READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE

Fort Walton Beach Council agenda — 03-14-06 ‎(regular)‎ — reading text

Part 13 of 40. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.

Machine-extracted text — fwb-10149-original.pdf

Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed

Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.

district unrelated to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. Same as # 1, above. 4 3. Existing zoning boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. . Existing zoning boundaries are not drawn consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map. The proposed change implements the Future Land Use IIap FLUM]designation NfUCC Mixed Use Community Commercial. The request Is considered appropriate and consistent wlfh fhe Comprehensive Plan. 4. Changing or changed conditions make the proposed zoning appropriate. Tbe following events have occuned since 2<< 10 when fhe Future Land Use Map FLUM) was adopted: 1) the FLUM caned for substanflal changes in the area along Hollywood Boulevard SE and SW as weB as Seal Parlcwayfrom C, Commercial (now called General Commercial)to MUCC (1KlX. ed Use Community Commen:ial). All C-1 and C-2 aR!aS along Hollywood and Seal Padcway weB to be de- Intensified commerciaHyto anow residential and commercial mixed uses (not allow auto repair,auto sales,etc. uses);2) business and property 0WIJe1S objected to the re- cfassNlcation when the City began to implement the zoning chang,. requiJed from C- 1fC.2 10 MUCC- 1/AJUCC- 2 and City Council denied tbe zoning changes; and 3} Staffinftiated a change to the FLUM to General Commercial in 2tJ03. The teSult is that C- 1 and C- 2 zoned areas and Land Uses are called out for the Hollywood Boulevard corridor rather than the Mixed Use Community CommerciaL Therefore a change in intensity of land use to mixed-use makes more sense. City Council agreed and chang.ed the FLUM to MUCC in July 2005. 5. The proposed change Will adversely influence tivtng conditions in the neighborhood. Any adverse conditions that may have been created by the development of the commercially zoned property along the Hollywood Corridor should be amerlOrated by the MUCC-2 zoning proposed by the request. See ( Zoning Map-Exhibit B). 6. The proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or otherwise effect public safety. The request site will be accessed from Parle Circle SE a local street 7. The proposed change will create a drainage problem. There are no known soil types in the area that might create dminage problems on the site.Any development on the site will require a stormwater plan per LDC regulations. The intensity of deve/ t and percentage of impervious surface opm., will be limited to 75 per cent of the site. 8. The proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. The bulle development standards for the AfUCc-Z District are less restrictive than the comparable R-2 District (see table below)fo accommodate a mix of commercial and teSidential use. Heights Wl11 continue to be limited to 45 feet Table 1 Comparison of R-2 versus MUCC District Standards Standards R-2 Existing) ( MUCC- 2 (Pr~ 5 Den 1Acre} 15 12 sity tnk.. 11e.q, 11t 45 feet 45 feet FAR None 2.25 Land- 5{) 0~ 75% . Minimum lot size Commen:iaI use Area NA None Wid1b NA sa Single family dwelling Afea 6,000 sf NA Wid8t 60t NA Two-famiIy dwelling AJea 7,000 sf NA W'HUb 10t NA 3+ DweHings Area None 7,aDO sf WidIII None SOt TOWRhoInes Area 1, 400 sf 3.630 sf Width, 1St 18' Minimum'yfitrds Front 25' 25 feet Side comer 25' 25 feet Side 1. S' 7.s feet Rear 20' 20 feet PerfoJmance standardS . . 2 abuts R- . Where R;.; Requires buffer 1a district 1 or R;. between commerciat boundaries side and residential setback is 1St wi property 1am:fscape buffer 6 feet high Sofid waste diSposal fadJitiesshall be screened 9. The proposed change wilf adversely affect property values in the adjacent areas. staff does not anticipate anyadvetSe affect on property values from the proposed to the west of change as there is a ftansitionallflUCC land use designllfion in place the request. 10. The proposed zoning change win be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. The rezoning should stimulate re- devefopmenf of adjacent developed siteS as well as the request site.The existing R-NC zoning is inappropriate and being phased out City-wiclf!. 11. The proposed zoning district win constitute a grant of speciar privilege to individual owners as contrasted to the public welfare. 6 The requested change in zoning does not represent a grant of special privilege.As previously mentione4 applicant is talcing action which will implement a change in the FLUNI, that the City would otherwise have to accomplish. 12. There are substantial reasons why a reasonable use of the property can not be accompfished under the existing zoning. This property ;s su" ounded to the notfh~east and west by lands designated General CommerciaL Continued use as residential wiR create {and use contJicts with those mote intense lands.This land has designated for commercial use from since the Year 2000. 13. Whether the zoning proposed is out of scare with the needs of the neighborhood or the City. The proposed zoning change to MUCC-2 implements the Comprehensive Plan FLUM designation for the request site. F. SUMMARY The proposed change win implement the FLUM designation Mixed Use Community Commercial by changing the zoning to a district considered consistent with that designation, MUCC-2 Mixed Use Community Commerciat-2 District Attachments: Applicant'sExhibits-Exhibit 1- Application Exhibit 2- Proof of Ownership City's Exhibits Exhibit A- Location Map Exhibit B-Zoning Map Exhibit C- FLUM Exhibit D~ Existing Land Use Map 7 1:IR,11:ffir~:::: I:I:I:' I\: :' i'::I': CITY OF FORTWAL TON BEACH DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES APPLICATION FOR REZONING Project Name: Rezoning request of Lots 9, lO~ 11 Block 4 Rowa:t:d W. Gill Subdivision Address or General Lo~ tion: 6 Park Circle, -S. E. Ft. Walton Beach, FL PART ONE- APPU.CANT INFORMATION APPLICANT Name: Kinetic Builders, . Inc., Paul Kieszek, President 6 Park Circle., .S. E., Ft. Walton Beach, Address: FL AGENT Name: . James R. Dowling, AlA lIt"Fer.ry Road S. E. Add ress: Ft. Walton Beach. FL OWNER (if oth~ r than acclicant) Name: Same Address: Telephone Number: 850- 244- 0931 EXHIBIT- 1 PART TWO- PROPERTY INFORMATION Tax Parcel Number: Lot, 9 Blk 4 Howard Gill SiD ProDertv In!! 13252412?() Oon40090 Legal Description ( attach separate sheet if necessary): Lot 10. Elk 4 Howard Gill SiD Properry Tnn1i?~? 41?? 1~ OO()()&~ n R RO fr nf T, nt 11 r ' R1 k rn 4 R~'tJ:=!. Gi 11 ~ In Prnperty Tn# 11? ~ O()4n'11 A 24122()() W 50 of Lot 11, Blk 4 ( As or 1075- 617) ft.. Also the W 20 ft. o'f ,E 100ft. of, Lo,t Property IDfl132524122P0004011B Existing District: R-~" 2 Proposed Zoning District MUCC- 2 ExistIng

Download this text file with its original spacing ↓