READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Okaloosa County BOCC — April 5, 2016 — Letter of Engagement for IT Risk Assessment — reading text
Part 2 of 3. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Letter of Engagement for IT Risk Assessment — extracted reading text
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Known limitations
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
proprietary tools to identify vulnerabilities
residing in web applications. Unidentified web application vulnerabilities could lead to compromise of both web
servers and backend database servers which leads to the loss of confidential and\or proprietary information.
Vulnerabilities identified in the web application assessment include:
SQL Injection
Command Injection
Cross Site Scripting
Parameter Manipulation
Buffer Overflows
Broken Access Control
Broken Authentication and Session Management
Error Handling
Invalidated Parameters
Insecure Configuration Management
Our assessments are based on industry security standards and best practices including OWASP Web Application
Security Standards. Testing methodologies consist of the following three phases:
Information Gathering – The tester gathers information about the web application, including number of pages,
forms, user names and passwords and access points into the application.
Passive Application Logic Identification – The tester tries to understand the logic behind the application and
develop a method for further testing.
Active Vulnerability Identification – The tester uses a variety of testing methodologies to identify and validate
vulnerabilities found during previous testing.
A rules of engagement letter will be executed prior to initiating actual network penetration and web application
testing, authorizing this activity. The rules of engagement letter will define the specific time window and targets for
testing, and will provide notification and controls guidance specific to this testing.
Warren Averett Technology Group suggests testing web applications annually or after any network or software
changes that affect the application architecture. Our application testing team holds industry certifications relevant to
penetration and web application testing (i.e. Web Application Penetration Tester (WAPT), Certified Penetration Tester
(CPT), Certified Ethical Hacker (CEH) and Certified Information Systems Security Professional (CISSP)).
6
Warren Averett Technology Group Resource Center:
Toll‐free: 1‐888‐419‐9090 ▪ email: resource.center@watechgroup.com ▪ learn more: www.watechgroup.com
PROJECT SCOPE: DETAIL
Step 1. System Characterization
The first step in assessing the state of information technology and associated risk is to define the scope of the
effort. To do this, WATG will identify where mission critical data and PII (Personal Identifiable Information) is
created, received, maintained, processed, or transmitted. Using information‐gathering techniques, the IT system
boundaries are identified, as well as the resources and the information that constitute the system. Taken into
consideration will be functional priorities for systems and applications, organizational policies, regulations, the
distributed work force, and removable media and portable computing devices (e.g., laptops, tablets, smartphones,
removable media, and backup media).
WATG will examine the following network architecture with an emphasis on availability, proper controls, capacity,
and user access integrity.
a. Server Configuration and Network Devices – Review of wiring and switching infrastructure, routers, hubs,
wireless access points, etc. Check for capacity issues related to the existing data footprint versus projected
data growth, CPU, memory, server operating system, and hardware warranty.
b. Applications – E‐mail, database, web services, Anti‐Virus, and Anti‐Malware
c. Security Implementation – Firewall configuration, segmentation, access controls, content filtering, data
loss prevention, encryption, endpoint and mobile device management, logging and auditing.
d. Disaster Recovery/Business Continuity capabilities – Backups, recovery time objective and the number of
recovery points available. Off‐site backups.
e. Remote Access Setup – VPN, terminal server, Citrix, etc.
f. Printing Configurations – Shared, network printers, scanning
g. Environmental Conditions – Proper server room temperature and temperature monitoring and alerts.
Physical access to network hardware.
Output – Characterization of the IT system assessed, a good picture of the IT system environment and the most
critical assets, and delineation of system boundary.
Step 2. Threat Identification
For this step, potential threats (the potential for threat‐sources to successfully exercise a particular vulnerability)
are identified and documented. A threat‐source is any circumstance or event with the potential to cause harm to
an IT system (intentional or unintentional). Common threat‐sources can be natural, human, or environmental
(refer to the NIST SP 800.30 Threat Source List for examples). Tailor the list based on the individual organization
and its processing environment.
Output – A threat statement containing a list of threat‐sources that could exploit system vulnerabilities.
7
Warren Averett Technology Group Resource Center:
Toll‐free: 1‐888‐419‐9090 ▪ email: resource.center@watechgroup.com ▪ learn more: www.watechgroup.com
Step 3. Vulnerability Identification
The goal of this step is to develop a list of technical and non‐technical system vulnerabilities (flaws or weaknesses)
that could be exploited or triggered by the potential threat‐sources. Vulnerabilities can range from incomplete or
conflicting policies that govern an organization’s computer usage to insufficient safeguards to protect facilities
that house computer equipment, to any number of software, hardware, or other deficiencies that comprise an
organization’s computer network.
Output – A list of the system vulnerabilities (observations) that could be exercised by the potential threat‐sources.
Step 4. Control Analysis
The goal of this step is to document and assess the effectiveness of technical and non‐technical controls that have
been or will be implemented by the organization to minimize or eliminate the likelihood (or probability) of a
threat‐source exploiting a system vulnerability.
Output – List of current or planned controls (policies, procedures, training, technical mechanisms, etc.) used for
the IT system to mitigate the likelihood of a vulnerability being exercised and reduce the impact of such an adverse
event.
Step 5. Control Recommendations
The purpose of this step is to identify controls that could reduce or eliminate the identified risks, as appropriate
to the organization’s operations. The goal of these controls is to reduce the level of risk to the system and data
to an acceptable level. Factors to consider when developing controls may include effectiveness of recommended
options (i.e. system compatibility), legislation and regulation, organizational policy, operational impact, and safety
and reliability. Control recommendations provide input to the risk mitigation process, during which the
recommended procedural and technical security controls are evaluated, prioritized, and implemented.
Control recommendations for data security will be considered against technology improvements needed to
address obsolescence, improve operational efficiency and advance business continuity.
Output – Recommendation of control(s) and alternative solutions to mitigate risk and to advance information
systems processes and management.
Step 6. Results Documentation
Results of the General IT assessment are documented in an official report or briefing and provided to the County
Commissioners and management stakeholders to make decisions on policy, procedure, budget, and system
operational and management changes.
Output – A General IT assessment report that describes the state of the existing information systems technology,
its associated threats and vulnerabilities and provides a roadmap of recommendations for technology
improvements and controls implementation.
8
Warren Averett Technology Group Resource Center:
Toll‐free: 1‐888‐419‐9090 ▪ email: resource.center@watechgroup.com ▪ learn more: www.watechgroup.com
FEE SCHEDULE
Warren Averett Technology Group estimates that this project will involve several members of our team who each
work at a rate commensurate to experience and role. To ensure a successful project and an accurate estimate for
cost, we are pleased to present the expertise defined in the Scope of Services section for a fee of $48,500
The terms of this agreement shall commence upon the date of approval by both parties and will remain in effect until
completion of the project.
WARREN AVERETT TECHNOLOGY GROUP RESPONSIBILITES
In order to ensure a successful engagement throughout the term of this agreement, Warren Averett Technology
Group accepts the following responsibilities:
1. Furnish consultants possessing the skills necessary to perform the services described in this agreement.
2. While on company premises, we will respect and work under the management and direction of the point of
contact at the Okaloosa County Board of County Commissioners.
3. Provide services and schedule actions which may interrupt business production, whether remotely or onsite,
in accordance to the direction of management of the Okaloosa County Board of County Commissioners.
CLIENT RESPONSIBILITIES
In order to ensure a successful engagement throughout the term of this agreement, some responsibilities do exist
for Okaloosa County Board of County Commissioners’ management:
1. Management is responsible for decisions and functions, and for designating a competent employee to
oversee all information technology and consulting services provided by Warren Averett Technology Group.
2. Management is also responsible for evaluating the adequacy and results of the services performed and
accepting responsibility for such services.
3. It is understood and acknowledged that the management of Okaloosa County Board of County
Commissioners is responsible to establish and maintain a system of internal accounting controls. Warren
Averett Technology Group and its affiliates are not and cannot be responsible for the design, establishment
or maintenance of the company’s system of internal accounting controls.
4. Management of Okaloosa County Board of County Commissioners will provide Warren Averett Technology
Group personnel with access to company premises and will ensure a management representative is present
and available to Warren Averett Technology Group personnel while on company premises performing this
engagement.
9
Warren Averett Technology Group Resource Center:
Toll‐free: 1‐888‐419‐9090 ▪ email: resource.center@watechgroup.com ▪ learn more: www.watechgroup.com
PROJECT TEAM
JASON ASBURY
President and Member
Project Leader
D 334.260.2402 | F 334.274.1500 │ Montgomery, AL
Jason.Asbury@warrenaverett.com
Jason Asbury has fifteen years of experience working in
