Fort Walton Beach Resolution — 96-25-Amendment of DRI for Pirates Bay — reading text

parking spaces at an attraction or recreational facility by 5 percent or 300 spaces, whichever is greater, or an increase in the number of spectators that may be accommodated at such a facility by 5 percent or 1, 000 spectators, whichever is greater. Impact: Not applicable, no parking spaces are to be added to the development plan. c 2. A new runway, a new terminal facility, a 10 percent expansion to an existing runway, or a 20 percent increase in the floor area of an existing terminal. Impact: Not applicable, the project does not involve an airport. 3. An increase in the number of hospital beds by 5 percent or 60 beds, whichever is greater. Impact: Not applicable, the project does not involve a hospital. 4. An increase in industrial development area by 5 percent or 32 acres, whichever is greater. Impact: Not applicable, there are no proposed industrial uses in the NOC. s. An increase in the average annual acreage mined by 5 percent or 10 acres, whichever is greater, or an increase in the average daily water consumption by a mining by 5 operation percent or 300, 000 gallons, whichever is greater. An increase in the size of the mine by 5 percent or 750 acres, whichever is less.  Page 6 Pirates' Bay . 0 o Nov. 1, 1996 Impact: Not applicable, there are no recreational vehicle c park spaces proposed. 13. A decrease in the area set aside for open space of 5 percent or 20 acres, whichever is less. Impact: The area where the proposed bulkhead is to be located is currently designated for open space and will diminish that area less than 1, 000 square feet. 14. A proposed increase to an approved multi- use development of regional impact where the sum of the increases of each land use as a percentage of the applicable substantial deviation criteria is equal or exceeds 100 percent. The percentage of any decline in the amount of open space shall be treated as an increase for purposes of determining when 100 percent has been reached or exceeded. Impact: Not applicable, the proposed structure is not classified as one of multi- use land use types, office, port, etc. 15. A 15 percent increase in the number of vehicle trips generated by the development above which was projected during the original development- of- regional- impact review. c Impact: Not applicable, the will proposed change not alter the number of vehicle trips generated by the development. 16. Any change which would result in the development of any area which specifically set aside in the was application for development approval or in the development order for preservation or special protection of endangered or threatened plants or animals designated as endangered, threatened or species of special concern and their habitat, primary dunes, or archaeological and historic sites designated as significant by the Division of Historical Resources of the Department of State. Impact: The DRI site contains an archaeological site, a black sand midden, which lies slightly landward from the proposed location of the bulk head site as identified in the attached " Figure 9. Pirates' Bay Archaeological Site 80K183 In Relation To Proposed Construction" from the original Application for Development Approval( ADA). Staff will receive appropriate comments regarding this issue from the Department of State Staff. r'  Page 7 Pirates' Bay 0 o Nov. 1, 1996 Staff Comment: other than whatever impact the proposed change might have on the archaeological site, there does not appear c to be any substantial change to the previously approved development plan. 19)( c) An extension of the date of build out of a development, any phase or by years shall there of, 7 or more be presumed to create a substantial deviation subject to further development- of- regional- impact review. Staff Comment: Not applicable. 19)( d) change in the plan of development of an approved A development of regional impact resulting from requirements imposed by the DEP or any water management district or any appropriate federal agency shall be submitted to the local government pursuant to this subsection. The change shall be presumed not to create a substantial deviation subject to further review. The presumption may be rebutted by clear and convincing evidence at the public hearing held by the local government. Staff Comment: Not applicable, the changes are not as a result of other agency action. 19)( e) 1. A proposed change which, either individually or, c if there were previous changes, cumulatively with those changes, is equal to 40 percent of any numerical criterion in subparagraphs ( b) 1.- 15., but which does not exceed such criterion, shall be presumed not to create a substantial deviation subject to further DRI review. The presumption may be rebutted by clear and convincing evidence presented at the public hearing. Staff Comment: None of the previously changes have cumulatively or individually equalled as much as a forty percent total of any criterion. 19)( e) 2. A proposed change that individually or cumulatively with any previous change is less than 40 percent of any numerical criterion and does not exceed any other criterion, or that involves the extension of the build out date less than 5 years is not subject to the public hearing requirements. Staff Comment: The proposed change to the development order does not exceed any of the criterion nor is it a request for an extension of the build out time. 19)( e) 3. Any addition of land previously reviewed or not any change specified not in paragraphs ( b) or ( c) shall be c presumed to create a substantial deviation. This presumption  Page 9 Pirates' Bay u 6 Nov. 1, 1996 process for marine construction for piers, docks, boathouses or bulkheads when these structures are required to be permitted under State Statutes. City Council has retained jurisdiction to authorize all marine construction under the following process: 1) The applicant shall submit to the Department of Community Development Services( CDS) copies of applications, plans and