READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Fort Walton Beach Council minutes — 05-01-1963 Special — reading text
Part 2 of 2. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — fwb-30835-original.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
51
MR. LEONARD HANAUER PRESENTED A REPORT TO THE : CITY OF FORT WALTON
BEACH ON ~ INANCING, DATED MAY I, 1963, SETTING FORTH THE PROPOSED
PLAN' OF HIS COMPANY. COUNCILMAN TOLBERT ASKED MR. HANAUER IF HE
WERE PREPARED TO MAKE THE CITY AN OFFER. MA. HANAUER REPLIED THAT
HE HAPPENED TO HAVE, BY COINCIDENCE, HIS COMPANY' S OFFER. HE THEN
I PROCEEDED
CITY OF
COUNCI' LMAN
TO READ
FORT WALTON. BEACH,
LONG1 FOR
A LETTER
THE
DA~~
FLORIDA.
RECORD,
O APRIL
MADE
30,
THE
1963,
FOLLOWING
ADDRESSED
STATEMENT:
TO THE
THE HIGH BIDDER OUT ~ F SIX BIOS BID A FISCAL ACENT FEE
OF . 75% WHICH AMOUNTS TO $ 8, 625. 00, TO WHICH ADVERTISING,
PRINTING AND OTHER 6HARGES TOTALLING $ 3, 250. 00 MusT BE
ADDED. THIS IS A GRANO TOTAL OF $ 1 I, 875. 00 IN COSTS TO THE
CITY. THE SECOND HIGH BIDDER, PIERCE, CARRISON & WULBERN,
OF BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA, BID AN ALL INCLUSIVE FEE OF . 6%
WHICH AMOUNTS TO $ 6, 900. 00. THE FIRM OF PIERCE, CARRISON &
WULBERN MADE A FIRM BID OF . 375% RATE ON THE UTILITIES TAX
BONDS WHICH WERE BEING CONSIDERED AT THAT TIME. PARALLELING
THIS OFFER TO THE PROPOSAL OF IRA HAUPT & COMPANY THERE IS
A DIFFERENCE OF $ 4, 975. 00 IN COSTS AND AN AVERAGE DIFFER-
ENCE OF . 175% INTEREST CHARGES."
MR. HANAUER SUGGESTED THAT IN VIEW OF COUNCILMAN LONG' S FEELING
HIS COMPANY, WOULD NOT SUBMIT ANY BID AND WOULD GO DIRECTLY TO
PUBLIC SALE.
MR. TOLBERT MOVED THAT THIS MEETING BE RECESSED UNTIL 7: 30 P. M.,
BUT AFTER DISCUSSION, MR. TOLBERT WITHDREW HIS MOTION.
COUNCILMAN JONES MOVED THAT COUNCIL ACCEPT IRA HAUPT' S OFFER TO BUY
THE UTILITIES TAX CERTIFICATES AS OUTLINED IN THE PROPOSAL JUST
PRESENTED. MR. TOLBERT SECONDED THE MOTION AND THE VOTE WAS:
AYE - ~ OGERS, TOLBERT AND JONES
NAY - LONG AND CARNATHAN
AT 5: 57 P. M. MOTION WAS MADE TO RECESS THIS MEETING UNTIL 7: 30 P. M.,
COUNCILMAN ROGERS SECONDED THE MOTION AND THE VOTE WAS:
AYE ROGERS, TOLBERT AND JONES
NAY - LONG AND CARNATHAN
I
MAYOR RECESSED MEETING UNTIL 7: 30 P. M.
MAYOR RE- OPENED MEETING AT 7: 28 P. M.
COUNCILMAN LONG READ WAIVER OF NOTICE OF MEETING. INASMUCH AS THE
MEETING WAS CALLED FOR THE PURPOSE OF THE PRESENTATION OF THE BOND
ORDINANCE BY MR. LEONARD HANAUER, AND AS T~ E ORDINANCE HAD ALREADY
BEEN A DOPTED, THE MEETING WAS OUT OF ORDER. ATTORNEY SMITH SAID
THIS WAS TRUE. COUNCILMAN LONG ~ OVED THAT THIS MEETING BE ADJO~ RNED,
SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN CARNATHANo
r.: ( ;.\
IN VIEW OF THE MOTION BY COUNCILMAN LONG AND BECAUSE SOMEONE MIGHT
TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE OFFER OF IRA HAUPT & COMPANY, MR. HANAUER
WITH@REW THIS QFFER AND REQUESTED THE TWO CO~ IES OF SAME WHICH HAD
BEEN ~ ANDED. TO THE CITY MANAGER AND CITY ATTORNEY, RESPECTIVELY,
BE RETURNED. HE FURTHER $ TATED THAT ~ E WOULD RETURN AT WHATEVER
DATE WAS SET FOR NEXT COUN~ IL ME~ TING AND MAKE AN OFFER AT THAT
TIME AND WOULD LIKE THE OPPORTUN. TY TO DO SO.
COUNCILMAN TOLBeRT CALLED A SPECIAL MEETING OF CITY COUNCIL, AT
2: 00 P. M. ON THE AFTERNOON OF TUESDAY, MAY 7, 1963, AND STATED
THAT NO NOTICE OF wAIVER WAS ~ EQUIRED.
MAYOR ADJOURNED THE ME TIt,lGAT 7: 41 P. M.
ADOPTED ~ iI, ; 0; 63
U
APPROVED~ t;~
MAY ~
ATTEST
d~ )
j_
CITY CLERK CV---'
