Fort Walton Beach Council agenda — 02-12-02 regular Council agenda — reading text

this case was brought for public hearing before the Board on OCTOBER 11, 2000. The Board found that the violation( s) did exist, and ordered the Respondent( s) to correct said violation( s) on or before OCTOBER 26, 2000. Reinspection of subject property on OCTOBER 26, 2000 verified that said violation( s) had not been corrected as ordered. II. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: The Respondents, by reason of the foregoing facts, did not comply wi th the OCTOBER 11, 2000 order of thi s Board, in that the Respondents di d not correct the cited violation( s) on or before OCTOBER 26, 2000, as specified in said order. III. SECOND ORDER: 1. The Finding of Noncompliance is hereby accepted, the Respondent( s) not having corrected the aforesaid violation( s) on or before OCTOBER 26, 2000. 2. The Respondent( s) is/ are hereby ordered to correct the aforesaid violation( s) and to pay a fine of ($ 100. 00 ) per day for each day the violation( s) continue( s) beyond ( October 26. 2000). The Respondent( s) is/ are further ordered to contact the Department of community Development Services to arrange for reinspection of subject property in order to verify the date on which said violation( s) has/ have been corrected. The Board also finds that since the Respondent failed to correct the violation as above before OCTOBER 26, 2000, that the Respondent owes an Admi ni strati ve Fee of $ 120. 00 due and payable by the fi rst day of the month fo11 owi ng thi s order, to c.Qmp- t~the ci ty for a.ctua 1 en..s-a-' costs of p- uti on to the date of the rosec:. hearing. The Board may order additional Administrative Fees should the----- Respondent( s) fail to correct the violation( s) as ordered. a. order to protect the health, In safety, and welfare of the general public, the City of Fort Walton Beach may initiate proceedings, correct violation( s) and assess the costs of these actions against the in accordance wi th secti on 20- 2602, of the ci ty of Fort property, walton Beach Code of ordinances. b. Upon recording of this Order in the Records Public of okaloosa Florida, the aforesaid fines and assessments levied against the county, page - 2-  OF~~~ IAL RECORDS ** L. 22~ l PG 750 shall constitute a lien against the land on which the Respondent( s) owned by the aforesaid Code violation exists, or, if said land is not owned by the Respondent( s), against any other real or personal property Respondent( s). c. should aforementioned lien remain unpaid three ( 3) months the Record of after the recording of this second order in the public action okaloosa county, Florida, the Board may in a subsequent to foreclose on authorize the City Attorney to initiate proceedings for by of statute for the foreclosure this lien in the manner provided other municipal liens. d. A true and correct copy of this Action and second order shall be sent Public to the Respondent( s) by regular mail and shall be recorded in the Records of okaloosa county, Florida. DONE AND ORDERED FEBRUARY 14, 2001 MUNICIPAL CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD OF THE CITY OF FORT WALTON BEACH, FLORIDA By: ). J2 a~.. chairman, code Enforcement Board) I HEREBY that a true and correct copy of the CERTIFY foregoing Action this and second order has been mailed to the Respondent( s), l aOo:l/). I J -, day of ( I~ r~ ), ( By: ~~ code Enforcement Board Administrator CEMRGD04/ HTLTR/ CELTR/ PROD m.._~ page - 3-  CITY OF FORT W AL TON BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM Date: January 22, 2002 To: Reid Silverboard, City Manager Through: From: Missy McKim, AICP, Director Community Development Servic Flinn Fagg, AICP, Planner II I Community Development Services SUBJECT: RESIDENTIAL REHABILITATION PROGRAM- REQUEST TO AWARD CONTRACT FOR REPAIR WORK AT 22 TUPELO AVENUE SE BACKGROUND City Council approved the CRA Residential Rehabilitation Program in October 1999. The program is available to low- and very- low income residents of the CRA area, with a maximum grant amount limited to $ 25, 000. 00. The grant is secured by placing a lien upon the property. Staff received and approved an application from Ms. Cathern Arnett, of 22 Tupelo Avenue SE, in October 2001. Ms. Arnett had originally applied to the CDBG program; however, since her residence is located within the CRA area, CRA funds will be used for the rehabilitation of the residence. The scope of work and renovation specifications were provided by A+ Home Inspection Services in accordance with their contract with the City. Ponderosa Builders submitted the low bid of 24, 989. 00 for the scope of services. SUMMARY Pursuant to Chapter 2, Section 2- 266, Purchasing Policies and Procedures, Ft. Walton Beach Code of Ordinances, staff requests authorization to award the contract for rehabilitation services to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, Ponderosa Builders. The contract amount is not to exceed 24, 989, 00. If approved, sufficient funds are available from account # 109- 0000- 0271- 0000, CRA Special Revenue Fund. Staff recommends that City Council approve the contract with Ponderosa Builders. 0  FIN A N C I A L D A T A 1. DEPARTMENT: Community Development Services 2. DIVISION: Planning & Zoning 3. FUND: CRA Special Revenue Fund 4. ACCOUNT #: 109- 5068- 552- 6997 5. ACCT. DESCRIPTION: CIP # 5068- Residential Rehab/ Putty & Paint 6. FY BUDGET: 2001- 2002 7. AMOUNT BUDGETED: $ 50, 000 ( 2001- 2002); $ 83, 471 carried over from prior years. 8. GRANT FUNDS: YES NO X AMOUNT 9. FUND TRANSFER: YES NO X AMOUNT 10. FROM ACCT: N/ A 11. TO ACCT: N/ A 12. REASON FUNDS AVAILABEL FOR TRANSFER: N/ A 13. PRICE ANALYSIS: ATTACHED X ADD' L MAT FDR NONE BID I T E M D A T A 14. DESCRIPTION OF BID ITEM: Rehabilitation of the residence at 22 Tupelo Avenue SE. 15. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: ATTACHED X ADD' L MAT FDR NONE 16. # BID INVITATIONS SENT: 20 17. # BIDS RECEIVED: 2 18. # RESPONSIVE BIDS: 2 19. RECOMMENDED VENDOR: Unlimited Renovations 20. BID AWARD AMOUNT: Not to exceed $ 24, 989. 00 21. COMMENTS: 22. ESTIMATED QUANTITY TO BE PURCHASED: N/ A 23. ESTIMATED PURCHASE AMOUNT: N/ A 24. BID TABULATION ATTACHED: YES X NO ADD' L MAT FDR 25. TERM OF CONTRACT: Completion of services. 26. BID PRICE VALID FOR TERM OF CONTRACT: YES X NO 27. WARRANTY PERIOD: One year- labor; mfg. standard- materials. 28. DELIVERY TIME: 60 days 29. STATE CONTRACT: YES NO X 30. CONTRACT #: N/ A 31. CO- OP PURCHASE: YES NO X 32. AGENCY: N/ A 33. EXPECTED LIFE OF ITEM: N/ A 34. ITEM DEMO' D: YES NO 35. REFERENCES CHECKED: YES X NO N/ A 36. CONTRACT: