Okaloosa County BOCC — October 7, 2014 — FOY SHAW SCOPE OF SERVICES_PHASE I EA — reading text

alternative. The cost estimate is to be developed using the FDOT’s Long Range Estimating (LRE) program. Comparative Analysis of Alternatives The COUNTY will determine which viable alternative(s) to further evaluate through the public involvement process and environmental analysis. The following items as well as their direct, indirect and cumulative effects and their significance will be addressed as part of the documentation. 3.11 Comparative Analysis and Evaluation Matrix After developing the viable alternatives and costs, the CONSULTANT will prepare a matrix comparing the impacts and costs of the alternatives evaluated, with a recommendation of the most viable alternative(s). The CONSULTANT shall present their recommendations to the COUNTY for consideration. These recommendations will be presented in the form of a Preliminary Engineering Report (PER). 3.12 Aviation Analysis and Evaluation The CONSULTANT shall review each design alternative to evaluate if the alternative is in general conformance with the approved Airport Layout Plan (ALP) for Bob Sikes Airport (CEW) and the Federal Aviation Authority (FAA) Advisory Circular (AC) 150/5300-13A Airport Design. CONSULTANT will provide a summary report for each alternative which highlights any potential impacts to the existing RW 17-35 threshold or Runway Protection Zone (RPZ). CONSULTANT will attend meetings as required with representatives from CEW and FAA to discuss potential impacts. 3.13 Selection of Preferred Alternative The CONSULTANT shall recommend a preferred alternative(s) based on a review and analysis of all engineering, environmental, and public involvement issues related to the project. 3.14 Conceptual Design Plans The CONSULTANT will prepare alternative concept plans. At a minimum, the concept plans should include the proposed and existing right-of-way lines, proposed concepts for roadway and intersection improvements, potential ponds and surrounding topography. Major intersections shall be analyzed to assess capacity needs and land arrangements and to identify right-of-way requirements. Once a preferred alternative has been selected, the CONSULTANT will finalize concept plans for the preferred alternative that include refinements from the public hearing. Task 4: Miscellaneous Services 4.1. Contract and Project Files Project Management efforts for complete setup and maintenance, developing monthly progress reports, schedule updates, work effort to develop and execute sub-consultant agreements etc. Progress reports shall be delivered to the COUNTY in a format as prescribed by the COUNTY and no less than 14 days prior to submission of the corresponding invoice. Judgment on whether work of sufficient quality and quantity has been accomplished will be made by the Project Manager by comparing the reported percent complete against actual work accomplished. Within ten (10) days after the Notice to Proceed, the CONSULTANT shall provide a schedule of calendar deadlines accompanied by an anticipated payout curve. Said  schedule and anticipated payout curve shall be prepared in a format prescribed by the COUNTY. 4.2. Project Management Meetings And Coordination The CONSULTANT shall meet with the COUNTY as needed throughout the life of the project. It is anticipated six (6) meetings will be needed. These meetings will include progress and miscellaneous review and other coordination activities with the COUNTY. 4.3. Additional Services Design Services – See Exhibit A2