READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Okaloosa County BOCC — August 4, 2014 — PWPresentation-15--REV01 — reading text
Part 2 of 3. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — 04-PWPresentation-15--REV01.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
Division
1 Program
Description 2 Revenue
3 Key Objectives
Provides Services to Public Funded with Develop and Implement
County Transportation
•Construct and maintain Trust Fund •Strategies to construct,
stormwater infrastructure maintain, inspect and
•Fuel Taxes catalogue existing and
•Develop and implement planned stormwater systems
Stormwater Best Management •Intergovernmental revenue within Okaloosa County.
Practices (BMP’s) (federal and state shared)
•Utilize BMP defined in the
•Collection and management •Charges for service, misc. County Notice of Intent
of NATIONAL POLLUTANT revenue and transfers (NPDES Permit)
DISCHARGE ELIMINATION
SYSTEM (NPDES) data. •MSTU •Construct and maintain
stormwater infrastructure
•Development of future •Annual allocation from
funding needs general fund
NPDES Stormwater Permit
(National Pollution Discharge Elimination System)
• The federal Clean Water Act requires that all municipal,
industrial and commercial facilities that discharge wastewater or
stormwater directly from a point source (a discrete conveyance
NPDES such as a pipe, ditch or channel) into a water of the United States
Permit (such as a lake, river, or ocean) must obtain a National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit.
• All permits are written to ensure the receiving waters will achieve
their Water Quality Standards.
Pebble Beach Drive , Shalimar
Meadow Lane, Fort Walton Beach
Shoal River Drive, Crestview
Stormwater Historical Staffing Summary
Category FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15
Full-time 4 4 4 4
Part-Time 0 0 0 0
Relief 0 0 0 0
Total 4 4 4 *4
*4 FTE Infrastructure Section Stormwater
50% Survey Aide II Engineering
50% Cad Designer Engineering
80% General Equipment Operator Road
80% General Equipment Operator Road
50% Light Equipment Operator Road
50% Senior Heavy Equipment Operator Road
50% Stormwater Maintenance Foreman Road
50% Road Constr/Maintenance Foreman Road
50% Road Construction Supervisor Road
Stormwater Budget History & Revenue
Fiscal Year Personnel Operating Capital Revenue
Services Expenses Outlay
FY09 0 5,400 1,990,696 170,974
FY10 469,518 62,642 2,246,826 841,780
FY11 477,409 513,310 902,961 904,399
FY12 437,755 617,317 199,259 701,486
FY13 444,085 292,479 66,346 724,172
FY14 502,106 368,146 256,514 589,975
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
1,200,000
1,000,000
800,000
Operating Expenses
600,000
Capital Outlay
Revenue
400,000
200,000
0
FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15
Note: FY15 Revenue based $450,000 MSTU and General fund split.
Budget Transfer- Revenue
Unincorporated Parks MSTU $450,000
General Fund Contribution
$400,000
Stormwater permitting and
NPDES compliance
Coastal Beach sites tested
receive POOR report for water
quality in Okaloosa County
Proposed Stormwater MSTU Adjustment
Current MSTU Millage rate = .18 mils per dollar
non ad valorem
PROPOSED MILLAGE INCREASE
Option B
Option A .2990 millsBper dollar
Option
.2718 mils per dollar .2990 mils per dollar
$781,207
$602,646 $781,207
Both figures represent the additional revenue we would receive
above the base assessment
Solid Waste & Recycling
Solid Waste & Recycling Division
1 Program
Description 2 Revenue
3 Key Objectives
Provides Services to Public Funded through Provide and Promote
•Collection and disposal of • Landfill Operating Fees •Provide a collection
municipal solid waste to all mechanism for the removal of
•Landfill/Transfer Station Tip
citizens and municipalities of solid waste, manage Franchise
Fees
Okaloosa County agreement
•Franchise disposal fees (per
•Both rural and urban •Conduct Closure monitoring
household) & CPI retention
residential collection in and remediation activities at
accordance with State and •Recycling revenue from all public landfills in
federal guidelines Franchisee accordance with State and
federal regulations
•Household Hazardous Waste •Conditionally exempt Small
(HHW), Special Waste, and Quantity Generators (HHW) •Increase public awareness
Small Quantity Generator and participation
verification •Sale of Metals, Grant
•Research new technologies
Reimbursements and revenue
and systems related to
from other departments
recycling and HHW
Major Accomplishments
ü Operation of two major Transfer Stations servicing both northern
and southern portions of the county
ü Accomplished a Waste and Recycling Composition Study
ü Debris removal from April Storm for FEMA compliance
ü Environmental Restoration Efforts
• Long Term Care permits, dedicated well recovery pipelines,
implemented requirements for Monitored Natural attenuation at
Niceville LF, quarterly O&M at Baker LF
Major Accomplishments
ü Purchased new in-line grinder in lieu of contract grinding to
enhance County’s yard trash operation
ü Collected and processed over 1 million pounds of Household
Hazardous Waste (HHW)
ü Conducted (HHW) Cooperative mobile waste collection in nine (9)
neighboring counties and Hurlburt Field
ü Expanded in-house recycling utilizing the services of HORIZON’s
ü Public Education: Earth Day/Arbor Day, Independence Day at the
Landing, Southeast Recycling and Trade Show in Sandestin
•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Environmental Restoration Budget
$800,000
$700,000
$600,000
$500,000
Landfill Closure
$400,000 WLF Rem.
BLF Rem
$300,000 NLF Rem.
$200,000
$100,000
$-
FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14
qOverall Environmental Restoration costs have stabilized since FY08
qEnvironmental liability at county landfills is decreasing
qRemediation Modifications for BLF and NLF addressed in 2013 reduced Environmental Remediation costs at both landfills
qRemediation Modifications at WLF may be completed by FY14 which will result in a decrease in remediation costs
qRestoration activities have a clear path to closure
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
SW Reserves
$1,800,000
$1,680,000
$1,300,000
$800,000
$787,000
$300,000 $144,000
$0 $0
($200,000) FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13
qReserves continually declined into FY11
qFY10-FY11 Negotiations with WM
qFY11/FY12 New contract pricing results in increasing Reserves
•Floor Rates for Recyclables
•Reduced Disposal Rates
•Reduction in Collection Rates
•Multi-Family Rate Added
qFY14 SW will be able to replace 15 year old grinder, 18 year old rolloff, and 20yd3 dump tuck
qFY 15 SW & RE will be able to replace Service Truck w/>150,000 miles, Pickup w/>175,000
miles; 20 year old loader, 16 year old farm tractor, and replace pan sold in 2013 with 20 CY
articulated dump for work at Niceville Landfill as well as at Wright LF (work cannot be performed
without this equipment.)
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
$250,000 Labor Costs Supplies/Disposal Costs
$200,000
$150,000
$100,000
$50,000
$0
Current Supplies/Disposal Proposed
Supplies/Disposal
Current Labor Proposed Labor
•Current labor based on •Proposed labor based on
overtime labor and two employees operating at
contracted services for a regular time
chemist
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
HHW OPERATIONS ANALYSIS
•Revenues derived from sale of oil & gas from small businesses which pay for
disposal and processing.
•Develop a FEE SCHEDULE or limit disposal
Current Costs Proposed Costs
$300,000
Using OT Labor
$200,000 and contracted
