READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Okaloosa County BOCC — February 11, 2013 — reading text
Part 31 of 38. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — 01-Agenda Packet.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
Attachment: 2013 Triennial Report Final (1603 : Acceptance of SHIP Triennial Report)
Code Table 4.05.03 provides density bonus points for projects that provide units for sale or rent that meet the criteria for
affordable or workforce housing. There is a possible 30 points available for developments that are providing affordable
housing.
Board Action: The Board’s 2010 inclusion of Section 2.19.00.4 as part of the Land Development Code is the requisite
Board action. City Council’s adoption of the Land Development Code in March 2012 implemented new density bonus
provisions that can encourage affordable housing development.
Recommendation: It is recommended that the City and County monitor the use and effectiveness of the density bonus
provisions described herein and, if necessary, work with the Affordable Housing Advisory Committee to further refine the
program to be more readily usable by the development community.
d. Incentive: The reservation of infrastructure capacity for housing for very-low-income persons, low-income persons, and
moderate income persons.
Review Synopsis: Okaloosa County currently does not reserve capacity for any development until such time as a
development order is issued. There is no proactive reservation of capacity for affordable housing or any other type of
development. The City of Fort Walton Beach also does not reserve capacity for any development until a development
order is issued. However, the City’s Comprehensive Plan contains Policy A.2.1 which states that the City will implement
the mix of uses on a district wide basis. This is to ensure that the City is not overbalanced with commercial, and that the
City will include housing when reviewing developments.
Board Action: As of this writing, neither the County Commission nor the City Council have established infrastructure
capacity reservations.
Recommendation: The Board of County Commissioners and City Council should research the legal considerations
associated with reserving infrastructure capacity and, if there are no legal impediments, should consider establishing
reservations of capacity for infrastructure for which Level-of-Service standards have been adopted.
e. Incentive: The allowance of affordable accessory residential units in residential zoning districts.
Packet Pg. 364
8.1.a.a
2013 AHAC Triennial Incentive Review and Recommendation Report Page 4 of 8
Review Synopsis: As part of the 2010 update, the County Land Development Code was amended to allow accessory
residential structures in all residential zoning districts. The City of Fort Walton Beach Land Development Code, adopted
Attachment: 2013 Triennial Report Final (1603 : Acceptance of SHIP Triennial Report)
in March 2012, now allows accessory dwellings in Residential Single-family Low Density Zoning Districts and Residential
Single-family Estate Zoning Districts.
Board Action: The amendment allowing accessory residential units as accessory structures is the required action. The
only remaining action is to monitor whether accessory units are being constructed and used as affordable housing.
Recommendation: The County and City should monitor the effectiveness of the allowance of accessory residential
structures in providing affordable housing.
f. Incentive: The reduction of parking and setback requirements for affordable housing.
Review Synopsis: In 2010, the parking requirements of the Okaloosa County Land Development Code were amended
to provide greater flexibility. Though the amendments were not specific or unique to affordable housing, the flexibility
should benefit affordable housing as well as any other use. While the County has not reduced its standard setback
requirements, development-specific setbacks may be established through the Planned Unit Development Process and
through the use of the residential design alternatives added to the Code in 2010 as discussed under g, below. The City’s
Comprehensive Plan (adopted in 2011) includes Policy C.5.6 which states that “the City will identify appropriate
alternative site design standards, such as parking ratios, setback standards, and zero lot line configurations, to encourage
additional affordable and workforce housing”, encouraging the City to continually monitor and improve development site
standards for affordable housing projects. In addition, the City’s Land Development Code Section 2.02.02 designates the
Downtown Design Overlay District (DDOD) which is established to preserve and promote the downtown area of Fort
Walton Beach. The intent of the DDOD is to provide flexibility in location and design requirements. This district is located
in the core of the City, which includes a mix of uses, including affordable housing. Setbacks, parking, and other
development standards are relaxed in this district. Therefore, although these reductions are not specific to affordable
housing, the changes still achieve the goal of reducing parking and setback requirements for affordable housing.
Board Action: This issue was addressed through the County’s 2010 update of its Land Development Code. No
additional action is needed at this time other than monitoring for effectiveness. The City of Fort Walton Beach will also
continue to monitor its policies and development standards to determine if affordable housing projects are having difficulty
complying with these existing standards.
Packet Pg. 365
8.1.a.a
2013 AHAC Triennial Incentive Review and Recommendation Report Page 5 of 8
Recommendation: The Board of County Commissioners should monitor the effectiveness of the flexible parking
requirements and alternative residential design standards to determine whether these recent revisions are having any
Attachment: 2013 Triennial Report Final (1603 : Acceptance of SHIP Triennial Report)
effect on the provision of affordable housing.
g. Incentive: The allowance of flexible lot configurations, including zero-lot-line configurations for affordable housing.
Review Synopsis: Chapter 2 of the County’s Land Development Code enables the creation of “Planned Unit
Developments” (PUDs) specifically to allow “flexible land use and design regulations and to permit planned diversification
and integration of uses and structures”, in order to, among other things, lower development and building costs. Reducing
building and development costs helps facilitate the construction of affordable housing. In addition, the 2010 amendments
to the County Land Development Code included Section 2.18.00 which provides for the use of zero-lot-line, zipper-lots, z-
and angled-lots, and cluster development as residential design alternatives in multiple zoning districts. The City of Fort
Walton Beach Land Development Code addresses several development alternatives to encourage affordable housing.
Section 4.07.04 of the Land Development Code states allows zero lot line development in the City to enable more efficient
and affordable single-family development. Furthermore, the City’s Comprehensive Plan includes Policy C.5.6, which is
stated above in section f. This policy will ensure that the City is continually seeking ways to facilitate affordable housing.
Board Action: As stated above, the Board of County Commissioners amended its Land Development Code to include
numerous design alternatives that could facilitate affordable housing projects. City Council adopted the Land
Development Code in 2012 which includes several flexible lot configurations that encourage affordable housing projects.
Recommendation: The County should monitor the use and effectiveness of these provisions for affordable housing.
h. Incentive: The modification of street requirements for affordable housing.
Review Synopsis: As part of the County’s 2010 amendments of its Land Development Code, the width requirements for
local streets as provided in the County’s Land Development Code were reduced from 66 feet to 50 feet for public roads,
and to 40 feet for private roads in an effort to reduce development costs. While not specific or unique to affordable
housing projects, these width reductions nonetheless provide the desired benefit for affordable housing. Policy 5.8 of the
City’s Comprehensive Plan states that the City will coordinate with the Affordable Housing Alliance Committee to consider
modifying current street requirements for affordable housing. The City is continually monitoring the need for flexibility in
this area.
Packet Pg. 366
8.1.a.a
2013 AHAC Triennial Incentive Review and Recommendation Report Page 6 of 8
Board Action: As stated above, the Board of County Commissioners has amended its Land Development Code to
reduce the mandatory width of both private and public roads. No action other than monitoring is recommended at his
Attachment: 2013 Triennial Report Final (1603 : Acceptance of SHIP Triennial Report)
time. The City of Fort Walton Beach will also continue to assess the needs of affordable housing projects in regards to
street requirements.
Recommendation: The Board of County Commissioners and City Council should monitor the effect the reduction has
on development, and in particular affordable housing.
i. Incentive: The establishment of a process by which a local government considers, before adoption, policies,
procedures, ordinances, regulations, or plan provisions that increase the cost of housing.
Review Synopsis: The County has not yet formally implemented this incentive. However, the effect of various
regulatory and policy changes on the affordability of housing is considered during the County’s deliberations of Land
Development Code amendments and other actions. The City’s Comprehensive Plan addresses this in Policy C.5.7, which
states that the City will consider the implications of adopting policies, procedures, ordinances, regulations, and plans
which may increase the cost of housing and report such information to the Municipal Planning Board (currently known as
the Local Planning Agency) as part of the deliberation process.
Board Action: The Board of County
