READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Okaloosa County BOCC — September 3, 2013 — Cell Phone Waiting Area Feasibility and Alternatives Analysis — reading text
Part 3 of 3. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — 164-Cell Phone Waiting Area Feasibility and Alternatives Analysis.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
system and Sprint communication
infrastructure are depicted in Photos 11 and 12 respectively. Based on the field location of
the above-ground potions of these existing utilities, it appears that the irrigation control
system may remain in place. However, the underground irrigation lines may be located
under the proposed pavement and may need to be relocated around the waiting area. It
appears that the other utilities identified in Exhibit 5 may remain in place. A detailed survey
is recommended to determine the exact location of the existing underground utilities should
this alternative is ultimately chosen for development.
The FIDS message board is located just north of the new parking spaces to provide the best
visibility to the CWA users and avoid the existing underground utilities. The communication
improvements would run from the existing fiber optic infrastructure just west of the main
parking lot toll booth to the FIDS location, at an estimated length of 500 If.
The proposed new impervious area associated with this alternative is approximately 7,300 sf
so a stormwater permit would typically be required prior to construction. Florida Department
of Environmental Protection permit number 46-0160002-001-RG was processed in August
1999 that permitted the pond (identified as the “East Pond”) located just east of the
proposed development location. Based on the permit documentation, the East Pond was
constructed with an additional 0.86 ac-ft of storage volume remaining. The proposed
improvements would only contribute approximately 0.007 ac-ft of runoff to this pond so the
~
wt
GRAPHIC SCALE iM FEET
wear
ALT-4A
ALT - 4B
NOTE:
EXISTING CONDTIONS HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED.
( OKALOOSA COUNTY
AIRPORTS
AVCON
AVCON, INC.
ENCES 4 FLUORES,
1s earn GE sate A EVEL ES
"Sree amy osate. van wan eset
Somronat Senta op actuation mame tt
ae
NORTHWEST FLORIDA
REGIONAL AIRPORT
CELL PHONE WAITING
AREA FEASIBILITY AND
ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
ALTERNATE NO. 4:
EAST LOOP ROAD
(16-21 SPACES)
[i toresan oettan comme arco oar
oataacton sirecoucton os oh on of ten Cou
SSTotm rat a ere
REVISIONS:
NOT ote | sy |cescRonon
= din
SCALE: 1" = 40°
DESIGNED BY: irc.
DRAWN BY: JAW.
CHECKED BY: arc.
APPROVED BY: V.CL
OATE: SEPTEMBER 2013
AVCON PROJECT NO. 2013.050.05
EXHIBIT 5
Cell Phone Waiting Area Feasibility and Alternatives Analysis
September 2013
existing permit and associated pond are presumed to be adequate for this alternative
development. Therefore, based on this information, no new stormwater permitting is
anticipated. The stormwater infrastructure improvements are anticipated to include a
standard inlet collection and pipe conveyance system to convey the stormwater runoff to the
pond located just east of the alternative.
Photo 11: Existing irrigation control Photo 12: Existing Sprint
system communication infrastructure
The infrastructure improvements for Alternative No. 4A generally include:
Remove existing landscaping to include palm trees and bushes,
Relocate existing irrigation lines and other utilities as needed,
Grading and sodding,
Remove existing parking lot light
Install three new parking lot lights
Install approximately 850 sy of new asphalt pavement,
Install wheel stops
Install 3-ft wide by concrete island,
Place new pavement markings and vehicular signage
Stormwater conveyance improvements,
Install FIDS message board and communication and power infrastructure, and
Install of communication and WiFi access point infrastructure
CAST TaANMGOODDS
Cell Phone Waiting Area Feasibility and Alternatives Analysis
September 2013
A preliminary project budget for Alternative No. 4A is provided below in Table 4. The
Professional Design and Bidding Services task includes a design survey due to the
impervious improvements and existing utilities in the area. A design survey would also be
required upon completion of the project to meet FDEP requirements.
Table 4: Preliminary Project Budget for Alternative No. 4A
constr. Description Quantity Unit Price Total
A Removal of landscaping lump sum $6,000 $6,000
B Relocation of irrigation lines lump sum $4,000 $4,000
Cc Grading and sodding lump sum $5,000 $5,000
D Remove existing parking lot light 1 ea $2,000 $2,000
E Install new parking lot light 3 ea $6,000 $18,000
F Placement of new asphalt pavement 850 sy $40 $34,000
G Wheel stops 16 ea $250 $4,000
H Install 3-ft wide concrete island 55 sy $50 $2,750
I Place pavement markings and signage lump sum $4,000 $4,000
J Stormwater conveyance lump sum $15,000 $15,000
K FIDS message board and improvements lump sum $35,000 $35,000
K FIDS mounting structure lump sum $10,000 $10,000
K Communication and power to FIDS board 500 If $15 $7,500
L WiFi access point infrastructure lump sum $3,000 $3,000
Professional Design and Bidding Services lump sum $35,000 $35,000
Preliminary Budget: $185,250
Alternative No. 4B is similar to 4A; however, Alternative No. 4B provides 90-degree parking
in lieu of the proposed 45-degree parking in Alternative No. 4A. The Alternative No. 4B
layout is depicted in Exhibit 5. The proposed 90-degree parking layout provides 21 total
parking spaces which is 5 additional parking spaces compared to Alternate No. 4A. The
Okaloosa County Land Development Code requires a 24-ft wide access aisle adjacent to
90-degree parking spaces, as depicted in the exhibit. This alternative requires the
placement of approximately 1,050 sy of new asphalt pavement which is approximately 200
sy more than Alternative No. 4A.
This larger development area may also impact additional existing utilities. The existing
irrigation panel and controller would be located inside of the pavement limits so it would be
required to be relocated outside of the new parking limits. The FIDS message board
location would be located just east of the new parking spaces and as far from the parking as
practical to provide visibility for the northernmost and southernmost spaces, and also avoid
the existing utilities. The infrastructure improvements are similar to those identified for
Alternate No. 4A and the stormwater runoff from this alternative will be accounted for in the
existing East Pond so no new stormwater permitting is anticipated.
10
Cell Phone Waiting Area Feasibility and Alternatives Analysis
September 2013
A preliminary project budget for Alternative No. 4B is provided in Table 5.
Table 5: Preliminary Project Budget for Alternative No. 4B
vena Description Quantity Unit Price Total
A Removal of palm trees and landscaping lump sum $6,000 $6,000
B Relocation of utilities lump sum $10,000 $10,000
Cc Grading and sodding lump sum $6,000 $6,000
D Remove existing parking lot light 1 ea $2,000 $2,000
E Install new parking lot light 3 ea $6,000 $18,000
F Placement of new asphalt pavement 1050 sy $40 $42,000
G Wheel stops 21 ea $250 $5,250
H Install 3-ft wide concrete island 50 sy $50 $2,500
Place pavement markings and vehicular lump sum $4,500 $3,000
signage
J Stormwater Conveyance lump sum $15,000 $15,000
FIDS message board and
K rarebiars/eaitwere improvements Ha eS $35,000 iene
K FIDS mounting structure lump sum $10,000 $5,000
Communication and power cables to FIDS
K | messageboard P 450 If $15 $6,750
L WiFi access point infrastructure lump sum $3,000 $3,000
Professional Design and Bidding Services lump sum $35,000 $35,000
Approximate Total: | $194,500
3.5 Recommended Development Alternative
The four alternatives detailed above have been evaluated and a matrix has been prepared
to summarize the characteristics of each alternative.
Table 6: Alternative Evaluation Matrix
. Access to , Approx.
Ne iatok Mee a viaaily Terminal shone Cost per Other Comments
, Loop Road Space
Most efficient access to
37 spaces are terminal; however,
1 41 within the Yes $105,150 | $2,565 reduces the number of
readability angle spaces available in the
Credit Card Parking Lot
Ves, Gut the Potential budget
eeslemimnosl increase if existin
2 30 spaces are Yes $175,975 | $5,866 ia, 9
utilities must be cut to
approx. 680 ft ralooate
from the FIDS
Yes, but the Drivers must make a
westernmost cars complete loop on the
= is are approx. 450 ft ties 984,225 $6,016 terminal loop road to
from the FIDS access the terminal
4a | 16 misty wo fal Yes $185,250 | $11,578 | _, Potential budget
spaces increase if existing
Visible to all utilities are located
ae al spaces Yes $194,500 | $9,262 under new pavement
1]
Cell Phone Waiting Area Feasibility and Alternatives Analysis
September 2013
Based on the alternatives analysis and the evaluation matrix, it appears that Alternative No.
1 exceeds the target number of parking spaces, provides the most economical cost from a
cost per parking space analysis, and the second most economical development cost. The
relatively low development cost is in part due to the re-designation of a portion of the
existing Credit Card Parking Lot. This alternative provides a total of 41 parking spaces with
37 of these parking spaces within the FIDS message board readability angle. Alternative
No. 3 appears to provide the lease capital cost; however, this alternative provides less than
half of the target number or parking spaces.
In consideration of the number of parking spaces, efficient access to the terminal loop road,
and the approximate budget, Alternative No. 1 is the recommended development
alternative.
A construction contingency is not included in the preliminary budgets since this analysis is a
comparison of the relative cost of each alternative. At least a 25% contingency is
recommended to budget for each alternative to account for unforeseen design and
construction requirements which may be identified during the design phase.
4. Contact Information
AVCON Inc. was retained by Okaloosa County Airports to prepare this report. For questions or
comments regarding this report, please contact:
Tracy Stage, A.A.E.
Deputy Airports Director
Okaloosa County Airports
1701 State Road 85 N.
Eglin AFB, Florida 32542
(850) 651-7160
END OF REPORT
12
