READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Fort Walton Beach Resolution — 2009-37-Accept Joint Land Use Study — reading text
Part 3 of 7. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — fwb-17273-original.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
I I~
I I ~
I
I .......
I :
t
G::
ifl j ' j_:
ii
i! ~ ~
I.~. t:: 1...
c~
g'
S i ~v
DiM
Section 7 - FORT WALTON BEACH TETRA TECH
EGLIN AIR FORCE BASE JOINT LAND USE STUDY ~
JUNE
20091
prescribing flight path area and vertical clearances from In May 2006, the Air Force conducted a Building Height
terrain and manmade obstructions. This required open Study for the Southern Region of Okaloosa County to help
space is defined both vertically and horizontally, and is de- ensure that there were no navigation problems. Figure 7-4
signed above the airfield imaginary surfaces. The restric- identifies the maximum building heights resulting from this
tions prescribed for standard instrument approach and de- study.
parture procedures require limitations on the height of build-
ings and other structures in the vicinity of airfields in order 7. 2. 5 Lighting
to ensure the safety of pilots, aircraft, and individuals and
Outdoor lights can cause difficult and unsafe flying condi-
structures on the ground ( U. S. Air Force, 1999). These
tions when located near airfields or within Military Training
procedures are a complex set of specific requirements that Routes used during night hours with night vision equipment.
ensure the proper clearances exist for aircraft to safely take
Ground lighting can interfere with a pilot' s vision or with
off, land, and circle, when required. The requirements for
each surface of a TERPS airfield are specified in FAA Or-
night vision instrumentation or equipment. Ground lighting
may also cause confusion with approach landing patterns.
ders 8260.3B, " U. S. Standard for Terminal Instrument Pro-
cedures" ( TERPS) ( July 7, 1976) and 8260. 19C, " Flight
Examples of ground lighting that can interfere with night
vision equipment are residential street lighting, stadium
Procedures and Airspace" (September 16, 1993).
lighting, amusement parks, golf courses and driving ranges
if lit at night), and parking lot lighting. Mobile lights ( from
TERPs have been designed for all major airfields on Eglin:
sources such as motor vehicles or roaming spotlights) can
Eglin' s Main Airfield, Duke Field, Choctaw Field and Hurl- also cause pilot disorientation and difficulty with night vision
burt' s Main Airfield. Airfields with instrumented landing
equipment. Several airfields, drop zones, and military train-
systems ( ILS) are categorized based on aircraft that will
use the airfield and conditions available for landing with
ing routes occurring on or over Eglin AFB and adjacent
lands conduct these types of training, especially those as-
instruments. The categories provide minimum altitudes at
sociated with Hurlburt' s 1 SOW.
which a pilot must be able to see the runway prior to touch-
ing down with the aircraft. For example, Category I airfields Also, Eglin is home to the U. S. Army 6th Ranger Training
with ILS have a 200- foot above ground minimum altitude at
Battalion, and the future home of the 7th Special Forces
which the pilot must see the runway. This has a trickle
down effect when it comes to heights of objects in the vicin-
Group ( Airborne). Training for night operations is mission-
essential to these units. Light encroachment can be light
ity of airfields. trespass, glare, sky glow or any unintended consequence
from artificial lighting. Light trespass is illuminating areas
An additional complicating factor in altitudes and tall struc-
not intended. Glare results from overly bright lights and
tures is weather conditions. As tall structures cause aircraft
interferes with vision. Sky glow is the illumination of the sky
to fly higher prior to landing, conflicts can arise as a result
from artificial sources. Figure 7-5 shows the increase in
of cloud ceiling heights and minimum altitudes prescribed
artificial lighting that is visible from satellites. It is clearly
by instrument approach procedures. If the cloud ceiling evident that the amount of lights is increasing with popula-
height changes due to weather and becomes lower than tion.
the acceptable altitude at which an aircraft can descend
with instruments, the airfield is essentially unusable and no
7. 2. 6 Radio Frequency Interference
aircraft can land. The minimum ceiling height of clouds and
the minimum visibility an air crew needs to plan for an in- According to the RAICUZ, radio frequency is an additional
strument approach is based on the minimum descent alti- element related to land use compatibility. Certain Eglin
tude ( MDA) for non- precision approaches or decision height frequency bands are being encroached upon by devices
DH) for precision approaches. The MDA and DH are that are either sloppy in their frequency control ( e. g., cord-
based on height of obstructions. Past a certain threshold, less phones, cell phones, radio stations, cell towers) or that
the higher the obstruction, the higher the MDA or DH re- leak frequency emissions even if they are not designed to
quired. The higher the MDA or DH, the higher the minimum transmit ( e. g., radar detectors). Certain frequencies within
cloud ceiling needs to be and the greater the visibility needs the radio frequency spectrum are of more concern than
to be. This increase in required weather minimums reduces others, since the frequencies can interfere with the safety of
the availability of the airfield. test missions. If a test item or aircraft is lost due to fre-
quency issues, safety can be compromised beyond what is
acceptable. Training missions tend to use the very high
Section 7 - FORT W ALTON BEACH TETRA TECH
EGLIN AIR FORCE BASE JOINT LAND USE STUDY
JUNE 2009
C'
c:::>
c:::>
Z
I...
i
J1
Z-< i
a:I
J:
co
z rA
o
z~
co
q~ 1:::
1
Ww 1::::
Ul
r.
r..:
L...........: \
91
J
E.
tMP
m
et:. .... ~f' I>ex:
r ...
Ii! I
c CD .;!
0
i
c: : Y
s c:
o E
u .:J
a~
ct:
D
Section 7 - FORT WALTON BEACH TETRA TECH
EGLIN AIR
