READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Fort Walton Beach Council agenda — 04-26-11 regular — reading text
Part 8 of 65. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — fwb-26904-original.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
1 -4
Current Funded Status - Current Liabilities
Current Funded Status
37,824, 943
40, 000, 000
30, 000, 000
20, 000, 000
10, 000, 000
Actuarial Value of Assets APV of Accumulated Plan Benefits
A comparison of current actuarial value of assets of the fund with the current actuarial
present value (APV) of benefits accrued based on credited service and salary to date is
commonly used to determine the Plan' s current funded status. This measurement is
often used as a surrogate for the liability if the Plan were to stop future benefit accruals.
It is called " current liability" since it is based only on current earned benefits, even
though the actual payment of those benefits extends many years into the future. The
accumulated benefit liability APVs were developed using the assumed rate of future
investment return of 7.9 %.
The current liability is normally expected to be more than 100% funded for an ongoing
plan since the plan will ultimately be liable for a greater accrued benefit ( the credited -
projected benefit).
The Plan' s 81% funded position for current liabilities has decreased somewhat since the
last valuation due to the unfavorable experience described earlier. If market value of
assets were used, the Plan' s funded percentage would be 79 %.
1 -5
Current Funded Status - Proiected Liabilities
Current Funded Status
39, 824, 706
40, 000, 000
34,351, 948
30, 000, 000
86%
20, 000, 000
Funded
10, 000, 000 -
0
Actuarial Value of Assets APV of Credited -Projected Benefits
A comparison of assets with the APV of benefits accrued based on credited service to
date, but projected salary at retirement ( referred to as credited -projected benefits), is
often used to judge the progress to date of funding the " ultimate" liability associated
with service earned to date. The credited -projected benefit liability APVs were
developed using an assumed rate of interest discount of 7.9 %.
The credited -projected benefit liability is not normally expected to be 100% funded, but
a maturing plan' s funded ratio should increase over time.
The Plan has a reasonably good funded ratio for projected liabilities at 86 %. If market
value of assets were compared, the Plan' s projected liability funded ratio would be 75 %.
1 -6
Funded Trend ( Projected Liability)
Funded Trend
39, 824, 706 O
38, 220, 065
a
33, 336, 278 P7,7,rrp= 34,351, 948 pTllllrA d
c
0
R
87% 86%
Funded Funded R
R
7
w+
V
a
0
2008 2009 2010
N
O
E3 APV of Credited -Projected Benefits O
Actuarial Value of Assets
dv
c
R
As shown above, the credited -projected benefit funded percentage has decreased aDV
a
somewhat since last year due to the unfavorable investment experience and changes in
actuarial assumptions.
rM
N
r
rr
N
OMO
Y
I. L
R
O
r
ON
RL
0
W
U.
E
v
rrR
a
1 -7
Valuation Trend
587
37.3E;0$ 38.413
30. 000
20. 000
7.522 $ 7.252 5. 076 $
6. 077
10. 000 + $
5. 324 3. 961 $
0. 000
Payroll Actuarial Present Value Actuarial Accrued Unfunded AAL
APV) of Future Liability (AAL) UAAL)
Benefits
Payroll has grown less than expected, due mostly to decreases in membership and
salary increases less than assumed. Projected liabilities ( APV of future benefits) also
grew less as expected. Unfunded liabilities ( UAAL) have increased due to investment
earnings less than assumed.
CQ _ O
Participation Trend
Distribution of Active Members by Age l
A )
nnR — wq — m n
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Under 25 25 -29 30 -34 35 -39 40 -44 45 -49 50 -54 55 -59 60 -64 65 & Over
True Costs
The true costs of a retirement plan cannot be determined until its future unfolds. No
one can precisely predict the interest earnings on fund assets, member termination
rates, future salary levels, mortality experience, etc. Estimates based on experience with
similar groups, along with the judgment of the actuary and the Plan sponsor, can
provide a reasonable approximation of this true cost. As actual experience emerges
under the Plan, it will be necessary to study the continued appropriateness of the
techniques and assumptions used and to adjust the contribution rate as necessary.
0
Con
2 -1
SECTION 2
ACTUARIAL VALUATION DEVELOPMENT
Date and Basis of Valuation
Estimated liabilities for the benefits provided by the City of Fort Walton Beach General
Employees' Retirement Fund and the contributions required to fund these liabilities
have been determined as of October 1, 2010, based upon:
1. the provisions of the Plan, as in effect on October 1, 2010, as summarized in
Appendix A;
2. the actuarial assumptions and actuarial cost method, as summarized in
Appendix B;
3. the statement of trust fund assets at October 1, 2010, provided by the City and
the Trustees, as summarized in Appendix C; and
4. the member data as of October 1, 2010, provided by the City, as summarized in
Appendix D.
The trust fund asset information has been supplied by the City and the Trustees. The
member data has been supplied by the City and provided as
