March 26, 2015

Okaloosa County BOCC — March 26, 2015 — III.h. Forbes Article - Tourism Impact

III.h. Forbes Article - Tourism Impact in the March 26, 2015 Okaloosa County BOCC meeting materials. Preserved county-portal original with machine-extracted reading text.

FILED WITH

About this source

Preserved among the March 26, 2015 Okaloosa County Board of County Commissioners meeting materials (IQM2 meeting 1271). The date shown is the verified meeting context, not an independently established creation date for every attachment. The download catalog used Feb 26, 2015; the meeting date was corrected using the agenda/minutes heading and matching source filename.

Original publication
III.h. Forbes Article - Tourism Impact
Date
March 26, 2015
Publisher
Okaloosa County Board of County Commissioners
Where to find it
3
Reference collection
Okaloosa County Board of County Commissioners (IQM2 public portal)

Source date and document identity checked for this intake. Machine text has not received independent human proofreading.

HOW FAR THIS HAS BEEN CHECKED

File / copy authenticity
Preserved files carry a SHA-256 fingerprint fixed at ingest; whether those bytes match the original capture is not independently verified.
Transcription / extraction
Each reading-text file shows its recorded review status below.
Claim corroboration
Not independently verified
View reference catalogue / source ↗

Download this source

III.h. Forbes Article - Tourism Impact — extracted reading text

Machine extraction of the preserved PDF embedded text using pdftotext -layout. Form-feed page boundaries retained; no words rewritten. Not independently human proofread; consult the original for layout and uncertain characters.

Text · 3.4 KB · 3

Download ↓

III.h. Forbes Article - Tourism Impact — preserved PDF

Unchanged downloaded original; SHA-256 checked against the capture inventory.

PDF · 185.2 KB · 3

Download ↓

Reading text

Compare reading text with the preserved source. Line breaks and spacing are retained; long lines wrap to fit the screen. A file's role does not establish that its text has been checked.

III.h. Forbes Article - Tourism Impact — extracted reading text

Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Known limitations

Andrew Levine Contributor I write about marketing places. CMO NETWORK 3/19/2015 @ 12:29PM 134 views Why Tourism Advertising is More Powerful Than You Think I’ve known Bill Siegel for a long time. He and his firm Longwoods International have been tracking the performance of the advertising campaigns of countries, states and cities for over 25 years. So when he called me up and said, “Can we get together? I’ve got some really interesting numbers to share with you,” I readily agreed. Bill had a simple question he wanted to answer: Is there a halo effect generated by tourism advertising? Yes, we can survey consumers and directly see how a state or city’s advertising campaign works in influencing perceptions of a destination’s tourism product and ultimately in motivating travel. But are there other benefits in boosting the community’s overall image with the same audience? North Dakota is a case in point. For the past decade, the state’s “Legendary” campaign has been a successful branding statement connecting the state to potential travelers in an emotional and authentic manner. The most recent ROI research shows that North Dakota’s U.S. campaign generated over $100 in visitor spending for every dollar spent on advertising. North Dakota’s “Legendary” advertising campaign kicked-off in 2005. But here’s where it gets even more interesting. Are the same viewers more positive to North Dakota as: • A place to live? Yes, up 41%. • A place to start a career? Yes, up 100%. • A place to start a business? Yes, up 75%. • A place to attend college? Yes, up 87%. • A place to purchase a second home? Yes, up 113% • A place to retire? Yes, up 75%. Tourism advertising helped boost the state’s image in unexpected ways. Longwoods asked the same six questions in assessing the impact of advertising campaigns for a number of other states, including North Carolina, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, and Wisconsin. The findings couldn’t have been more consistent. In each and every case, effective tourism advertising had the same impact, improving consumer perceptions of each state in accidental yet positive ways. And while tourism marketing has been shown to generate significant economic impact by driving visitation, these results demonstrate the potential long-term benefits for broader economic development. Edward Thorndike, an early educational psychologist, first coined the term “the halo effect” in a 1920 article titled “A Constant Error in Psychological Ratings.” Thorndike asked two commanding officers to evaluate their soldiers in terms of physical qualities (neatness, voice, physique, bearing, and energy) and personal qualities (including dependability, loyalty, responsibility, selflessness, and cooperation). He found that if an officer liked one aspect of the soldier, he tended to have a positive predisposition toward everything about him. Nearly one hundred years later, the same can now be said of tourism advertising. We’ve known for a long time that effective tourism advertising campaigns build positive feelings toward a travel experience and inspire travel. But thanks to Bill Siegel and the Longwoods team, we now know that the same campaigns have other benefits that elevate impressions of a destination in an unintended yet positive manner.

Download this text file with its original spacing ↓

Citation & reuse

Okaloosa County Board of County Commissioners. “Okaloosa County BOCC — March 26, 2015 — III.h. Forbes Article - Tourism Impact.” March 26, 2015. III.h. Forbes Article - Tourism Impact. Crypt of Echoes evidence ID LED-2026-f365a34be7c340d1a97ccc0dabc45db1. http://127.0.0.1:58097/evidence/LED-2026-f365a34be7c340d1a97ccc0dabc45db1. Accessed [date].

Catalogue citation: Okaloosa County Board of County Commissioners, III.h. Forbes Article - Tourism Impact, meeting materials for March 26, 2015. https://okaloosacountyfl.iqm2.com/Citizens/FileOpen.aspx?Type=4&ID=7842&MeetingID=1271

Preserved county public-record source. Third-party attachments may retain their original rights.

Technical archive record ↓