READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE

Okaloosa County BOCC — August 4, 2014 — PWPresentation-15--REV01 — reading text

Part 2 of 3. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.

Machine-extracted text — 04-PWPresentation-15--REV01.pdf

Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed

Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.

Division 1 Program Description 2 Revenue 3 Key Objectives Provides Services to Public Funded with Develop and Implement County Transportation •Construct and maintain Trust Fund •Strategies to construct, stormwater infrastructure maintain, inspect and •Fuel Taxes catalogue existing and •Develop and implement planned stormwater systems Stormwater Best Management •Intergovernmental revenue within Okaloosa County. Practices (BMP’s) (federal and state shared) •Utilize BMP defined in the •Collection and management •Charges for service, misc. County Notice of Intent of NATIONAL POLLUTANT revenue and transfers (NPDES Permit) DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) data. •MSTU •Construct and maintain stormwater infrastructure •Development of future •Annual allocation from funding needs general fund NPDES Stormwater Permit (National Pollution Discharge Elimination System) • The federal Clean Water Act requires that all municipal, industrial and commercial facilities that discharge wastewater or stormwater directly from a point source (a discrete conveyance NPDES such as a pipe, ditch or channel) into a water of the United States Permit (such as a lake, river, or ocean) must obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. • All permits are written to ensure the receiving waters will achieve their Water Quality Standards. Pebble Beach Drive , Shalimar Meadow Lane, Fort Walton Beach Shoal River Drive, Crestview Stormwater Historical Staffing Summary Category FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 Full-time 4 4 4 4 Part-Time 0 0 0 0 Relief 0 0 0 0 Total 4 4 4 *4 *4 FTE Infrastructure Section Stormwater 50% Survey Aide II Engineering 50% Cad Designer Engineering 80% General Equipment Operator Road 80% General Equipment Operator Road 50% Light Equipment Operator Road 50% Senior Heavy Equipment Operator Road 50% Stormwater Maintenance Foreman Road 50% Road Constr/Maintenance Foreman Road 50% Road Construction Supervisor Road Stormwater Budget History & Revenue Fiscal Year Personnel Operating Capital Revenue Services Expenses Outlay FY09 0 5,400 1,990,696 170,974 FY10 469,518 62,642 2,246,826 841,780 FY11 477,409 513,310 902,961 904,399 FY12 437,755 617,317 199,259 701,486 FY13 444,085 292,479 66,346 724,172 FY14 502,106 368,146 256,514 589,975 •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 1,200,000 1,000,000 800,000 Operating Expenses 600,000 Capital Outlay Revenue 400,000 200,000 0 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 Note: FY15 Revenue based $450,000 MSTU and General fund split. Budget Transfer- Revenue Unincorporated Parks MSTU $450,000 General Fund Contribution $400,000 Stormwater permitting and NPDES compliance Coastal Beach sites tested receive POOR report for water quality in Okaloosa County Proposed Stormwater MSTU Adjustment Current MSTU Millage rate = .18 mils per dollar non ad valorem PROPOSED MILLAGE INCREASE Option B Option A .2990 millsBper dollar Option .2718 mils per dollar .2990 mils per dollar $781,207 $602,646 $781,207 Both figures represent the additional revenue we would receive above the base assessment Solid Waste & Recycling Solid Waste & Recycling Division 1 Program Description 2 Revenue 3 Key Objectives Provides Services to Public Funded through Provide and Promote •Collection and disposal of • Landfill Operating Fees •Provide a collection municipal solid waste to all mechanism for the removal of •Landfill/Transfer Station Tip citizens and municipalities of solid waste, manage Franchise Fees Okaloosa County agreement •Franchise disposal fees (per •Both rural and urban •Conduct Closure monitoring household) & CPI retention residential collection in and remediation activities at accordance with State and •Recycling revenue from all public landfills in federal guidelines Franchisee accordance with State and federal regulations •Household Hazardous Waste •Conditionally exempt Small (HHW), Special Waste, and Quantity Generators (HHW) •Increase public awareness Small Quantity Generator and participation verification •Sale of Metals, Grant •Research new technologies Reimbursements and revenue and systems related to from other departments recycling and HHW Major Accomplishments ü Operation of two major Transfer Stations servicing both northern and southern portions of the county ü Accomplished a Waste and Recycling Composition Study ü Debris removal from April Storm for FEMA compliance ü Environmental Restoration Efforts • Long Term Care permits, dedicated well recovery pipelines, implemented requirements for Monitored Natural attenuation at Niceville LF, quarterly O&M at Baker LF Major Accomplishments ü Purchased new in-line grinder in lieu of contract grinding to enhance County’s yard trash operation ü Collected and processed over 1 million pounds of Household Hazardous Waste (HHW) ü Conducted (HHW) Cooperative mobile waste collection in nine (9) neighboring counties and Hurlburt Field ü Expanded in-house recycling utilizing the services of HORIZON’s ü Public Education: Earth Day/Arbor Day, Independence Day at the Landing, Southeast Recycling and Trade Show in Sandestin •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Environmental Restoration Budget $800,000 $700,000 $600,000 $500,000 Landfill Closure $400,000 WLF Rem. BLF Rem $300,000 NLF Rem. $200,000 $100,000 $- FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 qOverall Environmental Restoration costs have stabilized since FY08 qEnvironmental liability at county landfills is decreasing qRemediation Modifications for BLF and NLF addressed in 2013 reduced Environmental Remediation costs at both landfills qRemediation Modifications at WLF may be completed by FY14 which will result in a decrease in remediation costs qRestoration activities have a clear path to closure •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• SW Reserves $1,800,000 $1,680,000 $1,300,000 $800,000 $787,000 $300,000 $144,000 $0 $0 ($200,000) FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 qReserves continually declined into FY11 qFY10-FY11 Negotiations with WM qFY11/FY12 New contract pricing results in increasing Reserves •Floor Rates for Recyclables •Reduced Disposal Rates •Reduction in Collection Rates •Multi-Family Rate Added qFY14 SW will be able to replace 15 year old grinder, 18 year old rolloff, and 20yd3 dump tuck qFY 15 SW & RE will be able to replace Service Truck w/>150,000 miles, Pickup w/>175,000 miles; 20 year old loader, 16 year old farm tractor, and replace pan sold in 2013 with 20 CY articulated dump for work at Niceville Landfill as well as at Wright LF (work cannot be performed without this equipment.) •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• $250,000 Labor Costs Supplies/Disposal Costs $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 $0 Current Supplies/Disposal Proposed Supplies/Disposal Current Labor Proposed Labor •Current labor based on •Proposed labor based on overtime labor and two employees operating at contracted services for a regular time chemist •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• HHW OPERATIONS ANALYSIS •Revenues derived from sale of oil & gas from small businesses which pay for disposal and processing. •Develop a FEE SCHEDULE or limit disposal Current Costs Proposed Costs $300,000 Using OT Labor $200,000 and contracted

Download this text file with its original spacing ↓