READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Amendments to the Constitution, [8 June] 1789 — reading text
Part 93 of 141. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — congressional-register-volume1-1789.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
reprejented there; Ihe,
as well as the adopting dates, fubinitied that iultrument t»
412 DEBATES
i'coiivention of the people, but not having adopted it, Hie
A. 1789,
has again called a corivention, and is proceedino- to recon-
fider It as fait as convenient ; fo I'uch a rcqueft as is nov/
propoleci, would be unneceflary with refptft to them. Ag
ilhode Ifland did not iend ujtiniberG to the firft convention,
there was a delicacy in tranrniitting the proceedings to thenij
and congrcfs could not perhaps apply to them with the
ia'ne propriety as to another. But all we are now to con-
iider, I believe, is, that we invite the Itate oiRliode-lfland
to join our confederacy, what will be the efFcd: of fuch a
tn^albrev.'e cannot tell til! w'e try it.
Mr. Page
though he had great deference for the mover, yet
Said,
he conceited the motion oUsht not to come before Con-
grefs. lie feared they would make themfelves a party in
the bu fine fs if they interfered, and he wifhed to avoid
having any. thing to do with clieir bickerings and difjiutes ;
it was enougii for them to do the bufuiefs they were fent
upon, and not to'attempt works of fupererogation. From
the rei'pett he had for the gf nten-.an, and from the deli-
caie !i nation in which the honfe was involved, he hbped
ViVi mocion would be withdrawn.
''-
Mr.'-' Ames.
If tiie firuation of the houfe was delicate, it was alfo
denp^erous in feme degree ; but he did not think it would
relieve them by withdrawing the motion. If the gentle-
man felt ferious on tlie fubjtd, if there was danger in the
Jneafiire,' it oiight: to be well
examined. But this was an•
arguai€nr for going inid a committee of the whole, Sure-
jy geinlen^e'n are 'not afraid of knowing our fuuation .''
Then vvhy'oppofe the means of coming at that knov/ledge ?
It is not poflible to conceive this queflion can be long
evaded. Then what advantage is propofed from procrafti-
'
nation ? For his part he could difcover none ; and there-
fore Was in favour of refolving' into a committee of \ht
tvhole.
Mr. Page
Had heard the word dai'ger,' but did not hear didin^lly
the genllenran's arguments. He thought the houfe rui;
the riik of involving themfelves as partic, and incur all
the Jaiioievs to which fuch a fituation would expofe them.
fie thought ihe befi way to avoid the danger was to ftay
^'h^re tlie'y were.
*;''";' "'
'
Tvlr. Madison.
1 believe, Mr. fpeaker. there are cafes in which it ^
A. 1789. Of ,.C O N Ct R E S S. 415
prudent to avoid coming to a dccifion at all, and cafes where
it is defirable to evade debate ; if there were not cafes of
this kind, it would be unnecefl'ary to guard our difcuffions
with the previous queltion. My idea on the fubjedl now
before the houfe is, that it would be improper in this
body to expofe theuiieives to have fuch a propofition re-
jedted by the legiflature of the itate of Rhode-Ifland : It
would hkewife be improper to exprtTs a defire on an occa-
fion where a free agency ought to be emj.loyed, which
would carry with it all the force of a command. How far
this is contemplated on the prefect occafion I cannot tell,
but I heartily' wiih that as little may be laid about it as
pofiible. I conceive this to be one of the cafes to which
the previous queftion is applicable ; and if the gentleman
means to call the houfe to a dire»l; decilion on this motion,
I fhall flep between and interpofe the previous queftion.
Mr. Ames
I am againft- the previous queltion being taken, becauie
1 wilh the houfe to conlider the motion made by the gen-
tleman from New-York it ih admitted to be a quehion of
;
confiderable importance, if it is, it ought to be confidered ;
otherwife we are Ihu'ting the door on information, and
puting it out of our power to ascertain the propriety or
impropriety of the motion.
I Ihould be glad to know if any gentleman contemplates
the (fate oi Rhode-Ifland, dificvered from the union; a
maritime iiate, lituated in the moil convenient manner for
the purpofe of fmuggling and defrauding our revenue.
Surely a moment's refled;ion will induce the houfe to take
meafures to fecure this objed;. Do gentlemen imagine
that Itate will join the union ? if they do, what is the injury
ariling from the adoption of the refolution intended to be
fubmitted to the committee ? is there any impropriety in
deliring them to confider a queftion which they have not
yet decided ? It has beenfuggeded, by an honorable gen-
tleman, that this defire will operate as a demand. If a wifh
of congrefs will bring them' into the union, why ihall we
decline to exprefs fuch a wilh ?
It has been faid, that Rhode-Ifland has never called a
convention, the other States have ; then why ihould
>e decline to requeft them to do what every otlicr State
has been called upon to perform. The gentleman fromi
Virginia feems afraid we fhall facrifice our dignity by ma-
Icing this requeft. Let it be remembered, Great-Britain
4T4 DEBATES A. 17S9.
Joit h-r colonies bv facrific'n her inierefl to her dignity ;
>;
we outNi cheref'H'e to be ciirffal h iw we a5t upon jdeas
of rhi-; IvKiJ. There fee-ns Co w- (.iiTjoacioa ih that Hate to
johi ciieir filler llates in aJiipclii^ ihi Conl'tucion. 'I'hen
why Ih-ill we deciuie encouragin t that good ipirit by ap-
proving the ai-afare?
Mr. White
Thou ^ht It bed: to put the previous quedlon, becaufe
it was iiir)rOj>er for this legillature to interfere in their de-
liberarion. If the/ were cld'pnfed to adopt the conftitu-
tioD, it w juld be belt to let thein exarcife their jadg.nent,
independent of any influence which a recommendation from
this C jrjj-refs mip;hc hive.
The previous qaeilion being inufted upon, was put—
'' fha'd th^ main quellion be now put ;" and it was deter-
raiaed in ths negative. Adjourned,
June B.
Another member, viz. M
diael Jenifer Stone, from
Maryland, appeared and took liis feat the oath to fupport
;
the confliitution of the United States hiving been Hrll ad-
miniftered to him by the fpeaker, purfuant to a late ad of
congrefs.
Apetition of Nicholas Pike, of Newburyport, in the
ftate of Maffachufetis, was prefented to the houfe and read,
praying that an exclulive privilege any be granted him for
a limited time, in the publication of a work which he ha§
lately written, entitled, *' A
new and co;nplete Syftem of
Arithmetic."
Ordered, t'nat the Hiid petition be referred to Mr. Hunt-
ington,Mr. Cadwa'aJer, and Mr. Contee that they do ;
examine the matter thereof, and report the fame with their
opinion thereupon, to the houfe.
A aiellage from the fenate, by Mr. Oils, their fecretary.
—
Mr. fpeaker The fenate concur in the refulution of this
houle, of the 2o;h ultimo, fov furnifliing each ineuiber of
the prefent congrefs with a com;)!ete fet of the journals of
the late conin\l's. And he then v^ithdrew.
Mr. ^vIadisox
This day Mr. Speaker, is the d ly alligned for taking into
confideration the fubjed of ameiidments to the conltitution.
As I conlidere myfelf bound in honor and in duty to do
I
what I have done on this fubject, 1 Ihall proceed to bring
the amendments before you as foon as polTible, and advo-
cate ihsm until they ihall be finally 3do])ted or rejeded by
a conftitutional majority of this houfe. With a view of
A.r/Sp- O-F G a
N G R E S S. ^r^
drawing your attention to this important objecl, I fljall
move, that this houfe do now refolve itlelf into a commit-
tee of the whole, on the Hate of the union, by which an op-
portunity will be given, to bring forward fome propofitions
which I have ilrong hopes, will meet the unanimous appro-
bation of this houfe, atter the fulleil diicuilion and molt fe-
rious regard. 1 therefore uioveyou, that the houfe now
go into a committee on this bufinefs.
IMr. Smith
Was not inclined to interrupt the mcafures which the
public were fo anxioufly expccliling, by going into a com-
mittee of the whole at this time. He obferve<l there were
two modes of introducing this bufmefs to the houfe One :
by appointing a feledl committee to take into conllderatioa
the I'everal a neudments projiofed by the (late conventions ;
this he thought the molt 1-kely way to fhorten the bufinefs.
The other was, that the gentleman fhouid lay his propoli-
tions on the table, for the confideraiion of the members ;
that they fhouid be printed, and taken up for difcuflion at
a future day. Either of thelc modes would enable tlitj
houfe to enter upon the bufinefs better prepared thau
could be the cafe by a fudden tranfition from other im-
portant concerns to which their minds werellrongly bent.
He therefore hoped ihe honorable gentleman w ould confent
to bring the lubjfcl forward in one of thofe ways, in pie-
ference to going into a committee of the whole. For, faid
he, it n^uft appear extremely impolitic to go into the con-
fideration of amending the government, before it js orga-
nized, before it has begun to operate ; certainly upon re-
fleclion itmuff appear to be premature. 1 wi(h, therefore,
gentlemen will confen: to the delay : for the bufinefs
—
which lies in an unfinifhed ftate I mean .particularly the
colledtion bill —is neccfl'ary to be pad'ed ; elfe all we have
hitherto done is of no effect. If we go into the difcufTion
of this fubjec^, it will take us three weeks or a month ;
and during all this tiine every other bufinefs muft be fuf-
pended, becaufe we cannot proceed w ith either accuracy
or difpatch when the mind is perpetually fhifted from one
fubjedl to another.
Mr. Jackson.
I am of opinion vie ought not to be in a hurry with re-
fpeft to altering the coi.ltitution. For njy part I have no
idea of fpeculaiing in this ferious manner on theory if I ;
iigree to alterations in the njode of adininiiiering this go-
vcrn;nent; I iliall like to ftand on the fure ground of ex-
4.t6 debates
perience, and not be treading air.
a. 1789.
What experience have
we had of the good or bad qualifies of this conftitution ?
Can any gentleman afHriii to me one propofition that is a
certain and abfolute amendment ? I deny that he can.
Our coniiitution, iir, is hke a velFel jult launched, and ly-
ing at the wharf, Ihe is untried, you can hardly (Hfcover
any one. of her properties ; it is not known how Ihe will
anfwer her helm, or lay her courfe ; whether ihe will bear
in fafety the precious freight to be depofited in her hold.
But, in this ftate, will the prudent merchant attempt alter-
ations ? Will he employ two thoufaud workmen to tear off
the planking and take afunder the frame ? He certainly will
nor. Let us gentlemen, fit out our veflel, fee up her maft?j,
and expand her fjils, and be guided by the experimenc in
our alterations. If (he foils upon an uneven keel, let us
right her by
