READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Fort Walton Beach Council agenda — 06-03-08 workshop agenda — reading text
Part 1 of 128. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — fwb-15459-original.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
CITY OF FORT WALTON BEACH
City Council Workshop Meeting
Agenda - June 3, 2008 - 5 :30 P.M.
City Council Chambers
107 Miracle Strip Parkway, SE
Fort Walton Beach, FL 32548
CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Anderson
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
GENERAL PUBLIC
1. General Public on items of City business. ( No Backup)
WORKSHOP AGENDA
2. Discussion regarding the development of a Stormwater Utility. ( Utilities Director) ( See Backup)
3. Discussion regarding the development of a Fire Assessment Fee. ( Fire Chief, Budget & Grants Manager)
See Backup)
ADJOURN
Any person who decides to appeal any decision made with respect to any matter at this meeting will
need a record of the proceedings, and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of
the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is
to be based. (FS286.0105).
The City of Fort Walton Beach adheres to the American with Disabilities Act and will make reasonable
modifications for access to this meeting upon request. Please call City Clerk Helen Spencer at 850 -833-
9509 to make a request. For Hearing Impaired dial the City Hall TDD # 850 -833 -9925 or 1- 800 -955 -8771
TDD) or 1 - 800 -955 -8770 ( Voice). Requests must be received at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting
in order to allow the City time to provide requested service.
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP
June 3, 2008
Workshop Agenda
General Public
Agenda Item Number: WA- 1
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP
June 3, 2008
Workshop Agenda
Discussion regarding the development of a Stormwater
Utility
Utilities Director)
Agenda Item Number: WA- 2
CITY OF FORT WALTON BEACH
MEMORANDUM
To: Joyce Shanahan, City Manager
From: Sam Wilson, Environmental Specialist
Through: John Hofstad, Utilities Director
Date: May 28, 2007
Subject: Stormwater Utility Implementation Plan
Background:
Since 1937,
when Fort Walton Beach was chartered as a municipality, the area has seen great
changes to its natural landscape. With these changes the need for stormwater management has
evolved.
Over the past several years, the City has developed an extensive inventory of stormwater
infrastructure, which includes:
34 miles of underground stormwater pipe, 61 outfalls to a receiving
body of water, 11 stormwater retention ponds, three ( 3) miles of ditches and streams, and over 1, 300
curb and surface inlets.
This infrastructure is in place to collect and convey stormwater runoff and
to protect the property of the 20,000 plus residents of Fort Walton Beach. The stormwater
infrastructure, some of which was originally installed in the 1930s, networks through 29 local
drainage basins that cover more than 4,789 acres ( 7. 5 square miles). The need for maintenance,
rehabilitation, and new construction is a costly endeavor, especially for an aging stormwater system.
Along with maintenance and infrastructure needs, regulations placed on water quality by State and
Federal entities have increased the need for funding. According to the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System ( NPDES), enforced by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection
FDEP), the City has five ( 5) years to implement a multitude of Best Management Practices ( BMPs).
The requirements of the NPDES program put pressure on a budget that is already strained by other
programs.
The City of Fort Walton Beach has reached a point, through aging infrastructure and
regulations, where additional means to generate revenue, specifically for stormwater needs, are
required.
In June of 2003,
staff prepared a preliminary report showing the need for a Stormwater
Implementation Plan. The Report concluded that serious consideration should be given to
establishing a stormwater utility based on water quality, flooding, and regulatory issues. Key
elements of the Report included stormwater program requirements, control measures, best
management practices, stormwater results, stormwater implementation
utility survey utility
methodology, and organizational responsibilities.
The milestone schedule that follows highlights the various actions taken to develop a stormwater
utility for the City of Fort Walton Beach:
FY 2004/ 05 CIP ( #
5220 Stormwater Management Study) — $65,000 budgeted and approved
by Council
October 2005 Okaloosa County, who suggested a collaborative stormwater management
approach between the County and the municipalities, shifted away from the
Stormwater utility approach and pursued a sales tax increase to fund
Stormwater and road improvements
October 2005
Through coordination with the County, a one -cent sales tax idea was
developed
October 2005 City of FWB CIP ( #5220) placed on hold, waiting on outcome for one -cent
sales tax referendum
September 2006 Voter Referendum /one -cent sales tax defeated
October 2006 Staff directed to reactivate CIP # 5220
January 2007 Staff issued Request for Proposal (RFP) for Stormwater Utility Study
February 2007 Staff received six sealed proposals for RFP
February 2007 Five ( 5) member selection committee scored and ranked firms
May 2007 Staff prepared and presented Stormwater presentation at City Council
Workshop
May 2007 City Council approved contract award for Engineering /Consulting services
to develop a Stormwater Utility Study to top ranked firm
August 2007
Notice to proceed for Engineering /Consulting services for a Stormwater
Utility Study was issued to Tetra Tech Inc.
Discussion:
During the January 22, 2008 City Council Workshop, the City's consultant, Tetra Tech, updated
Council on the progress of the Stormwater Utility Study and the future actions necessary to
implement a stand -alone stormwater utility.
Key progress points stressed during this presentation
were:
Data involving a segment
collection of the residential properties and all of the
commercial properties within the City
Establishment of the Equivalent Residential Unit ( ERU) as the basis for calculating
impervious surface for all properties within the City
Development of a Preliminary Stormwater Master Plan
Development of a preliminary rate structure and cash flow analysis
Since the initial workshop presentation, the City's consultant has concentrated on the remaining
elements of Stormwater utility implementation. The remainder of this report details these efforts
and provides direction on the next steps towards full implementation should Council desire to
pursue the program.
In late February, the City hosted two public meetings to discuss the merits of a Stormwater utility,
the environmental benefits of a defined stormwater management program, and the potential
financial impacts to customers of the new enterprise activity. These meetings targeted commercial
properties and the City' s consultant sent out a total of 80 invitations to the largest parcels with
impervious areas in the business community. While few business leaders turned out for the two
2
presentations,
the concept was generally supported with little opposition voiced by those in
attendance. Based on comments received, this
support largely stems from the perceived
environmental benefits related to managing stormwater runoff in a coastal community and the fact
that mitigation credits would be offered to potentially reduce the customers monthly cost. Public
outreach and awareness will continue to play an important role in securing the necessary public
support to make this program successful.
As referenced in the Interim Draft Implementation Plan prepared by Tetra Tech, the City is facing
many hurdles as it looks for creative and financially feasible ways to manage its critical stormwater
infrastructure.
The NPDES program regulated by the FDEP is yet another unfunded mandate that
will require an enormous capital commitment from the City over the next several years. As the City
enters its next 5 -year permitting cycle, new requirements for Total Maximum Daily Loads ( TMDL)
will limit the level of pollutants transported with stormwater that outfall into area receiving waters.
Updated Best Management Practices ( BMPs) such as stormwater separators, larger and better
designed stormwater retention /detention facilities, improved conveyance systems, and streambank
restoration will be required to ensure these pollutants are captured prior to entering our area waters.
As outlined in the January workshop, the trend nationally has moved towards development of a
stand -alone Stormwater Utility in an effort to manage stormwater infrastructure as a separate
enterprise activity. Stormwater management is widely being viewed as another governmental service
not unlike potable water and sewage treatment.
In comparison to drinking water systems and
sewage treatment systems, stormwater is now tightly regulated and a service that all members of the
community benefit from.
However, the infrastructure was generally ignored until the development of the NPDES program
nationally. The City's infrastructure is no different. Many segments of our stormwater conveyance
system date back to the 1950' s and 1960' s. Minimal design requirements during this time period and
substandard construction materials such as corrugated metal pipe ( CMP) have rendered portions of
the stormwater infrastructure obsolete and inadequate. Coupled with the construction activity over
the past few decades and the resulting increase in impervious surface, much of the City's stormwater
infrastructure is insufficient for handling even moderate storm events. Currently, several million
dollars in immediate needs have been identified with very little Federal and State dollars available
through grant programs.
In summary, Federal and State regulations will require a substantial expenditure by the City over the
next several years.
Current revenue sources are significantly insufficient and grant funding is
minimal or unavailable.
Attempts to combine efforts through a regional stormwater utility have
garnered little support and the City must now address its stormwater infrastructure needs internally
without outside support.
Complicating this effort is the recent passage of Amendment 1 in the State
of Florida.
With the anticipated reduction in
