READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Okaloosa County BOCC — December 15, 2015 — Code Enforcement Ordinance Rosetta Stone (2) — reading text
Part 9 of 9. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Code Enforcement Ordinance Rosetta Stone (2) — extracted reading text
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Known limitations
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
to the Board of
County Commissioners abatement and the
imposition of nuisance abatement assessments
to facilitate the remediation of violations other
than those meeting the criteria of section
162.04(5), F.S., that have remained un-
remediated for a period of twelve (12) months or
longer from the date of the Code Enforcement
Board’s initial order. The process for the
imposition and execution of nuisance abatement
assessments for violations as described herein
shall be as provided in this Article. The decision
whether to impose a nuisance abatement
assessment shall be at the sole discretion of the
Board of County Commissioners.
11-608 APPEALS OF CODE ENFORCEMENT
11.03.06. - Appeals.
BOARD ORDERS. Existing language relocated to 11-608.
1. An aggrieved party may appeal the final 1. An aggrieved party may appeal the final
administrative order of the Code Enforcement administrative order of the code enforcement
Board to the Circuit Court. Any such appeal shall board to the county court. Any such appeal shall
be filed within thirty (30) days of the execution of be filed within 30 days of the execution of the
the order to be appealed. order to be appealed.
2. Such an appeal shall be limited to appellate review 2. Such an appeal shall be limited to appellate
of the record created before the Code Enforcement review of the record created before the code
Board. enforcement board.
3. The appealing party shall be responsible for the 3. The appealing party shall be responsible for
preparation of a verbatim transcript. the preparation of a verbatim transcript.
11-609 DURATION OF LIENS No lien provided by
this ordinance shall continue for a period longer (See 11.03.05.3)
than twenty (20) years after the certified copy of an Existing language re-formatted and relocated.
order imposing a fine has been recorded unless,
within that time, an action to foreclose on the lien is
commenced in a court of competent jurisdiction.
The continuation of the lien affected by the
commencement of the action shall not be effective
against creditors or subsequent purchase for
valuable consideration without notice, unless a
notice of lis pendens is recorded.
11-610 VIOLATIONS AS MISDEMEANORS. Existing language re-formatted and relocated.
Violations of County ordinances shall be (See 11.03.05.4)
prosecuted in the same manner as misdemeanors
are prosecuted. Such violations shall be
prosecuted in the name of the state in a court
having jurisdiction of misdemeanors by the
prosecuting attorney and upon conviction shall be
punishable by a fine not to exceed five hundred
(500) dollars or by imprisonment in the county jail
not to exceed sixty (60) days or by both such fine
and imprisonment.
Existing language relocated and re-formatted.
11-611 LEGAL COUNSEL. If necessary, the 11.03.07. - Legal counsel. If necessary, the
Board of County Commissioners shall provide legal board of county commissioners shall provide legal
counsel to the Code Enforcement Board. counsel to the code enforcement board.
11-611 DISTRIBUTION OF FINES OR 11.03.11. - Fine or penalty distribution. Fines or
PENALTIES. Fines or penalties collected penalties collected pursuant to this ordinance shall Existing language relocated and re-formatted.
pursuant to this ordinance shall be remitted by the be remitted by the clerk of circuit court to the board
Clerk of Circuit Court to the Board of County of county commissioners, for deposit in the
Commissioners, for deposit in the Code inspection and code enforcement fund and used to
Enforcement Fund and used to support the costs of support the costs of the code enforcement
the code enforcement program. program.
11-613 LIABILITY No officer, employee, or agent 11.03.09 – Liability. No officer, employee, or
of the state or of any of its subdivisions shall be held agent of the state or of any of its subdivisions shall Existing language relocated and re-formatted.
personally liable in tort or named as a party be held personally liable in tort or named as a
defendant in any action for any injury or damage party defendant in any action for any injury or
suffered as a result of any act, event, or omission damage suffered as a result of any act, event, or
of action in the scope of his employment of function, omission of action in the scope of his employment
unless such officer, employee, or agent acted in of function, unless such officer, employee, or
bad faith or with malicious purpose or in a manner agent acted in bad faith or with malicious purpose
exhibiting wanton and willful disregard of human or in a manner exhibiting wanton and willful
rights, safety, or property. However, such officer, disregard of human rights, safety, or property.
employee, or agent shall be considered an adverse However, such officer, employee, or agent shall
witness in a tort action for any injury or damage be considered an adverse witness in a tort action
suffered as a result of an act, event or omission of for any injury or damage suffered as a result of an
action in the scope of his employment or function. act, event or omission of action in the scope of his
The exclusive remedy for injury or damage suffered employment or function. The exclusive remedy for
as a result of an act, event, or omission of an injury or damage suffered as a result of an act,
officer, employee, or agent of the state or any of its event, or omission of an officer, employee, or
subdivisions or constitutional officers shall be by agent of the state or any of its subdivisions or
action against the governmental entity, or head of constitutional officers shall be by action against
such entity in his official capacity, or the the governmental entity, or head of such entity in
constitutional officer of which the officer, employee, his official capacity, or the constitutional officer of
or agent is an employee, unless such act or which the officer, employee, or agent is an
omission was committed in bad faith or with employee, unless such act or omission was
malicious purpose or in a manner exhibiting wanton committed in bad faith or with malicious purpose
and willful disregard of human rights, safety, or or in a manner exhibiting wanton and willful
property. The state or its subdivisions shall not be disregard of human rights, safety, or property. The
liable in tort for the acts or omissions of an officer, state or its subdivisions shall not be liable in tort
employee, or agent committed while acting outside for the acts or omissions of an officer, employee,
the course and scope of his employment or or agent committed while acting outside the
committed in bad faith or with malicious purpose or course and scope of his employment or committed
in a manner exhibiting wanton and willful disregard in bad faith or with malicious purpose or in a
of human rights, safety, or property. manner exhibiting wanton and willful disregard of
human rights, safety, or property.
11-614 RELIEF Respondents shall be entitled to a
hearing in front of the Code Enforcement Board for Existing language (section 11.03.10.3) relocated
the purpose of receiving relief from enforcement in and re-formatted.
cases where a hardship or special conditions exist as
determined by the Board. A fee to be determined to
cover the cost of this action should be charged for
such hearing. No fees shall be assessed if the case
is dismissed.
11.03.08. - Notices. All notices required by this The notice requirements are provided in each
ordinance shall be by certified mail, return receipt individual section and defer to the requirements
requested or, when mail would not be effective, by of Chapter 162 of the Florida Statutes. This was
hand delivery by the code enforcement officer. done to provide the greatest flexibility in delivery
Comparison of Existing and Proposed Code Enforcement Provisions
