READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Okaloosa County BOCC — October 15, 2013 — E - Request Letter & Supplemental Documentation for BWB DRI DO Amendment (1 of 3) — reading text
Part 2 of 2. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — 24-E - Request Letter _ Supplemental Documentation for BWB DRI DO Amendment _1 of 3_.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
tract property lines. The tower does not emit noise, glare, odor, or pollution. It
does not require a loading area, parking area or outdoor storage.
Policy 4.4 Compatibility of adjacent zoning districts shall be considered during rezoning
and land use plan amendments, considering potential maximum densities, intensities, and
consistency of the potential land uses with surrounding districts, and the manner in which
the land uses on the FLUM and the zoning districts result in an appropriate transition of
uses, densities, and intensities (also see Policy 10.13).
Consistency: — X YES NO N/A
Analysis:
The parent tract is zoned MU-1 with a FLU of MU-1 and is surrounded by mixed,
recreational, and residential uses. The construction of the replacement tower will not
increase residential units in the area or commercial square feet with in the DRI. The tower
is proposed on a parcel with a non-residential use, recreation, and mild commercial uses,
boat storage.
Policy 4.5 Compatibility of redeveloped sites and structures with the surrounding
neighborhood shall be achieved through the following measures:
a. ensuring that residential development reflects the predominant housing type in the
surrounding neighborhood to the maximum extent possible;
b. recognizing that the redevelopment of an existing building may make it infeasible
to adhere to current standards for building heights, scale, mass, setbacks, and
orientation, the project shall nevertheless ensure that the development recognizes
the predominant features of the surrounding neighborhood to the maximum extent
possible;
c. maintaining the established lot development pattern of the surrounding
neighborhood through requirements that address land assembly, lot arrangement,
lot area, lot dimensions, and lot configuration;
d. ensuring that proposed conversions of residential structures to an allowable non-
residential use are consistent with the established or planned character of the
neighborhood, and do not introduce instability into the neighborhood; and
e. ensuring that techniques identified in Policy 4.3 are incorporated into the site
design during redevelopment to the maximum extent feasible.
Consistency: YES NO _ xX NA
Analysis:
The tower is new construction and not redevelopment.
Policy 4.6 Non-conforming uses and non-conforming structures shall be prohibited from
expansion, except as may be essential and necessary to protect the public health, safety,
and welfare. Land development regulations of the County shall continue to contain
standards and procedures to ensure the limitations on expansion of both non-conforming
uses and non-conforming structures.
Consistency: _ YES , NO X NA
Analysis:
Objective 5 Historic and archaeological resources/districts of Okaloosa County, where
designated, shall be protected through identification, classification, and regulation of
development.
Policy 5.2 The County shall require the cessation of land disturbing activities any time
artifacts with potential historical or archaeological significance are revealed and shall
require that the property owner notify the discovery of the artifacts to the Department of
State, Division of Historical Resources.
Consistency: x YES NO N/A
Analysis:
As a part of review for FCC approval, Crown shall apply for NEPA review which includes
items of archaeological significance.
Objective 6 Natural resources, environmental lands, and coastal resources shall be protected
through identification, classification, planning and management, and limitations on use
consistent with the degree of protection required. Also refer to Conservation Objective 3 and
related policies, Conservation Objective 5 and related Policies, and Coastal Management
Objective 1.2 and related policies.
Policy 6.1 Public supply wellhead protection areas shall be protected from adverse
impact through implementation of Conservation Policies 2.3 and 2.5.
Consistency: YES NO x N/A
Analysis:
The tower shall not impact public supply wellhead protection areas.
Policy 6.2 Environmentally sensitive lands, as defined in Conservation Policy 3.5, shall
be protected through the process of development, redevelopment, land use plan
amendments, and changes in zoning. Protection shall be provided by such techniques as
limitations on density and intensity, clustering of allowable development on non-sensitive
portions of a site, requirements for buffers to mitigate or eliminate impacts to
environmentally sensitive areas, and site design techniques that are consistent with the
environmentally sensitive areas. Determination of degree of protection required and the
imposition of requirements to accomplish protection shall be part of the application and
review process and may result in conditions on development approvals.
Consistency: X__ YES NO N/A
Analysis:
The tower shall impact environmentally sensitive lands. As part of its FCC review, an
environmental review and report shall be generated as it relates to flora and fauna.
Policy 6.3 The protection of environmentally sensitive lands, as defined in Conservation
Policy 3.5, shall be accomplished by one or more of the following techniques, based on
the degree of protection required:
a. limitations on development density and intensity;
b. limitations on building placement, such as required clustering on the non-
sensitive portions of the site;
c. limitations on building coverage or impervious surface coverage;
d. setbacks and landscaped buffers sufficient to provide protection to the
resource; and
e. evaluation of proposed plan amendments to ensure that they do not contribute
to urban sprawl that fails to protect natural resources.
Consistency: _ X YES NO N/A
Analysis:
The tower shall not impact environmentally sensitive lands. As part of its FCC review, an
environmental review and report shall be generated as it relates to flora and fauna. While
wetlands exist on the parent tract, Crown located the tower to avoid impacting the
wetlands.
Policy 6.4 In addition to protective measures in Policy 6.3, wetlands shall be protected by
the following:
a. For both tidal and non-tidal wetlands, the first 25 feet from the mean high
water line or the ordinary high water line shall not contain principal or
accessory structures except where state and federal permits have been
obtained.
b. For tidal-influenced wetlands an additional 25-foot buffer zone is imposed
that shall not contain any principal structures (the total 50-foot buffer zone
is measured from the mean high water line).
c. A vegetated buffer must be established, either through retention of the
existing native vegetation, planting of new vegetation, or a combination of
both, within the required 25-foot or 50-foot buffer zones, provided that
appropriate permits can be secured from state and regional agencies.
Consistency: xX YES NO N/A
Analysis:
The tower shall not impact environmentally sensitive lands. As part of its FCC review, an
environmental review and report shall be generated as it relates to flora and fauna. While
wetlands exist on the parent tract, Crown located the tower to avoid impacting the
wetlands.
Policy 6.5 Borrow pit operations shall be permitted only where compatible with adjacent
land uses with an appropriate 50° or greater buffer to be determined at the time of special
exception, and when a reclamation plan has been approved by DEP pursuant to Chapter
378, Part IV, Florida Statutes. Removal of white sand from Okaloosa Island shall be
prohibited at all times. Also see Conservations Policy 3.3.
Consistency: YES NO x N/A
Analysis:
Policy 6.6 Development shall not be permitted seaward of the CCCL except where
authorized by the appropriate state and federal permits that allow certain types of
construction to occur to the extent that the natural storm buffering and protection
capability of the dunes is not diminished.
Consistency: YES NO _X NA
Analysis:
10
