READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Fort Walton Beach Council agenda — 04-26-11 regular — reading text
Part 5 of 65. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — fwb-26904-original.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
Q
Q
tll01
Y
C_C
v
CL
d
Vv
Q
Nm
c
Page 8
City Council ofFort Walton Beach
City Council of Fort Walton Beach
POLICE
MEMORANDUM
To: Robert T. Mearns, City Manager
From: Ted Litschauer, Police Chief
Date: April 26, 2011
Subject: Authorization to Purchase Equipment
L BACKGROUND:
1. 1. The Fort Walton Beach Police Department ( FWBPD), as well as other law
enforcement agencies throughout the nation, utilize electronic devices commonly
known by their brand name: Taser.
1. 2. The police department has utilized this type of equipment for more than eight
years.
1. 2. 1. The police department' s initial purchase and issue consisted of twelve
Tasers. This permitted one to be assigned to one officer in each field work
unit.
1. 2. 2. Intentions were to supplement the initial issue, over a two or three year
period, until each sworn officer was issued one.
1. 2. 3. In the first few years thereafter, higher priority budget requirements
precluded purchasing additional Tasers.
1. 2. 4. During the last several budget cycles, the overall budget was decreased
and therefore, no additional Taser units were purchased.
1. 2. 5. Age has taken a toll on the initially issued Tasers and more than 50% of
Therefore,
the devices are currently unserviceable and non -repairable.
some work units have no Taser available at all.
2. DISCUSSION:
2. 1. The use of force is sometimes required to gain compliance when enforcing the
law, to protect the officer, or to protect others. When confronted with the need to
use force, police officers must select the appropriate level of force -- according to
the situation and legal parameters.
2. 1. 1. The level of force used by a police officer falls into a range which includes
voluntary compliance, voice command, open -hand tactics, closed -hand
and feet tactics, impact weapons, electronic weapons, less than lethal
munitions, and firearms /deadly force.
2. 1. 2. An officer, without a Taser, has only pepper spray and a baton -- as
intermediate weapons for gaining compliance or subduing a suspect --
between open -hand tactics and their firearm ( lethal force).
2. 1. 2. 1. Both pepper spray and the baton require close proximity -- within
arm' s length -in order to deploy. Therefore, when confronting a
criminal suspect or an individual threatening to harm him/herself,
these weapons are of no use if the subject is armed.
2. 1. 2. 2. With the Taser, the officer can maintain a safety zone distance of
up to 20 feet to deploy the non -lethal weapon.
From: Ted Litschauer, Police Chief
Date: April 26, 2011
Subject: Authorization to Purchase Equipment
2. 1. 2. 3. A Taser is often a vital tool when confronting suicidal persons.
2. 1. 3. Taser refresher training is a standard part of the annual training
curriculum.
2. 1. 3. 1 Each officer must be trained and certified before carrying a Taser.
2. 1. 3. 2. Nearly all Fort Walton Beach Police Officers, except those hired
within the past year, have already been Taser trained.
2. 1. 3. 3. FWBPD has a Taser certified instructor on our staff for training
purposes.
3. FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
3. 1. Due to position vacancies, sufficient funds are available to replace the
unserviceable units and to equip each officer with a Taser.
3. 2. A budget transfer from residual salaries budget within the police department, will
satisfy the required funding.
3. 3. The only recurring expenses, during the life of the Tasers, are the replacement of the
individual cartridges as they are expended.
3. 4. The estimated cost for the Tasers is $ 34, 296.
4. RECOMMENDATION:
4. 1. The Chief of Police recommends that the Council approve the purchase of forty
Tasers and initial charge cartridges to complete the equipment issue in the amount
of $34, 296 as a sole source purchase.
5. ATTACHMENTS:
5. 1. Price quotation from DGG Taser and Tactical Supply.
SIGNATURE BLOCK:
Ted Litschauer Completed 04/ 14/ 20114:41 PM
Finance Completed 04/ 18/ 2011 1: 49 PM
Carole Jones Completed 04/ 19/ 2011 11: 11 AM
City Manager Completed 04/ 19/ 20112: 05 PM
City Council Pending
h City Council of Fort Walton Beach
FINANCE
MEMORANDUM
To: Robert T. Meams, City Manager
From: Brandy Wunker, Finance Director
Date: April 26, 2011
Subject: Acceptance of 2010 Actuary Valuation Report
1. Background
1. 1. The City of Fort Walton Beach has three separate pension plans: the Police Officers'
Pension Plan, the Firefighters' Pension Plan, and the General Employees' Pension
Plan. The Police and Fire Pension Plan' s are administered separately by individual
Board of Trustees' as provided by Florida State Statutes. The City Council serves as
the Board of Trustees' for the General Employees' Pension Plan.
1. 2. The City has retained Actuarial Concepts since 1989 to prepare an annual valuation
report on the General Employees' Pension Plan. This 2010 Actuarial Valuation
presents a statement of the estimated financial position of the Plan as of October 1,
2010. The use of the actuarial valuation is for financial, budgetary, and/ or
administrative purposes.
1. 3. As of the valuation date, the General Employees' Pension Plan had approximately
154 active members, 135 retirees, 12 terminated vested members, and 36 members
pending refunds.
2. Discussion
2. 1. The market value of assets for the Plan increased by 7. 9 %, with plan assets totaling
29, 986, 598. The Plan experienced an actuarial loss of $1, 120, 000. An actuarial loss
or gain) is a measurement of the difference between actual experience and that
expected based upon the actuarial assumptions during the period between two
actuarial valuation dates.
2. 2. The following summarizes the Plan Actuaries' major conclusions:
2. 2. 1. Plan experience has been less favorable than expected, mostly due to smaller
investment returns than expected.
2. 2. 2. The net City contribution for the 2010 -2011 plan year is 20. 92% of payroll, or
approximately $ 1. 2M.
2. 2. 3. The net City contribution for the 2011 -2012 plan year is $ 1. 5M.
2. 2. 4. The City should be aware that current contribution requirements will increase
by about $ 250K over the next four years as prior gain amortizations are
completed and the payment toward amortizing $ 7. 6M in remaining unfunded
liabilities takes full effect. ( See page 3 - 3 for details).
2. 2. 5. The Plan' s funded status has deteriorated over the past year due to the
shortfall in investment returns and changes in actuarial assumptions.
2. 3. The following changes have been made to the actuarial assumptions:
Mz
City Council of Fort Walton Beach
FINANCE
MEMORANDUM
To: Robert T. Mearns, City Manager
From: Brandy Wunker, Finance Director
Date: April 26, 2011
Subject: Acceptance of 2010 Actuary Valuation Report
2. 3. 1. The investment return assumption has been lowered from 8% to 7. 9 %.
2. 3. 2. The assumed future rate of salary increase has been lowered, and salaries were
assumed not to increase for the next two fiscal years.
2. 3. 3. The payroll growth rate has been lowered to 3 %.
2. 3. 4. These assumptions will be reevaluated once responses to the Actuarial RFP,
which is pending issuance, have been received.
2. 4. A defined benefit pension plan's funding status is a common measure of the plan' s
health and is expressed as a percent. It illustrates the relationship between the
benefits promised and the assets needed to pay those benefits. The plans current
funded ratio is 86 %, down from 87% last year.
2. 5. The Actuary Valuation uses an asset smoothing method that dampens the otherwise
immediate effect of the investment losses that the Plan has experienced. These losses
will be recognized at 20% per year for the next 5 years. Actuarial yield for the Plan
was 4.21% vs. the assumed rate of 8 %. In consideration of the rising costs associated
with the Defined Benefit Pension Plan, the City began transitioning all new
employees, effective January 1, 2010, to a Defined Contribution Plan.
3. Financial Impact
3. 1. There is no financial impact related to the acceptance of this report.
4. Recommendation
4. 1. Staff requests City Council acceptance of the General Employees' Retirement Fund
Actuarial Valuation as of October 1, 2010 dated March 2011 ( attached).
ATTACHMENTS:
FWB General 2010 Val Rpt 030211 ( PDF)
SIGNATURE BLOCK:
Brandy Wunker Completed 04/
