READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Okaloosa County BOCC — November 16, 2013 — reading text
Part 5 of 38. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — 01-Agenda Packet.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
220323 $23,000
ROAD DEPT -
2003 FORD F250 3/4 TON CREW CAB in CTTF 188051 $28,000
1999 ALAMO 6640 BOOM AXE ROAD DEPT 5565 hrs $110,000
1994 JOHN DEERE 644G LOADER 170 HP 3YD ROAD DEPT 13984 hrs $195,000
2003 JOHN DEERE 724-J LOADER 205 HP 4.75 YD ROAD DEPT 10572 hrs $225,000
2000 KUBOTA M8200DTC TRACTOR 73 PTO HP ROAD DEPT 5955 hrs $40,000
2002 ALAMO ST 15 BATWING MOWER 15 PTO ROAD DEPT N/A $15,000
1991 LINKBELT CRANE ROAD DEPT 11473 hrs $ 600,000
CTTF $102,000
LOGT $1,531,000
Packet Pg. 27
Packet Pg. 28
Packet Pg. 29
Packet Pg. 30
TALKING PAPER ON 5-Cent vs. 3-Cent SECOND LOCAL OPTION GAS TAX
1. Each 1-cent of local option gas tax is projected to bring in $950,048 of new revenue for a 12-month
period. Based on a County/Cities split of 64%/36%, each 1-cent would provide $608,030 to the County. For
FY2014, the gas taxes would not be increased until Jan. 1, 2015, thus only 9-months of new revenue or
$456,023 per cent in FY2014. Projected new revenues to the County would be:
1-cent = $ 608,030/year FY2014 @ ¾ year = $ 456,023
2-cent = $1,216,060/year “ “ = $ 912,046
3-cent = $1,824,090/year “ “ = $1,368,069
4-cent = $2,432,120/year “ “ = $1,824,092
5-cent = $3,040,150/year “ “ = $2,280,115
2. In the recent past, the Board has had some discussion of forming a TIF (Tax Increment Funding) for a yet
to be defined area of north Okaloosa County. It would probably take a period of 6 to 10 years for the TIF to
accumulate an appreciable level of revenues to apply to road projects or to apply to bonding/borrowing for
road projects. One method to move this program forward almost immediately is to use a portion of the
proposed increase in optional gas taxes to pledge as support for either bonding or a bank loan.
3. Using figures provided by the County’s Bond Counsel, Mr. Mark Galvin, in May 2013, the chart below
shows a few examples of annual debt service and bonding/borrowing (project amounts) that could be done
beginning January 2013:
Debt Service 15-year Bank Loan 15-yr Payment Total 20-year Bond 20-yr Payment Total
A. $1,750,000 $19,945,000 $26,250,000 $21,516,000 $35,000,000
B. $1,250,000 $14,300,000 $18,750,000 $15,500,000 $25,000,000
C. $1,000,000 $11,410,000 $15,000,000 $12,322,000 $20,000,000
Line A would require using 96% of 3-cents of gas tax for debt service.
Line B would require using 2-cents of gas tax for debt service.
Line C would require using 82% of 2-cents of gas tax for debt service.
In all cases shown above, the most economical options are a 15-year bank loan when considering interest
and loan/bond costs.
4. Through bonding or borrowing, amounts of $11 Million or more, the Road Dept. would be able to move a
number of badly needed projects forward and get them done in the short-term rather than using a “cash-
accrual” basis. Any borrowing funds from the gas tax can be used throughout the County for road projects.
Funding received via a TIF could only be spent on projects within the TIF boundaries. However, the
combination of using gas taxes for debt service combined with a future TIF can be a powerful leveraging
factor.
5. If the Board opts to only go for a 3-cent gas tax, most (all?) of the first year proceeds will be used to
purchase the critically needed equipment and vehicles that our Road Dept. needs to do the work we expect
Packet Pg. 31
of them. By doing a 5-cent gas tax, the Road Dept. will be able to replace their worn-out critical equipment
and still have a flow of funds to do multiple projects via debt service.
6. Other Considerations:
A. Gas taxes are the most appropriate method to pay for road projects. It can be considered a “user
fee”: those who buy the most gas usually put more miles on the roads. Whereas property taxes are paid
only by property owners.
B. Conservative estimates show that 35-40% of gasoline sales are paid by tourists, other visitors, or
those just passing through.
C. As vehicles generally are getting more efficient gas mileage, they put more road-use miles per
gallon.
D. The “2nd Optional Gas Taxes” do not apply to diesel fuel, thus not negatively impacting the trucking
industry with diesel trucks or heavy equipment using diesel engines (or diesel boats).
E. Heaven knows Okaloosa County has millions of dollars of backlogged work that needs to be done to
improve and maintain our County roads and road-related stormwater projects.
Dave Parisot
Commissioner, Dist. 2
Packet Pg. 32
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
AGENDA REQUEST
DATE: September 3, 2013
TO: Honorable Chairman and Members of the Board
FROM: Daniel O'Byrne
SUBJECT: Public Hearing - Beach Restoration MSBU Final Assessment Resolution
DEPARTMENT: Tourist Development Department
BCC DISTRICT: ALL
STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Pursuant to the ordinance creating the Municipal Service Benefit
Unit for Beach Restoration, an initial assessment resolution was adopted on August 6, 2013. The
Initial Assessment Resolution established the proposed rates for the assessment, directed that
notice be given for a public hearing to consider adopting a Final Assessment Resolution, and
scheduled such a hearing. The purpose of this Final Assessment Resolution is to adopt the final
assessment rates, confirm the method of apportionment established in the initial assessment
resolution, certify the assessment roll, and re-impose the assessment for the Fiscal Year 2013-
2014.
A public hearing on the Final Assessment Resolution has been scheduled for September 3, 2013
and will take place in Crestview. In order to facilitate public participation from residents who
may be unable to attend the September 3rd hearing, the County scheduled a public hearing on
August 20, 2013 in Fort Walton Beach to allow public comments on the Final Assessment
Resolution. However, no formal action was taken.
BACKGROUND: On December 4, 2007, the County adopted Ordinance 07-71 which created
the Okaloosa County Beach Restoration Municipal Services Benefit Unit (MSBU). The purpose
of the MSBU is to facilitate the imposition of special assessments to partially fund the Beach
Restoration Project within the Destin Sub-Assessment Area of the MSBU. As a result of prior
action of the Board, the assessment within the Okaloosa Island Subarea has been eliminated and
refunds paid. Therefore, this assessment will only be within the Destin Subarea. Further, the
property of Oceania Condominium was previously excluded from the Destin Project in 2010 and
therefore they have been excluded from the assessments since that time and refunds paid.
On August 6, 2013, the Board adopted the Initial Assessment Resolution, which set the
preliminary assessment rates, outlined the apportionment method, set the September 3rd public
hearing and provided for the required statutory notice. Pursuant to Ordinance 07-71, the Board
is required to confirm or repeal the Initial Assessment Resolution, with such amendments the
Board deems appropriate, after hearing comments and objections of all interested parties at the
September 3, 2013 public hearing to be held in Crestview.
RECOMMENDATIONS: Accept public comments on the final assessment resolution for the
Okaloosa County Beach Restoration Project Municipal Service Benefit Unit for the assessment
imposed for Fiscal Year 2013-2014 and approve the final assessment resolution.
Packet Pg. 33
RECOMMENDED BY:
APPROVED BY:
Ernie Padgett, County Administrator
Packet Pg. 34
______________________________________________________________________
OKALOOSA COUNTY, FLORIDA
_____________________________________________
FINAL ASSESSMENT RESOLUTION
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013-2014
FOR THE
OKALOOSA COUNTY BEACH RESTORATION PROJECT
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BENEFIT UNIT
_____________________________________________
ADOPTED ____________________
______________________________________________________________________
Packet Pg. 35
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
SECTION 1. AUTHORITY ..................................................................................2
SECTION 2. DEFINITIONS................................................................................3
SECTION 3. CONFIRMATION OF ASSESSMENTS ....................................3
SECTION 4. APPROVAL OF ASSESSMENT ROLL.....................................3
SECTION 5. IMPOSITION OF ASSESSMENTS TO FUND THE
BEACH RESTORATION .............................................................3
SECTION 6. ASSESSMENT LIENS .................................................................4
SECTION 7. COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS..........................................4
SECTION 8. EFFECT OF RESOLUTION........................................................5
SECTION 9. ASSESSMENT NOTICE..............................................................5
SECTION 10. SEVERABILITY.............................................................................5
SECTION 11. EFFECTIVE DATE .......................................................................5
APPENDICES:
APPENDIX A: PROOF OF PUBLICATION
APPENDIX B: ASSESSMENT ROLL
APPENDIX C: FORM OF CERTIFICATE TO NON-AD
VALOREM ASSESSMENT ROLL
i
Packet Pg. 36
RESOLUTION 13-__________
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF OKALOOSA COUNTY,
FLORIDA, RELATING TO THE CONSTRUCTION
AND FUNDING OF BEACH RESTORATION WITHIN
THE DESTIN SUB-ASSESSMENT AREA OF THE
BEACH RESTORATION MUNICIPAL SERVICE
BENEFIT UNIT; PROVIDING RECITALS,
AUTHORITY AND DEFINITIONS; CONFIRMING
THE ASSESSMENTS; APPROVING THE
ASSESSMENT ROLL; PROVIDING FOR
COLLECTION OF THE ASSESSMENTS
PURSUANT TO THE UNIFORM ASSESSMENT
COLLECTION ACT; PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECT
OF THIS RESOLUTION; PROVIDING
SEVERABILITY AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Okaloosa County,
Florida (the “County”) adopted Ordinance 07-71
