READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Fort Walton Beach Council agenda — 01-26-2010 Special-Utility Rate Study — reading text
Part 1 of 10. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — fwb-25142-original.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
AGENDA
CITY OF FORT WALTON BEACH
SPECIAL MEETING
January 26, 2010
5: 00pm
CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
2. ACTION - DISCUSSION
2. 1 Discussion - Presentation of Utility Rate Study findings and
recommendations. Synopsis: The City' s Consultant, Mike Rocca from
Brown & Caldwell, will be making the presentation. No action required.
Finance Director)
ADJOURNMENT
Any person who decides to appeal any decision made with respect to any matter at this meeting will need
a record of the proceedings, and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the
proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be
based. ( Chapter 286.0105 F.S.)
The City of Fort Walton Beach adheres to the American with Disabilities Act and will make reasonable
modifications for access to this meeting upon request. Please call City Clerk Helen Spencer at 850 -833-
9509 to make a request For Hearing Impaired dial the City Hall TDD # 850- 833 -9925 or 1- 800 -955-
8771 ( TDD) or 1- 800 -955 -8770 ( Voice). Requests must be received at least 48 hours in advance of the
meeting in order to allow the City time to provide requested service.
City Council Special Meeting
January 26, 2010
City of Fort Walton Beach .
Rate Study
ate Stud'v - Whv do we need a Wqte Increase now?
Addresses revenue sufficiency
Bond Ordinance requires that the City maintain proper debt service coverage
r
Creditworthiness — the City must maintain adequate creditworthiness in order to
qualify for financing, bond issuance, etc.
Capital needs that must be addressed due to our aging System
The System
Potential failures — ultimately cost more money and could possibly have
environmental effects
0
Pump Station # 1 emergency repairs
0 Pump Station # 1 Force Main —30 years old
0 2- 1/ 4" water main replacement
0 Kepner Drive Project
0 Oregon Drive Project
5 -Year CIP schedule — Necessary for addressing deficiencies in the current
infrastructure
Interlocal Agreement
Increases operating expense by $ 2M - $ 2. 5M annually
The Interlocal was the best alternative
0 High cost of renovating the Plant
0 The lease of the spray fields was unknown
0
The economy and the effect on Bond Issuance
Rate Increase
Designed so that the low -level users will experience less of an impact than the
high -end users, thereby encouraging conservation and providing for just and
equitable rates
Initial increase will occur on April 1, 2010 and October 1, 2010
o Helps to ease the impact of the rate increase on the customers
o Provides additional revenue needed in current FY
o Attached chart shows the impact to a typical utility bill
Comparison to other local Utilities
31 % of residential billings occur within the 2, 000 gallonage rate structure
What happens if we do not implement the rate increase?
Over the course of the next five years, approximately $ 41VI would need to be used
from Net Assets
No capital improvements would be made and the System would continue to
deteriorate
The City would be in violation of its current Bond Ordinances
Table ES 1
Revenue Sufficiency , Existing bates
2009/ 10 2010J11 2011/ 12 2012/ 13 2013/ 14
6, 886,400 4 6, 963,suu 4 6,) z5j, zuu 4 (),` Zil, .)VV
Revenues 5 6, 910)8uu
Expenditures 6, 901, 200 7, 754,400 7, 638,900 82034,800 8,432, 100
Shoftfalls 14,800) 843, 600) 675, 600) 1, 051, 600) 1, 444,800)
Table ES 4
Typical Monthly Rate Increases
Residential 3/ 4" Meter
FY 2009/ 10 FY 2010/ 11
Increase Increase
Gallona ae
, Existing Apr 1, 2010 Amount Percent Oct 1, 2010 Amount Percent
0 24.26 24.63 0.37 1. 53% 24.99 0. 36 1. 46%
2,000 24.26 24.63 0. 37 1. 53% 24.99 0. 36 1. 46%
41. 31 45.02 3. 71 8.98% 48. 69 3. 67 8.15%
5,000
73. 00 82. 93 9. 93 13. 60% 3 92.75 9. 82 11. 84%
10,000
1500 107.75 124.53 16. 78 15. 57% 141. 10 16. 57 13. 31%
Commercial 3/ 4" Meter
0 27.61 28.02 0.41 1. 48% 28.42 0.40 1. 43%
21000 27. 61 28.02 0.41 1. 48% 28.42 0.40 1. 43%
46.97 51. 17 4.20 8. 94% 55.36 4.19 8. 19%
51000
82.51 93. 68 11. 17 13. 54% 104. 82 11. 14 11. 89%
101000
1500 121. 11 139. 88 18. 77 15. 50% 158. 57 18.69 13. 36%
2-
Table ES 5
Monthly Service Bill Comparisons For 2009/ 10
4,000 Gallons of Water and Wastewater
Water Wastewater Total
Fort Walton Beach
10.96 24.42 35. 38
Existing 2009/ 10 ;
Proposed April 1, 2010 11. 74 26.98 38.72
Other Utilities'
Callaway 24.10 44.01 68. 11
Crestview 12.70 26. 50 39. 20
Destin Water Users, Inc. 13. 77 28.95 42.72
21. 55 31. 90 53.45
Mary Esther
Niceville 18.70 24.95 43.65
Okaloosa County 18.21 31. 38 49.59
16. 32 33.01 49.33
Panama City
Panama City Beach 15. 34 16.02 31. 36
Pensacola ( ECUA) 15. 81 20.68 36.49
Pensacola Beach(ECUA) 18. 11 28.60 46.71
Valparaiso 11. 77 17. 07 28.84
Other Utilities Average 16.94 27.55 44.50
1. Rates current as of November 19, 2009.
3-3-
CITY OF
wow,
WATER AND WASTEWATER
MULTI -YEAR RATE STUDY
REPORT
January 2010
prepared by
850 Trafalgar Court, Suite 300
Maitland, Florida 32751
4-
850 Trafalgar Court
Suite 300
Maitland, Florida 32751
Tel: ( 407) 661 -9500
Fax: ( 407) 661 -9599
www.brownandcaldwell. com
January 21, 2010
Ms. Brandy Wunker
Finance Director
City of Fort Walton Beach
107 Miracle Strip Pkwy SW
Fort Walton Beach, FL 32548 138309
Subject: Water and Wastewater Multi -Year Rate Study Report
Dear Ms. Wunker:
Pursuant to out agreement, Brown and Caldwell conducted a water and wastewater
rate study for the City of Fort Walton Beach. This Report provides the analysis,
findings, conclusions and recommendations of the study together with discussions,
tables and schedules to support and document the study process. Professional
care was used in identifying and utilizing data, assumptions and estimates such that
the rate structure and rates reasonably represent the costs of providing services to
customers within the City' s service areas.
Thanks and appreciation is extended to the City of Fort Walton Beach for giving
Brown and Caldwell this opportunity and to you and the City's fine staff that
provided data and assisted in the understanding and development of critical data.
Very truly yours,
BROWN AND CALDWELL
Marco H. Rocca, CMC
Project Manager
C o n s u l t a n t s
E n v i r o n m e n t a-
d E n g i n e e r s&
WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This Report identifies appropriate cost recovery recommendations to achieve revenue sufficiency for
Utilities
water and wastewater services provided by the City of Fort Walton Beach ( the " City ")
Department (the " Utility "). Additionally, the Utility's five year Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
is scheduled to be funded from several sources including contributions, reserve funds, grants and
long term debt that is dependent on amounts derived from operating revenues. The methodology
debt service and
used in the study process provides for just and equitable recovery of expenses,
renewals to operate and maintain water and wastewater services through user rates, fees and charges.
The recommendations herein are consistent with requirements of Florida Statutes, common law
relative to water and wastewater ratemaking, and City policies.
The primary purpose of this rate study is to address revenue sufficiency in light of the dramatic
changes to operations resulting in material cost increases due to: 1) the decommissioning of
wastewater treatment and disposal facilities with future wastewater services provided through an
agreement with Okaloosa County; 2) regulatory requirements; 3) power and chemicals; and 4)
the
slowdown in the local economy responding to national economic conditions.
This study has identified that although significant reductions in expenses were made by staff
wherever feasible, the pending impact of payments to the County for wastewater services, together
with the continued costs of power and chemicals, and need for renewal of facilities results in
material operating shortfalls as illustrated below in Table ES 1.
Table ES 1
Revenue Sufficiency - Existing Rates
2009/ 10 2010/ 11 2011/ 12 2012/ 13 2013/ 14
Revenues $ 6, 886, 400 6, 910, 800 6, 963, 300 6, 983, 200 6, 987,
