Okaloosa County BOCC — February 18, 2014 — Insituform Technologies 14-14 — reading text

Further clarifications regarding the scope of this certificate and the applicability of the management system requirements may be obtained by consulting the organization. Certificate No: US003759-1 Issue Date: 9 March 2011 Revision Date: 11 April 2012 SRA [ Mae ? wala «WV, : ; . For Burd4u Veritas Certification North America, Inc. 390 Benmar Drive, Houston, Texas, USA www.us.bureauveritas.com /bve ACCREDITED Certification Awarded To INSITUFORM TECHN OLOGIES, LLC. HQ — 17988 EDISON AVE, CHESTERFIELD, MO, 63005 USA APPENDIX TO CERTIFICATE NUMBER: US003759-1 Bureau Veritas Certification North America, Inc. certifies that the management system of the above organization (including the locations listed below) has been audited and found to be in accordance with the requirements of the management system standards detailed below STANDARDS ISO 9001:2008 CERTIFIED LOCATIONS Site 2 (R&D Quality/Part of HQ Campus): Site 3 (Manufacturing): 160 Corporate Drive, Batesville, MS 38606 17999 Edison Ave, Chesterfield, MO 63005 Site Scope: Manufacturing Site Scope: Design & Development, Applications Engineering, validation/Testing, video Site 4 (Wetout): 7605 18th Street, Edmonton, Alberta T6P 1N9, Site 5 (Wetout): 2130 Stout Field West Drive, Indianapolis, IN 46241 Canada Site Scope: Manufacturing Site scope: Manufacturing Site 6 (Wetout): 912 Stanton Road, Olyphant, PA 18447 Site 7 (Wetout): 3061 Dublin Circle, Bessemer, AL 35022 Site Scope: Manufacturing Site Scope: Manufacturing Site 8 (Wetout): 468 Cypress Road, Ocala, FL 34472 Site 9 (Wetout): 6526 Bluebonnet Parkway, McGregor, TX 76657 Site Scope: Manufacturing Site Scope: Manufacturing Site 10 (Wetout): 2255 West 85 North Cedar City, UT 84721 Site 11 (Wetout): 91-255 Kalaeloa Boulevard, Kapolei, HI 96707 Site Scope: Manufacturing Site Scope: Manufacturing Site 12 (Installation East): 1860 Freeman Parkway, Mableton, Site 13 (Installation Central): 580 Goddard Ave, Chesterfield, MO GA 30126 63005 Site Scope: Preparation and Installation Site Scope: Preparation and Installation Site 14 (Installation West): 9654 Titan Court, Littleton, CO Site 15 (Installation Canada): 7605 18 Street Northwest, Edmonton, 80125 Alberta T6P 1N9, Canada Site Scope: Preparation and Installation Site Scope: Preparation and Installation Subject to the continued satisfactory operation of the Organization’s Management System, this appendix will remain valid until: 8 March 2014 Issue Date: 9 March 2011 Revision Date: 11 April 2012 For Bute) Veritas Certification North America, Inc. 390 Benmar Drive, Houston, Texas, USA Wwww.us. bureauveritas.com/bvc ACCREDITED . Independent Test Results Product tested: Cured-in-Place Pipe Insituform® Process Test: Design Life Conducted hy: Trenchless T Center at Louisi INNOVATIVE METHODS OF TESTING the long-term Toon Unversity tuned by US Army Corps of structural behavior of Cured-in-Place Pipe (CIPP) Engineers demonstrates that the Insituform product design — life exceeds 50 years and that ASTM F-1216 Report Date: . ‘ . August 1994 design recommendations for physical properties are conservative for the Insituform product. The research was conducted by the Trenchless Technology Center (TTC) at Louisiana Tech University and funded by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The purpose was to provide, for the first time, an independent assessment of manufacturer’s claims | The research included both experimental and regarding long-term buckling behavior of their analytical studies related to the application of pipeline rehabilitation products. CIPP and Fold-and-Formed Pipe (FFP) technologies In partially deteriorated, gravity pipeline applications Research conducted by the where onding dd not exist between the plastic Trenchless Technology Center Five manufacturers participated in the test program. Seven different products, including at Lo uIs tana Tech U; TIVE. Ss ity six CIPP products and one FFP product, were evaluated in approximately 200 tests. Insituform ; ? conjir. ms Insituform S products that were tested included Insituform? ° . . Standard, which is a widely used polyester resin 50-year design life. Insitupipe® material, and Insituform® Enhanced, which contains an additive to the polyester resin The expected design [lfe and Jong-term behavior —_to increase the flexural properties of the finished of trenchless pipeline rehabilitation products is Insituform product. — important to owners and engineers in evaluating The plastic pipes were encasad in steel pipes, . the various systems available in the marketplace, with hydrostatic pressure applied between the especially since none of these systems have been =. pipes. To measure long-term performance, in actual service for the design lives claimed. each test remained under constant pressures This becomes even more critical considering for up to 10,000 hours or until failure, whichever the recent growth of the trenchless pipeline occurred first. The test results were plotted and rehabiltation industry and that many products extrapolated beyond the test period to estimate have less than five years of experience. behavior up to 50 years. Standardized material tests (flexure, tensile and pipe stiffness tests) were also conducted to characterize the fundamental properties of the product materials. Figure 1 Figure 2 PUTTING CLAIMS TO THE TEST Overview of Test System and Procedures The installation of all products used in the test was performed by the manufacturers on the Louisiana Tech University campus under close monitoring by TT¢ personnel. Forty specimens each of Insituform x Standard and Insituform Enhanced were tested. Each test specimen was installed to fit snugly inside a 1.83 m (6 ft.) long, 3065 mm (42 in.) internal diameter, schedule 40 steel casing pipe. Each casing pipe was fitted with short, bolted pipe segments (clamshells) at each end. {See Figure 1). " Preparing the specimens for testing involved trim- ming the ends flush with the clamshells, removing the clamshelts, and cleaning the ends of the speci- mens. This resulted in the plastic pipe extending beyond the ends of the steel casing pipes. The specimens were then fitted with end seals applied externally, span- ning the casing pipe and plastic pipe. (See Figure 2). The end seals contained the water at the prescribed pressure, which was Table 1 Material Characterization Tesis (Short. term) supplied between the plastic and casing pipes from a pressurized water distribution system. At least three specimens of each product were used for short-term buckling tests to determine the upper pressure jimit for the long-term tests. A regulator was used to raise the pressure on the specimen, and the rate of load application was kept constant until failure occurred. For the long-term tests, each specimen was pressurized at a controlled rate of 10 psi/minute (69 kPa/minute) until a selected pressure was reached, A minimum of five pressure ievels were selected for each product to cause the specimens to fail at various times over a 10,000-hour test period. Specimens were monitored at least once a day for evidence of buckling. Failures that occurred during normal work hours were monitored Manually, After normal work hours, failures were detected electronically. terial Characterizati ti Numerous tests, including flexural modulus, flexural strength and tensile strength, were conducted on each product according to ASTM standards. On each of these tests, the results found that both Insituform products far surpassed the design values. (See Table 1). SITUFORK - w MANUFACTURER'S “THC TEST : Flexural Strength .: ov Fram TG Technet Report 4302, Tab 42 PRODUCT. =... > VTEST =°—siws:s.. DESIGNYALUE == RESULTS ae ars METHOD _psl (MPa) nsl (MPa) ~~ Flexural Modulus. Standard. = -D790. «= 800,000.” 448,630.” (2070) 2 (8080) Enhanced “D790... 400,000. *.”. 538,620 « Standard DTD SHORT-TERM TEST RESULTS GREEP FACTOR Short-ferm buckling tests demonstrate that Creep factor reflects the reduction in buckling resistance of a plastic pipe over Insituform design is conservative in terms of time, typically 50 years. The creep factor, C,, Is the ratio of Experimental E, to both the enhancement factor, K, and the predicted the measured flexural modulus reported in Table 1 and represents the retention buckling pressures using the following ASTM of buckling resistance at 50 years {i.e., E, = C, E). A value of C, greater than F-1216 design model: the manufacturer's recommended value Is desirable. As shown in Table 2, ihe reported creep factor confirms the conservative nature of the 50% creep ps 2KE, e 1 ° C (1) reduction factor applied to flexural modulus in the Insituform product design. (FA) * (DR-T)" N rebte 2 able where, P = Buckling pressure, psi (MPa) Creep Factor K = Enhancement factor I ene E, = Long-term (time-corrected) modulus of elasticity, ps! (MPa) 11 = Polsson’s ratio DR= Dimension ratio (outside diameter divided by thickness) C = Ovality factor = 1 (for test program) N = Safety factor = 7 (for analysis of test data) LONG-TERM TEST RESULTS The enhancement factor, K, is a measure of the Regression analysis was used to extrapolate long-term buckling pressures restraining action of the host pipe that encases beyond the 10,000-hour test period to 50 years. (See Figure 3, next page). the Insituform product and greatly increases the allowable external buckling pressure. A Flexural Modu conservative enhancement factor of 7 Is Test results supported the flexural modulus reduced to account for typically recommended for design. The tests long-term effects, F,, used in the Insituform product design, by comparing measured the average enhancement factor, it to the experimentally derived apparent long-term flexural modulus for a K, of the Insituform Standard at 9.8 and the 50-year design lifé. The tested value greatly exceeded the conservative Insituform Enhanced product at 10.5. value used in the Insituform product design. (See Table 3). Table 3 Flexural Modulus (Long-term) “TTC Bmptimental E, Manutecturer . 0 2 pst (MPayo Recommended Design Os psi(MPa) - Insituform Standard: “269,990... 450,000, FBO) 1080) Insituform Enhanced - 393,965 200,000. From TTC Tehieal Report #202, Tale 4:8 a in as Boe es LONG-TERM BUCKLING BEHAVIOR It is important that the design procedures used for a rehabilitation product accurately predict . the long-term structural behavior of the product. The TIC data analysis compared the Jong-term buckling test data to that predicted by Equation 1. This comparison indicated that Equation 1 conser- vatively predicts long-term hydrostatic buckling behavior of both insituform products. Regression ia © TIMETO FAILURE, t (hour) (Report #802, Tale 6 Figure 3. Long-term Test and Regression flasulis for insituform Enhanced Product. AB1248 7/01 © 2001 tnsituform Technotogles, Inc. 50 - PLUS YEARS DESIGN LIFE One of the primary goals of the TTC test program - was to evaluate the design lives of various reha- bilitation products. This was accomplished by comparing the 50-year extrapolated test pressure to the design 50-year buckling pressure calculated using Equation 1 with manufacturer's recommended design values for E,. An Insituform design life in excess of 50 years was contirmed. WITHSTANDING THE TESTS OF TIME The most rigorous, innovative and Independent tests ever conducted on pipeline rehabilitation products clearly demonstrates that service life beyond 50 years can be expected with properly designed and Installed Insituform products. A copy of “Long-Term Structural Behavior of Pipeline Rehabilitation Systems” (TTC Technical Report #302) may be obtained by writing: Trenchless Technology Center Louisiana Tech University P.O. Box 10348 Ruston, Louisiana 71272 or by calling (318) 257-4072. © Insituform Technologies, Inc. Worldwide Pipeline Rehabilitation 702 Spirit 40 Park Drive Chesterfield, MO 63005 Toll Free: 800-234-2992 Phone: 636-530-8000 Fax: