READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Fort Walton Beach Council minutes — 06-12-1977 Regular — reading text
Part 7 of 9. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — fwb-2503-original.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
If we can strike every place where we
say membership. That is a bad word. If
we can request that we develop out of
this committee a reasonable annual fee,
that will give you in your budget money
that you can count on. If we can develop
an annual fee, it is possible to do it
that way. Your transients will be happy
to pay $ 2. 00 to use the facility. If
you would table it so that you don' t make
any firm decisions tonight.
Mr. Rigdon recommended that the recommen-
dations be read.
Mayor called for a vote on the original
motion to reduce the trial period from
six months to four months. Motion carried
unanimously.
Buddy Elliott read the following recom-
mendations:
r
78
Julx 12Af 1977
TO: CITY MANAGER
FROM: SUPERINTENDENT OF RECREATION
SUBJECT: REDUCED RATES FOR CHILDREN, 17 YEARS OF AGE AND
UNDER. I
RECOMMENDATION:
1) TENNIS CITIZENS' COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
Recommend that the tennis from $ 1. 00 ,.for
fee be reduced
residents ' and $ 1. 50 for non- residents. to $. 50 for resi-
dents and $. 75 for non- residents, 17 years of age and
under.
2) RECREATION DIRECTOR' S RECOMMENDATION:
c.'
As a Recreation Director. I personally reel that con-
cessions should possibly be made for the 17 years of age
and' t1nder . Iroup.
At the same time, I also feel an obligation to the City
taxpayers to make the Tennis Center as self- sufficient
as possible. "
if the
The refo re, above tennis ci ti zens f
it tee
co_
recommendation is approved, personally feel that the
I
following additions should be added to it:
1.' ' The light fee, would remain in effect at & 11' times for
everyc)ne. ' . '
2. The' regular rates C1l.' mi-~ r.esid~ nt and $ l. 50-- non-
resident) would be in effect on Saturdays, Sund~ ys, and
Holidays I~ r everyone.
3. Regular rates would be in effec.t from 6 : 00 p .. until
m..
c.1: osing every clay for everyone. '
icat1on' tor the above
stif."
threereconim~ c!3.~1~n5: ",
Ju.
r4er to meet
ght b1l1 must be paia
in;' ~ our;
1) , The" i~
bu~ et. ';
Prime time 1s after
6: 00 p. m.' at n1-ght and '~~
2) ed
7r, court5: ; are,
t~ d~~~s Sundays and Ho~ 1days.
ld posEdbly lose .
ced rates~ the City cou,
fi-
om. court fe.es.. . ....
50~ of' the expectel1 income
it _ ~, ' " '
d a. ~
7-/:<..- 11-
79
Mr. Rigdon moved that the recommendations
as presented by Recreation Director be
approved. Motion was seconded by Mr.
Brock and carried unanimously.
Mayor thanked the people for coming , to
I
the meeting. We will be keeping a close
watch on it. We want to make it work.
BOD & LIBRARY PROGRESS BOD Report and Library Progress Report
REPORTS were presented for Council information.
HEARING PANEL & PLANNING Mayor presented the fo1l0wi~g recommen-
BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS dations from the Municipal Planning Board
and Hearing Panel:
VARIANCE REQUEST: REQUEST: Variance to Ordinance 100 to
228 AJAX STREET observe 18. 5 ft. front yard setback
instead of the required 2S ft. ( corner
lot) in an R. 1A zone to construct a new
dwelling, single family, affecting pro-
perty located at Lot 1, Block L, Wildwood
Park Subdivision. ( 228 Ajax Street)
HEARING PANEL recommends that request be
approved. This is a corner lot which
requires two frnnt yard setbacks. There
was no one objecting to the variance.
PLANNING BOARD concurs with the recommen-
dation of the Hearing Panel.
Mr. Rigdon moved that the recommendation
be approved Motion was seconded by Mr.
Brock and carried unanimously.
VARIANCE REQUEST: REQUEST: Variance to Ordinance 100 to
46 HEMLOCK DRIVE, N. W. observe a 17 ft. front yard setback instead
of the required 25 ft. in an R- lA zone
to add a double garage to front of building,
affecting property located at Lot 4, Block
B, Re- Subdivision of Municipal Subdivision.
46 Hemlock Drive, N. W.)
HEARING PANEL recommends request be
I approved. 45 Hemlock Drive, N. W. has
the same carport addition to the residence
and the property is very much improved
in appearance.
objecting to the
There was no one present
variance.
PLANNING BOARD concurs with the recommen-
dation of the Hearing Panel.
80 7- 1 L- 77
Mr. Rigdon moved that the recommendation
be approved. Motion was seconded by Mr.
Hill and carried unanimously.
REZONING REQUEST: REQUEST: Rezone from R- 1 to C- 2 the
HOWARD GILL SUBDIVISION following described property: Lot 1and
North 45 ft. of Lot 2, Block 4, Howard
Gill Subdivision; Lots 2 and 3 except
South 15 ft. of Lot 2, Block 2, Howard
Gill Subdivision; Lot 3 and South 23 ft.
of Lot 2, Block 4, Howard Gill Subdiv-
ision; Lot 19, Block 3, Metes and Bounds,
Howard Gill Subdivision.
HEARING PANEL recommends request for
rezoning be a~ proved.
PLANNING BOARD concurs with the recom-
mendation of the Hearing. Panel.
REZONING REQUEST: REQUEST: Rezone from R- l to C- 2 property
HOWARD GILL SUBDIVISION located at Lot 1 and South 15 ft. of
Lot 2, Block 2, Howard Gill Subdivision.
HEARING PANEL recommends request for
rezoning be approved. r
PLANNING BOARD concurs with the recommen-
dation of the Hearing Panel.
Mr. Hunt moved that the recommendations
be approved. Motion was seconded by Mr.
Brock and carried unanimously.
THANK YOU CARD Mayor presented a thank you card from the
Roberts family.
SUPPLEMENTAL HEALTH Mayor presented a letter and information
INSURANCE PROGRAM reference supplemental health insurance
programs offered by American Family Life
Assurance Co.-- Mr. Charles R. Wolf, Jr. &
Mrs. Elsie Alpin.
City Manager explained that this company
would like to offer to the City by way J
of payroll deduction a cancer insurance 1
1
program.
Mr. Hunt moved to refer the information
to the Insurance Committee for study.
Motion was seconded by Mr. Ba~ ghman, and
he added that he feels the City should
compare these prices with other companies.
Motion carried unanimously.
7- 1:1...-? 7 81
Mr.Wolf, representative for American
Family Life Assurance Company, explained
that he indicated in his letter that
