READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Fort Walton Beach Council agenda — 02-12-02 regular Council agenda — reading text
Part 40 of 61. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — fwb-9588-original.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
00 CJ\
z
CITY OF FORT WALTON BEACH
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
DATE: January 23, 2002
TO: Reid Silverboard, City
THROUGH: Missy McKim, Director
Commwnty Development Services Department
FROM: Mary Cox, CDBG Specialist
SUBJECT: REQUEST AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD A BID FOR RESIDENTIAL
REHABILITATION PROJECT - 112 THIRD AVENUE
BACKGROUND:
The scope of work and renovation specifications were provided by A +Home Inspection Services in
accordance with the contract with the City. Ponderosa Builders submitted the low bid of $16, 260. 00 for the
on labor
scope of services. Ponderosa Builders performance period is 60 days 'with a one- year \varranty
and materials
SUMMARY:
Pursuant to Chapter 2, Section 22- 226, Fort Walton Beach Code of Ordinances, Purchasing Policies and
Procedures, staff request authorization to award a bid for residential rehabilitation of 112 TInrd Avenue, to
the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, Ponderosa Builders. The contract alllOtUlt is not to exceed
16, 260, 00. TIns property is being rehabilitated wIder the City' s COnl111wnty Development Block Grant
Program, ( FY 2001- 2002).
The City allocated $ 125,950. 00 of CDBG (FY-2002) fimds to pay for residential rehabilitation projects.
Below is a description of the property:
NAME: Tony Lovelace
ADDRESS: 112 TInrd Avenue
REHABILITATION COST ESTIMATOR (A+ HOME INSPECTION): $ 13,930. 00
PONDEROSA BUILDERS: $ 16, 260. 00
Staff followed the Rehabilitation Policies and Procedures ( adopted by Resolution # 81- 7, on February 24,
1981), for preparing, processing and approving the application for Rehabilitation Grant. Staff followed the
policies and procedures and performed the following:
Interview and advised grant applicant;
Advised prospective applicants on the availability and benefits of a rehabilitation grant;
Advised applicantsconcerning the specific conditions under wInch a grant is awarded;
Coordinated work write-ups using a Rehabilitation Cost Estimator. TIle cost estimator is a
certified contractor that is selected through the bidding process. TIle cost estimator detennines
what eligible work should be perfonned to bring the homes up to standard conditions
Coordinate the solicitation of bids from qualified contractors.
t2-
The nex1 step is to receive City Council approval. Follmving COlUlcil approval, staff will:
Prepare constmction contract documents;
Inspect rehabilitation work on a regular basis to see that all code violations are rectified and to
assure that all work is done according to code;
Make final inspection of rehabilitation work and issue certificate of final approval of all \york
perfonl1ed;
Obtain from contractor, all warranties, release of liens, fmal invoices, and warranties from the
general contractor prior to final payment for rehabilitation work;
Make periodic follow-up inspections on work to make sure it is maintained.
As seen on the Bid Tabulation Sheet, Ponderosa Builders was the only bidder to bid on the above project.
Based on input from the cost estimator, Ponderosa Builders bid at $ 16, 260. 00 appears appropriate.
FINANCIAL DATA
1. DEPARTMENT: Conu11lmity Development Services
2. DIVISION: NA
3. FUND: Conullunity Development Block Grant
4. ACCOUNT: 107- 1930- 554- 5207
5. ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION: Residential Rehabilitation
6. FISCAL YEAR BUDGET: FY 2001- 2002
7. AMOUNT BUDGETED: $ 125, 950. 00
8. GRANT FUNDS: YES X NO AMOUNT $ 16, 260. 00
9. FUND TRANSFER: YES_ NO X AMOUNT NA
10. FROM ACCOUNT #: NA
11. TO ACCOUNT #: NA
12. REASON FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR TRANSFER: NA
13. PRICE ANALYSIS: ATTACHED X ADD' LMATFDR_ NONE
BID ITEM DATA
14. DESCRIPTION OF BID ITEM: Rehab single-family residence 112 Third Avenue
15. SUPPLEMENT MATERIAL: ATTACHED X ADD' L MAT FDR NONE
16. # BID INVITATIONS SENT: 20
17. # BID RECEIVED: 2
18. # RESPONSIVE BIDS: 2
19. RECOMMEND VENDOR: Ponderosa Builders
20. BID AWARD AMOUNT: $ 16,260. 00
21. COMMENTS: NA
22. ESTIMATED QUANTITY TO BE PURCHASED (BULK ITEMS): NA
23. ESTIMATED PURCHASED AMOUNT: NA
24. BID TABULATION ATTACHED: YES ~ NO_ ADD' L MAT FDR
25, TERM OF CONTRACT: NA
26. BID VALID TO: NA
27. BID PRICE VALID FOR TERM OF CONTRACT: YES_ NO NA X
28, WARRANTY PERIOD: ONE YEAR
29. TIME NEEDED FOR JOB COMPLETION: 60 Days
30. STATE CONTRACT: YES NO ~
31. CONTRACT #: NA
32. CO- OP PURCHASE: YES NO ~
33. AGENCY: NA
34. EXPECTED LIFE OF ITEM: NA
34. EXPECTED LIFE OF ITEM: NA
35. ITEM DEMO' D: YES_ NO ~
36. REFERENCES CHECKED: NO
37. CONTRACT: ATTACHED_ ADD' LMATFDR_ NA X
APPROVED FOR LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: YES NO_ NA X
38, CONTRACT
39. CURRENT VENDOR: NA
40. CURRENT PRICE: NA
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that Ponderosa Builders be awarded the bid.
Attacluuents:
MEMO FROM PURCHASING
BID TABULATION SHEET
WORK WRITE- UPS
REPORT PREPARED BY: '- Il1~ (~ D te
h.
s-
Mary Cox, C G S cialist
REVIEWED AND SUBMITTED BY: - In I
m e(~ gz-.>/
te /
o ~
Missy McKim, Director
0 9'3~ t:
n /I f)
j ( ) r.~
2.. 7
REVIEWED AND CONCUR: I~ J~
Reid Silverboard, City Manager
Comments:
City of Fort Walton Beach
MEMORANDUM
DATE: January 16, 2002
TO: Missy McKim
CDS Director
FROM: Michael Tatum / tt
Purchasing Director J
{ 7
SUBJECT: Rehabiliate Six ( 6) Residences
Bid # 02- 106
for your review. Please take the necessary
The referenced bid tabulation is forwarded
for Approval by the City Manager and
action so that we may prepare the Memorandum
Council. The bid file is available for review at the Purchasing Department.
to Purchasing on the
for those items applicable
The following information is furnished
Request To Award Bid Memorandum:
NO.lDESCRIPTON
RESPONSE
ITEM
20
16. Number of Bids Solicited
2
17. Number of Bids Received
2
18. Number of Responsive Bids
Yes
24. Tabulation Attached
No
30. State Contract
MT Ime
N
o
o
N
iG
r.
ri'
C"'" 0
S
1/1
ns 0
s J
c
ra c
I
ii
0
1/1
0
J
c
I
en en "
LO 0 co
0
C") (],) (],)
ro E ~
I 0 0 0 ..- ro (],)
0 ~ 0 co C") s-o
... ro ro - >- >-
0 >-
u.. a 0 (],) "
0) 0 r-- cO 0) I.
iC'. 0 c:
en . c ii co co co LO I'- 0)
..-0 0 Z ro ......
0) N N_ N_O) co co -
Q) ro 0
