READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Fort Walton Beach Council minutes — 09-24-1990 Special — reading text
Part 3 of 10. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — fwb-2979-original.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
presentation.
Mr. Rosenbaum said, to clarify the $ 2 million
difference. that $ 1. 3 million came almost as a windfall
when the City sold the property on the cut- off. He said
for three years he has gone through a similar exercise.
last year he did an analysis and when his budget came
out, it was within $ 40, 000 or $ 50. 000 of what was
estimated this time last year. He said Mr. deVaux has a
point if he
saying is overstating expenditures
we are
and accurately stating revenues, which has been done in
the four years he has been fighting the budget. He said
the reserves were built by overstating expenditures; the
Finance Director is within 1% of his estimate of
revenues on the last ten years. and that is close
enough. He thought all Mr. deVaux is saying is we are
overstating the estimated expenditures and accurately
stating the estimated revenues and are showing a deficit
budget; this year is $ 2 million. not $ 700. 000; we start
now with $ 10, 781, 000 in cash and end up with $ 8, 368, 000,
which is roughly a $ 2 million difference; but the City
Manager presented the budget he knew he was
said when he
overstating approximately 4%, the Finance Director said
5%; ifyou use 5%, that gets it down to a deficit of
only $ 1, 326, 000; and even with the increased taxes and
the increased fees on
garbage collection, we are showing
we will come in about $ 1. 3 million short.
The Finance comparing the actual cash
Director said
versus accrued
accounting is comparing apples to
oranges; for example. the $ 700, 000 loaned to RDA is
money gone but it will not show up as expenditures.
Mr. Maney complimented Mr. deVaux on his report, it was
very revealing and he was glad it was done. He then
said, referring back to the very first meeting on the
budget, Mr. Wyatt said he thought Council should address
the budget this year on the basis of determining what is
needed, the services needed and then the money to
provide those services. He said he likes that idea very
much, trouble is they have not done it.
5
9- 24- 90
90/ 91 BUDGET ( CONT.) Mr. Maney said for some 25 years he was involved with
putting together and analyzing the work in the bud~ ts;
the last ten years he was running a budget of some $ 75
million dollars a year; every year when they put
together a budget it was subject to first, the proposals
by the various department heads and the chiefs. then it
reviews were made, and rationale
I
was analyzed, was
generated for the money wanted and the work to be done.
He said last year, his first summer on Council, he was
expecting something like that when the budget first came
up and it wasn' tpresented that way, they just said here
are the numbers, and he was new so he did not say much
other than to suggest Manager
to the City that maybe
this year they could budget early, like in
start on the
March or April, to show some trend analysis that would
give some rationale for what was coming in the next four
or five months. He said their budget exercise is marked
by superficial and incomplete information. with no
supporting rationale at all. He said last Friday he saw
for the first time the true budget of the City published
in the paper, and it noted we have a $ 30 million
budget. He said the only thing they have looked at, and
that very superficially, is the General Fund budget
which is around $ 19 million. He
they said he thinks if
are representing the citizens,
they at all should look
parts of the budget, the General Fund and the Enterprise
Funds; he was waiting for that to happen and it hasn' t
happened. He said the budget in the paper also says the
beginning cash reserves on hand this year are $ 10. 8
million and the ending $ 8. 4 million, so that means even
with a 12% increase in taxes, they are forecasting a
loss of $ 2. 4 million, taking $ 1. 3 million out of the
General Fund, and nine- tenths out of the Enterprise
Fund. He said that amounts to living on our savings,
and that should not be done,
you use your reserves for
contingencies, for example. the sewer spray field clean
up, the water supply crisis last year. hurricanes, not
for ordinary every day operations. This tells him
Council has not done job; its the staff will prepare and
present to Council what
they ask staff to do, and they
have done just that; they presented to Council some
General Fund data, they did not do anything about the
Enterprise Fund. no analysis of infrastructure needs and
what money is required to fix or improve it, nothing
about equipment needs or personnel needs, no trend data.
I no
they
town
Wyatt
rationale;
several
should
and
miles
cannot
proposed
because
have;
of
the
and
new
find
right thing
Council
to
streets
it
make
in the
did not
matters
and new
budget.
to do
ask
worse,
sidewalks
