READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Fort Walton Beach Council agenda — 03-14-06 (regular) — reading text
Part 34 of 40. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — fwb-10149-original.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
accommodate those living
on the Island. Efforts were made to meet the needs of the
community by elevating the
roadway, so that Island residents would be able to travel on Santa Rosa Blvd. and
experience no additional traffic at all.If there was to be a toll, they would have a toll free
route on and off the island via the existing Brooks Bridge. After seeing the
reoccuning
washouts of Hwy 98, caused by the past few storms I also requested that Figg Engineers
consider extending the skyway from the orgin point of the Hurlburt crossing all the way
to Desti~ above Hwy 98 so that a truly regional problem, would be better addressed, the
skyway could then be taken over and through Destin,creating an almost county wide
through corridor, that would handle the capacities and demands placed on it,for the next
twenty to thirty years, if not longer.
Then we came to the second Emerald Coast Bridge Authority charrette 2, which by this
time was being called a " charade". I attended this work shop as well. Let me say that it
was a disappointment from the very first fifteen minutes, declining in answers provided,
and escalating both, frustrations and tempers, of all that attended, throughout the rest of
the day. From the onset of the meeting in the morning, where I asked the first question of
Linda Figg,after she unveiled the " Three corridors most voted for." " Are these the only
options your company is giving us to work with?" Things proceeded to deteriorate at a
snow balling rate. Yes, those three con- idors were all that was given consideration. Out of
those three, options for two types of landings for each conidor. The Wright Pkwy. option
that my group, as well as others, presented to the first charette, that had made it to the
final cut,bore little or no resemblance to what Figg Engineers came out with.
Gone was the Hurlburt bridge and now instead of creating an East to West corridor, a
major road now plowed through schools and neighborhoods, going north to south. Taking
no logical approach into account,of where the traffic we were trying to route through the
city, was being routed too! Nothing has been said of the B. R.A.C. commission either,
behold the golden goose has laid a golden egg. That translates into what will soon be
fifteen to twenty thousand new people coming to our homes, schools, and yes our roads.
If that is not incentive enough for the Air Force to take some responsibility, I don' t know
what is. Yielding the right of way on the island reservation would be a good start. Taking
a serious look at what this plan could do to enhance the mission of Hulbrurt would be a
good second. Remember the original plan called for a pass to provide access to the Gulf
and widen the tax base to help earn tax revenue to pay for the project. It would greatly
enhance quality of life in both Ft.Walton and the Island. Sound side would have
wonderfully clean clear emerald waters.
By the end of the day the atmosphere was thick enough to cut with a knife. If you are
unaware of the sentiments of the people in attendance, let me tell you that over one third
of all that attended gave ones ( on a scale of one to ten ) to every plan as it was presented
2
by Figg. The key words are " as presented by Figg." These are the same people that gave
their vote to the corridors at the first charette. By the end of the day virtually everyone in
the room was so utterly disgusted, that when Ms.Figg refused to answer a direct question
from me, just stood at the podium and looked straight ahead. I could bear no more, I
turned to the room and asked that everyone in favor of telling Figg to go back and redraw
these plans, that we approve of nothing you have shown us, or said, stand up. Eighty per
cent of the people in room stood up, including the mayor and several city council
members. " Is that a loud enough message to you Linda?', to which she had no reply. I
was one of the people that placed my green dot on the " No" placard, not because I was
against a bridge, but because I could not in good conscious choose any of Figg' s designs.
I packed up and left.
The following week, with speed that would rival a bullet, a special meeting was called by
the city council. At that meeting, a vote was taken and passed that the city would not
endorse any of the three corridors currently under consideration. This was to be signed by
all council members, and to be delivered to the E. C. B.A. by the mayor himself. That
done, there were three people in the room that wanted alternatives also delivered to the
Authority. Jim Tucker was one, the council voted to not hear any motions, packed up
went home.
Now we come to " The Emerald Coast Bridge Authority Planning Alternative Meeting."
By definition you would think that this is a meeting to hear alternative plans that
individuals, like myself and others, have designed, hence the name " Planning
Alternatives." Nope! Wrong again. Instead of hearing alternatives, we are fed falsified
numbers by Figg Engineering that show that, even after you remove one- third of the
votes that people gave at the second charette, you still don' t get an approval rating that
comes close to showing a positive response by or for, any of Figg' s designs. And still
they press on. Is it any wonder that at this point tempers are so hot,that extra deputies are
in attendance? After the board conducts business, the ftrSt to speak is our mayor. After
reading the letter to the board, he was very politely asked by the Chairman of the
authority, Mr. Tom Rice, " If indeed you do not like any of the proposed bridge corridors,
may we please know what you do suggest we do. Do you have an alternative route for us
to consider?" DUH! You might have anticipated, this to be, the ftrSt question
ask~ by someone that has spent the last four years working his but off, to solve our
areas traffic problems. The some what befuddled mayor had no answer what so ever,
other than to say ," 1 really don' t think we need a bridge", this is a forward thinking
elected official. Right. What followed next,was a parade of over fifty people saying
negative things about bridges, punctuated by six that said we have got to do something,
two had plans, but were not allowed time to explain them. End of meeting, everyone
leaves disgruntled and frustrated. By the way, at this point,Figg and their associates have
taken home near $ 300, 000.00.
The date we all have been waiting for, the E. C. B.A. will pick a corridor in which to build
abridge; of a design that no one wants, and put in a place no one wants. Today' s front
Bridge Authority dodges bullet"..... You may have dodged a bullet but you' re
page. . .. ~~
3
not dodging this howitzer shell. All that happened was that Dale Peterson made and the
authority passed a motion that the " Wright Corridor be eliminated from consideration and
that the sister bridge and Hollywood Corridors be sent to the Northwest Florida Corridor
Commission, to see how they fit into the overall plan. Let me save you the trouble and
expense of doing that and tell you this; Nothing is gained for our community by either of
these " Solutions," they are anything but solutions. By forwarding either of these
grotesque corridors, you are preparing to destroy the entire city center. The long term
damage will, and there is no doubt about this, be irreversible.
Like so many in this community I am imploring you to rethink, reevaluate, and tell Figg
Engineering, that this is not acceptable. I am asking every person that will read this to
respond, in any way you can. If my own proposal is what you think is the best on the
table, then get off of your butt and onto your computer. E- mail meatDutch500@cox. net
and put it in writing so I can carry it to the bridge authority for you. If you think you have
a better solution send that too. Whatever you do, don' t be silent. Make your voice heard.
Send direct E- mail to the Bridge authority, to date they have received 196 total, and most
were negative. We are coming down to the wire and it is Gametime folks. Be heard,
sound off.
Most sincerely,
Dutch Petro
4
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
March 14, 2006
Regular Agenda
Consideration of Mayor' s appointment to the Fort
Walton Beach Housing Authority
City Clerk)
Council Action
1st
2nd
Vote:
Agenda Item Number: RG - 14
CITY OF FORT WALTON BEACH
MEMORANDUM
TO: Joyce Shanahan, City MtliI. ur/
FROM: Helen Spencer, City
clerK(!rl
DATE: March 6, 2006
SUBJECT: Housing Authority Appointment
BACKGROUND:
Pat Thornber, 342 Holmes Blvd. NW, Fort Walton Beach, has been a member of the Fort
Walton Beach Housing Authoritysince March, 1986. Her current tenn ended on
February 25, 2006. Mrs. Thornber has been contacted and will serve another four- year
tenn if reappointed by the Mayor and approved by Council.
The Housing Authority acts to provide safe, sanitary and decent housing for low income
families at affordable rent. Membership on the Housing Authority Board is not limited
to city residents, and there are no term limits.
DISCUSSION:
In accordance with F. S. 421 05 (1) (attached), the Mayor has authority to appoint with the
approval of Council.
INCUMBENT: PAT THORNBER, 342 HOLMES BLVD.
APPLICANTS: NONE
CONCLUSION:
Recommend the Mayor appoint, and Council approve, a citizen to serve on the Housing
Authority Board for a four-vear term until March 13. 2010.
S/ lve
Reviewed and Concurred: ~
Hold for Discussion:
Denied:
8~ g,&>-
anag~ Date
Comments:
u-ILl
t-.-.
PUBUC HOUSING Ch.421
used In connection wIth a housing project, or of the commIssIoners who are first appointed shall be
Ignee or assignees of such lessor's Interest or designated to serve for tenns of 1, 2, ancf ,3 years
lrt thereof, and the Federal Government when respectively; the remaining commissioners shall be
Is a arty to any' contract with the authority.. . designated to serve for terms 0f 4 years each, from the
I, d1. 17911. COL 19<40
1937j 30 Supp. 7100(
- ): .. 1. cII. 202 9.
HlI' .- t.
date of their appolntmenL Thereafter, each commls-
1~~ i t. 0 dr. 28051. 1953: .. 24, d1.57. 1; .. 1. cII. ISN&a.
