READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Fort Walton Beach Council minutes — 07-24-1990 Regular — reading text
Part 2 of 15. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — fwb-2998-original.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
deVaux said he nominated the people in the order he
wanted them to be voted on. but he did not care about
the order of nominations. He said what matters to him
is that he gets a vote for every person instead of
limiting him to vote one time.
Discussion followed on the one vote per ballot, and the
viva voce method. The City Attorney. addressing the
ballot issue, said there is not a violation preventing
Council from using a written ballot; Council would have
to mark and sign the ballot. that would be a permanent
record and would be collected and read each time.
97
7/24/ 90
COUNCIL VACANCY ( CONT.) Mr. Rosenbaum said. without giving an opinion, he
received a very definitive message from the Attorney
General' s office is walking a thin line of the
that
Sunshine Law. The City Attorney said that is a full
disclosure of proposition, it is handed in, signed,
marked and announced; that is an available alternative
to Council.
I Discussion
described
Order.
viva voce
Mr.
by- pass the way
on
continued
method
pages 371 and 372
on the
of Robert' s
Rosenbaum noted his motion is to
of election.
they were nominated, Council can do what
Mr.
viva
deVaux
voce method
Rules
adopt
said he could
as
of
the
they want on that. Mr. Wyatt said there was the
understanding they would be drawn out of a hat. Mr.
Rosenbaum said he never made any such understanding or
agreement on the order of nominations.
Mr. deVaux asked Mr. Rosenbaum if he would amend the
motion to omit the section on nominations. Mr.
Rosenbaum said it is not within his purview to amend
Robert' s Rules.
The City Attorney said it is within the control of this
body to reverse any action that has been taken and to
correct it as Council sees fit, it is within Council' s
purview to control that
question; Robert' s Rules of
Order provides for setting aside the rules by Council' s
mutual agreement.
Mrs. Wyninegar commented Council can adopt the Mayor' s
recommendation and Council will not be violating the
law. City Attorney said the
The Mayor was asked to
tailor procedure,
a which he has done, and Council
either agrees or they don' t agree. Mr. Smith wished to
know, if Council agrees with the Mayor, then it is legal
according to the City Attorney' s interpretation of
Robert' s Rules of Order. The City Attorney responded
yes.
The Mayor called for the vote on the II1Otion. and it
failed by a vote of 4 to 3. with Smith. Wyatt. Wyninegar
and the Mayor opposed. and Rosenbaua. deVaux. and Maney
in favor.
Mr. Rosenbaum said his attorney' s advice has not
I changed.
excuse
Mr.
he
himself
violation and he
Rosenbaum left
is left
because
is not
the
with
he
going
meeting
no
still
alternative
to
at
thinks
be a
7: 17
other
Council
pa~ ty to
p. m.
it.
than
is
to
in
98
7/ 24/ 90
COUNCIL VACANCY ( CONT.) Mrs. Wyninegar aoved that Council adopt the procedure
spelled out in the Mayor I s letter, as follows: As
prescribed by the City Charter ( Section 4B) the
following persons are eligible for election to City
Council to fill the vacancy for Seat 6 as they were the
nominees received at the prior two meetings of City
Council:
John S. Conners
Alan J. Freiberg
Christianne Gibson
James C. Hughes
James ( Jia) Kitchens
Edwin ( Ned)
