READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Fort Walton Beach Council minutes — 08-28-1984 Regular — reading text
Part 5 of 6. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — fwb-2767-original.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
COMPANY X) IS MAKING APPLICATION TO PURCHASE
17. 8 ACRES OF PROPERTY INITIALLY WITH OPTIONS FOR 10
ADDITIONAL ACRES AND OPTION FOR AN ADDITIONAL 12. 75 ACRES,
AND WHEREAS, SAID COMPANY WILL EMPLOY NOT LESS THAN 350
INDIVIDUALS IN THE INITIAL STAGES OF THE COMPANY WITH AN
EXPECTED EMPLOYMENT OF 500 OVER A FIVE YEAR PERIOD, AND
WHEREAS, SAID COMPANY IS EXPECTED TO BEGIN CONSTRUCTION AS
SOON AS POSSIBLE, AND WHEREAS, THE COMPANY IS HEREBY ALSO
REQUESTING APPROVAL BY THE CITY, CONSISTENT WITH STATE AND
FEDERAL LAWS, APPROVAL OF INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BONDS IN AN
AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $ 3. 5 MILLION TO COVER COSTS OF BUILDINGS,
GROUNDS, PROPERTY, AND EQUIPMENT, AND WHEREAS, THE PROJECT
HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY THE COMMITTEE OF 100 OKALOOSA COUNTY
AND APPEARS TO MEET ALL REQUIREMENTS, NOW, THEREFORE
BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY OF FORT WALTON BEACH DOES
HEREBY APPROVE THE PROJECT DESCRIBED SUBJECT TO FINAL
APPROVAL AND SUBJECT TO THE COMPANY' S MEETING ALL LOCAL,
STATE AND FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS. THIS RESOLUTION SHALL TAKE
EFFECT IMMEDIATELY UPON APPROVAL BY COUNCIL AND SIGNATURE
BY THE MAYOR.
City Attorney read the resolution.
Mrs. Battle moved the adoption of Resolution 84- 41; seconded
by Mr. Smith.
Mrs. Thornber stated that upon exerc1s1ng option # 1, and
having a total of 27. 8 acres, 500 employees will not meet
Park criteria.
Mr. Miller agreed, and moved that the resolution be amended
to read " with an expected employment of more than 540".
Mr. Patrick seconded the motion to amend and it carried
unanimously.
Mr. George Van Dyke asked why the citizens were not being
told who Company " X" is. Mr. Patrick answered that in
situations like this, if the name the company were revealed,
of
we would find ourselves in a competitive situation with other
cities and counties trying to attract this same company to
their area. Mayor stated that the company had been thoroughly
investigated by the Chamber of Commerce. Mrs. Battle noted
that most of the members of Council knew who Company " X"
was. Mr. Miller said that disclosure will come during the
bid process.
8/ 28/ 84
129
RES. 84- 41 Mayor Bagley asked if there was anyone else who wished
BONDS FOR SCOTT to speak regarding this resolution, and there was not.
STEEL, FOR CO. " X"
CONT' D.) Mayor called for a vote on Resolution 84- 41 as amended
and it was unanimously approved.
RES. 84- 42 RESOLUTION NO. 84- 42: A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING POLICY FOR
1 ESTABLISHING
POLICY FOR IND.
REVENUE BONDS
INDUSTRIAL REVENUE DEVELOPMENT BONDS TO BE ISSUED BY THE
CITY OF FORT WALTON BEACH.
City Attorney read the resolution by title only.
Mrs. Thornber moved the adoption of Resolution 84- 42. Motion
was seconded by Mr. Miller, and carried unanimously.
ORD. 100. 335 ORDINANCE NO. 100. 335: AN ORDINANCE REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY
REZONE FROM R- l IN THE CITY OF FORT WALTON BEACH, FLORIDA, FROM R- l TO R- 2,
TO R- 2 - 25 PARK PROVIDING THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF.
CIRCLE
City Attorney read the ordinance by title only.
Mrs. Battle moved the adoption of Ordinance 100. 335 on second
reading. Motion was seconded by Mrs. Thornber and carried
unanimously.
ORD. 100. 336 ORDINANCE NO. 100. 336: AN ORDINANCE VACATING A CERTAIN ALLEY
VACATING A CERTAIN IN THE CITY OF FORT WALTON BEACH, FLORIDA, PROVIDING THE
ALLEY - ASH ST. EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF.
City Attorney read the ordinance by title only.
Mrs. Thornber moved the adoption of Ordinance 100. 336
on second
reading. Motion was seconded by Mr. Rivers and
carried unanimously.
ORD. 768. 4 ORDINANCE NO. 768. 4: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE BUDGET
AMENDING FOR THE CITY OF FORT WALTON BEACH, FLORIDA, FOR THE FISCAL
BUDGET 1983- 84 YEAR OCTOBER 1, 1983 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 1984 MAKING
CERTAIN DESIGNATED APPROPRIATIONS OF FUNDS OF THE CITY,
PRESCRIBING CERTAIN LIMITATIONS OF THE EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS,
AND PROVIDING THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF.
City Attorney read the ordinance by title only.
Mrs. Battle moved the adoption of Ordinance 768. 4 on second
I ORD. 772
REGULATIONS
SIGN
reading.
a vote of
ORDINANCE NO.
Motion
6- 1,
FOR REPEAL OF CHAPTER XXIII
was
with Mrs.
772:
seconded
Thornber
by Mr.
AN ORDINANCE REGULATING
OF THE
Smith and carried
opposing.
SIGNS,
by
PROVIDING
STANDARD BUILDING CODE,
PROVIDING FOR REVISIONS OF GENERAL PROHIBITIONS AND APPLICA-
TIoNs, PROVIDING FOR REVISIONS OF GENERAL REGULATIONS,
PROVIDING FOR REVISIONS OF REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO NON-
CONFORMING SIGNS, PROVIDING FOR REVISIONS OF ENFORCEMENT AND
PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS, PROVIDING FOR REVISIONS OF
REGULATIONS OF TYPES OF SIGNS, DEFINITIONS, REGULATIONS,
RESTRICTIONS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS, PROVIDING FOR REVISIONS
8/ 28/ 84
130
ORD. 772 OF SIGN REGULATIONS FOR THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, PROVIDING
CONT ' D. ) FOR APPLICATION TO THE CITY CODE AND OTHER ORDINANCES, PROVIDING
FOR REPEAL OF CODE SECTIONS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY:
PROVIDING THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF.
City Attorney read the ordinance by title only.
Mr. Miller moved the adoption of Ordinance 772 on first
reading. Motion was seconded by Mrs. Battle and carried
by a vote of 6- 1, with Mr. Franklin opposing.
Mr. George Dyke, citizen stated that he wanted to comment
Van
on the current
sign ordinance and asked if he should do
so at this time. Mayor asked that he wait until the rest
of the business on the agenda was completed.
ORD. 782 AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 782: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 5,
CHAPTER 5 OF CODE BUILDING REGULATIONS, SECTION 5- 2( 2) ( a) AND ADDING ( d)
OF ORDINANCES OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF FORT WALTON BEACH,
FLORIDA, PROVIDING THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF.
City Attorney read the ordinance by title only.
Mr. Smith moved the adoption of Ordinance 782 on first
reading. Motion was seconded by Mr.
