READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Fort Walton Beach Council minutes — 07-14-1981 Regular — reading text
Part 15 of 16. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — fwb-2687-original.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
motion on the floor.
Mr. said, Madame Mayor, at this point I
Franklin
have forgotten which motion that was; however, I
believe that Mr. Miller is referring to the motion
7/ 14/ 81 261
to terminate Mr. Walker' s employment.
Mr. Franklin withdrew motion at this time.
Mr. Franklin moved that Resolution 81- 23 termina-
ting Mr. Walker' s employment be adopted.
Motion was seconded by ( inaudible).
1 Mayor asked for
Mr.
Mr.
Baughman:
Grant: Yes
a
Yes
vote from each Council member.
Mrs. Thornber: Yes.
Mr. Bishop: No.
Mr. Sundy: No.
Mr. Miller: No.
Mr. Franklin: Yes.
Mayor said, motion carried.
HERITAGE CASKET Under old business, Mayor presented a memo regarding
COMPANY the Heritage Casket Company as follows:
On May 20, 1981, Henry OWens, City Fire Inspector,
conducted an inspection of Heritage Casket Company
located at 117 Windham Avenue, SE, which was in
operation at that time in a C- 2 zone with no inspection
and no occupational license.
On June 9,
1981, the City Manager presented the problem
to the Council, which referred the issue to a
City
committee for study. The committee consists of Mr.
Grant, Chairman, and Mr. Bishop and Mr. Baughman,
members.
On June 17, 1981, the City Manager directed the Build-
ing Inspector, Fire Inspector, and Sanitation Inspector
to reinspect the Herit,age Casket Compan.y on a basis
hat it wou~ d be used for packing and shipping only.
I On July 8, 1981, a follow- up inspection of the Heri-
tage Casket Company was conducted by the Building
Inspector and the Fire Inspector.
vealed
The inspection re-
that some items had been taken care of. There
was casket in the room that is being used as a
one
paint booth, and there was evidence that spray painting
was being done. If painting is to be done, the paint
booth should comply with NFPA- 33 spray application re-
quirements.
r--~'
262 7/ 14/ 81
Heritage Casket Company is still in operation
with no occupational license and has not met
all requirements of the codes.
Is/ Gary Campbell, Building Inspector"
The Public Works Director stated he had no re-
commendation at this time.
He further discussed the discrepancies and said
the company was operating without an occupational
license.
Mr. Baughman said neighbors were complaining about
the paint spray in the area and that he was still
receiving these complaints.
It was agreed toleave it up to the Public Works
Director and for him to report back to Council at
the next meeting.
WEST PARK CENTER Under old business, Mayor presented a memo from
SEWER & WATER the Public Works Director on sewer and water taps
SERVICE for West Park Center as follows:
Attached is a memo and cost estimates for sewer
and water service for West Park Center Office Condo-
minium in the Industrial Park. This was inadvert-
ently omitted. I would like this submitted to
Council for their consideration at the next Council
Meeting.
Is/ c. L. Ingram, Public Works Director"
The Public Works Director said he was not in agree-
ment with West Park Center.
Mr. Baughman said, in the past, we have used cost
plus basis on this type project and felt this should
be continued.
Public Works Director said there is a misunderstand-
ing with the people involved.
Mr. Baughman moved that West Park Center be charged
on a cost plus basis for water and sewer taps.
J,:,
Motion was not seconded.
After discussion agreed a motion was not
it was
necessary had been passed unanimously
because one
at City Council meeting held June 9, 1981. It was
also decided this will be handled by the Public
Works Director.
7/ 14/ 81
263
STREET & PARK Under old business, Mayor reported we have not had
NAMING FOR DOCIE a reply from Mrs. Docie Bass concerning the street
BASS re- naming and the name of the park. Also we have
had objections to the street re- naming from the
Nazarene Church, the First Methodist Church, Mrs.
Irma Earley, and First Baptist Church.
Mr. Bishop moved to drop re- naming the street portion
1
of the motion since a number of people have objected.
Motion was seconded by Mr. Baughman. After discussion,
Mr. Baughman moved to amend the motion to consider
naming the next appropriate street that is proper
after Docie Bass. Amendment was seconded by Mr.
Franklin.
Motion as amended was carried unanimously.
Mr. Baughman suggested recessing until 5: 30 p. m.
tomorrow night, after interviews. Motion was seconded
by Mr. Franklin.
Mr. Bishop said he would not be available. He also
resigned as Council' s representative to West Florida
Regional Planning Council and moved to appoint Mrs.
Thornber as the Council' s representative and to
approve their budget request of $ 4, 160. 00. Motion
was seconded. by Mr. Baughman and carried.
Mr. Baughman again requested the meeting be recessed
until 5: 30 p. m. tomorrow night.
Mr. Miller recommended that tabled items be held
until meeting scheduled in two weeks.
Mr. Baughman withdrew his motion.
Mr. Bishop moved to consider Items C, E, & M under
new business and table remaining items until next
Council meeting. Motion was seconded by Mr. Sundy
and carried unanimously.
MR. MILLER' S Under new business, request from Councilman Miller
REQUEST TO RE- for reconsideration of each motion passed by Council
CONSIDER MOTIONS at its Special Meeting on July 6, 1981. He stated
he did not agree with the resolutions at the time.
He moved that Resolution 81- 21 be rescinded due to
the fact that Mr. Smith resigned before the motion
was voted upon. Motion was seconded by Mr. Sundy.
Mr. Miller' sreason for rescinding the resolution is
to correct the record in that the resolution was made
moot because of Smith' s resignation. He stated that
Mr. Smith had been extremely valuable to the City and
he felt Council had acted hastily in firing Mr. Smith.
2G4 7/ 14/ 81
Mr. Franklinsaid, I have some discussion on that,
I challenge this, due to the fact that Mr. Smith,
at the present time, is acting as counsel in a
law suit against the City. How can he assist the
City? Do we have some conflict of interest there?
Mr. Miller said, I don' t think so. I' m talking
about the transition, simply to obtain records,
files, general information that may be useful
to the City
Mr. said, I was under the impression that the
Mead
documents that he left with Council that evening,
according to what I interpreted to be his complete
file. We have made checks on certain instances,
he has assured us that we have all the files per-
taining to certain matters and I have taken those
matters and completed them.
Mr. Miller said, I can' t believe
