Since the development"s density is in excess of the base ( 12 units.
per
acre), density bonuses must be identifh~ d by the applicant, recommended for approval by the
CRA Board and approved by the City Council.
A sidewalk will be provided by the developer along Brooks Street as a
public amemty; easement
documentation for this amenity will need to be provided to the City. Stormwater management
has not been designed at this time. The Solid Waste Division will review and approve the final
location and specifications for solid waste disposaL
The property is identified as being located within the Archaeological Sites and Historic Area
by .
the Comprehensive Plan. Any excavation. to a depth of greater than 18 inches within that area
requires that an archaeological survey be performed; consequently, the applicant will need to
submit the archaeological survey prior to the issuance.of a.building permit.
RECOMMENDATION:
The CRA Board of Commissioners finds. that the proposed project is in conformance with the
requirements of the MUW- 12 zoning district and is in keeping with the goals and objectives of
the Updated RedevelQpment Plan, and recommends City Council approval with the
following .
conditions:
1.This approval is based upon the site plan and documentation. submitted in conjunction
with this application. The site plan, dated 4/22/03; shall b~ used as the basis for issuirig
permits for the development in conjunction with the conditions contained herein.
2. The development shall be subject to the WindbomeDebris Ordinance, as
adopted by the
City Council.. .
3. The individual units shall meet the fire separation
requirements as dictated by code. The
Fire Marshall shall review and approve the location of fire hydrants on the
property prior
to the issuance of a building permit. .
4. A formal landscape plan, inc1udingiIrigation specifications, shall be submitted upon
application for a building permit. Any undeveloped portions of the building site shall be
graded and seeded until such time as a building permit is issued for ~e" e1opment on that
portion of the site. The landscape plan shall show the phasing plan for the landscaping.
5. The comments of the Building Official dated 4/ 29/2003 are hereby incorporated as
conditions of approval, ( see attached memo from Linda Carnley). .
