READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Fort Walton Beach Council minutes — 10-12-1999 Joint — reading text
Part 5 of 7. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — fwb-3375-original.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
present that the county wants
to be in control. The county has never taken that position. This
is a joint effort and the county is willing to work with the cities
on all three options.
Mr. Carnathan said he understands the county has taken some steps
and that the cities are not ready to make all the decisions on our
side. The cities are asking the county for help and not to box
them in. He wants to maintain the sovereignty of the City of Fort
Walton Beach and these are decisions that will have to be made by
the city Council. Mr. Carnathan expressed the opinion a small
working group outside the RUA could develop the project jointly.
He said they are not trying to be obstinate as he knows the county
is trying to be helpful. This endeavor is very complicated as
there are three sovereign entities with different needs. He again
suggested creating a working group outside the RUA.
Mr. Littrell said we have to be under construction by the year
2000. However, there is indication the deadline will be extended
by one year.
J
Mr. Nicholson expressed concerns about all the residents. It boils
down to the cost of paying for the pipeline.
Mr. Holley said staff needs direction from the Board regarding
doing some rate work at this time. without doing some additional
rate work, the county will be unable to provide bulk rate costs to
October 12, 1999 - 9- Minute Book 43, Page284
Board of County Commissioners Meeting
thecities which is what they want. The only rate they have is a
commercial rate.
Mr. Dunn suggested starting with a work group.
Mrs. Riggs said she is getting mixed messages. She said Mr. Crews
says he does not feel part of this.
a Ms. Baggett wants to wait
and see the model. Mrs. Riggs said she does not mind meeting once
a month.
Mr. Carnathan said he does not feel the county can wait. Mrs.
Riggs said that the county is just like the cities. They are
having to make a stab in the dark and make a decision.
Mr. Sansom said no matter what the
solution is, some questions need
to be answered. Is it the cities
position they will not buy water
from the county but want to have some ownership in the system? As
Mr. Carnathan said earlier, they currently provide water for the
cities and are reluctant to give that up. The cities may want to
buy water wholesale from the county. The cities may want a
separate pipeline or bigger pipeline at some future date. If the
county makes an investment to provide a larger than 24- inch
pipeline, the county would not want the cities at that time to
decide they want to provide their own water. Mr. Sansom said he is
of the opinion the cities know the answers to some of these
questions already.
Mr. Kelly said the city could have ownership in the 24- inch
pipeline.
Mr. Littrell
said the capacity for furnishing 650, 000 gallons of
water per day to Mary Esther and 1. 9 million gallons pre day to
Fort Walton Beach is built into the 24- inch pipeline. That extra
capacity is included in the interlocal agreement. The cities do
not want to make an investment at this time; however, the agreement
has provisions that in the future
so if the cities desire to
purchase additional water, the county will sell it to them. The
cities have made some counter- proposals. Mr. Littrell stressed
the current proposal has some excess capacity that can be provided
to the two cities. When the pipeline is built, we will have the
capacity but not the water source.
The discussions continued.
Mr. Carnathan advised this issue changes constantly as technology
changes. Anything the county works out with the City of Mary
Esther has nothing to do with taking care of Fort Walton Beach,
Destin or other entities in the future.
October 12, 1999 - 10- Minute Book 43, Page 285
Board of County Commissioners Meeting
Mr. Silverbaord said the central group has more people that don' t
care about this issue. There needs to be a meeting between the
three parties.
Mr. Tucker wanted to know if everyone can agree on the county being
the " sole supplier."
I Mr. Sansom said the cities need to consider what will happen if the
county builds a 24- inch pipeline with the cities of Fort Walton
Beach and Mary Esther having some authority, and then Destin wants
in. If this is a regional system, it will affect Fort Walton Beach
and Mary Esther 50 years from now when we try to sell water to
neighbors. If the cities' position is they want the county to be
the provider, the cities will be out of the picture.
sole If the
cities have
ownership, they will also have authority and
responsibility. The percentage of water needs for the future will
change. At some future date Mary Esther may be the area that is
exploding.
Mr. Lulue said he appreciates the Board' s attitude. If they had
information regarding the model saying the City of Mary Esther' s
water supply will be reduced by 20%, they could make a decision.
He wanted to know if there is any way decisions can be postponed
until we have the model.
Mr. Sansom said no matter what the state says and no matter what
the future capacity is, the question the cities want to answer is
whether or not they want to purchase water or if they want
ownership of the system.
Mr. Kelly wanted to know if this is an option for the cities to
consider.
Mr. Nicholson said his concerns are to provide water for the
citizens and he had thought the~ cities would not want to
participate.
Mr. Carnathan wanted to know Mr. Nicholson' s position regarding
participation by the cities. Mr. Nicholson said he is of the
opinion that ownership of the pipeline was the best way for the
cities to go but stepped back after he understood the cities did
not want to participate if they don' t need water.
Mr Dunn wanted to know if the Board is opposed to the cities
participating.
J Mr. Holley said the first proposal included the cities buying a
share in the pipeline. Having a pipeline and having the cities
owning capacity in the pipeline doesn' t put any water in it.
October 12, 1999 - 11- Minute Book 43i Page 286
Board of County commissioners Meeting
Mr. Carnathan said each issue
is contingent upon something else.
He said it is
important to know who is putting water in what
pipeline. He wanted to know if the county is interested in helping
the cities in accomplishing the long- term water supply needs for
the south end of the county.
Mr. Nicholson said he is interested in providing water for the
citizens and he had thought the cities had stepped back from
wanting ownership in the system. If the cities want to be part of
the system 20 years from now, they will need to be a participant.
He was somewhat surprised when he learned the cities did not want
to have part ownership. However, he does understand the cities not
wanting to spent money if they never need the water. If you spend
the money and never need the water, you have made a bad decision.
It is a difficult decision, but it is a process he thought the
cities had discussed.
Mr. Dunn said he does not think consumption or population will
decrease.
4
Mr. Sansom advised
if the cities are participants,
that there
should be a stipulation in the agreement that water capacity will
always be reserved for the member cities.
Mr. Nicholson said Destin said they didn' t want to participate and
even put that in writing. Now they say they might be interested.
Mr. Carnathan agreed that some decisions need to be made.
Mr. Holley said staff thought they were providing the best option
to cities by the county' s willingness
the to build the system
without an investment from the cities.
Mr. Lulue said that is good option.
a He said he understands the
pipeline can go from 24 inches to 30 inches. He wanted to know if
a 27- inch pipeline would be feasible. Mr. Littrell said 24- and
30- inch pipelines are standard sizes.
Mr. Tucker said he will vote for part ownership although it will
cost the city up front.
Mr. Crews said he would like to have ownership on those
part
corridor wells. He asked why thepeople t
buy the pipe and be
can'
owners of the water. He has a problem with the county getting the
permit for the water in the corridors.
Mr. Carnathan said the issues can' t be solved as we don' t know
where the water is corning from. He suggested there is a need to
meet again and return to the table with some specifics after each
of the entities has had an opportunity to meet individually.
October 12, 1999 - 12- Minute Book 43, Page287
Board of County Commissioners Meeting
Mr. Dunn said he needs a copy of the minutes from today' s meeting.
Following a brief discussion, it was determined the next workshop
to discuss water and sewer issues will be held at 9: 00 a. m. on
November 2, 1999 at Fort Walton Beach City Hall.
RECESS: The
