READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Okaloosa County BOCC — December 4, 2012 — Internal Auditing Services — reading text
Part 3 of 6. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — 42-Internal Auditing Services.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
engagement and indicate whether each such person
is registered/licensed to practice as a certified public accountant in Florida. The
firm also should provide information on the government auditing experience of
each person, including information on relevant continuing professional
education for the past two (2) years and membership in professional
organizations relevant to the performance of this audit. The firm should provide
as much information as possible regarding the number, qualifications,
experience and training, including relevant continuing professional education,
of the specific staff to be assigned to this engagement. The firm also should
indicate how the quality of staff over the term of the agreement will be assured.
Engagement partners, managers, other supervisory staff and specialists may be
changed if those personnel leave the firm, are promoted or are assigned to
another office. These personnel may also be changed for other reasons with the
express prior written permission of Okaloosa County. However, in either case,
Okaloosa County retains the right to approve or reject replacements.
Consultants and firm specialists mentioned in response to this Request for
Proposals can only be changed with the express prior written permission of
Okaloosa County, which retains the right to approve or reject replacements.
Other audit personnel may be changed at the discretion of the proposer
provided the replacements have substantially the same or better qualifications
or experience.
b) Specific Audit Approach
i. Describe your firm’s experience in providing internal auditing services to local
government as well as other organizations. Describe the unique qualifications
of your firm to provide internal audit services to Okaloosa County, Florida.
ii. Describe your firm’s experience in auditing Electronic Date Processing Systems
(EDP) systems to include but not limited to accounting software systems, PC
based software applications, local area networks, etc.
iii. Describe how you will ensure the audit team assigned will have the necessary
knowledge and experience in County government internal controls.
iv. Describe your firm’s professional and technical resources which are available
to support the internal audit work.
v. The proposal should include a pricing structure (estimated hours and blended
hourly rate) for the entity wide review of internal controls and the risk
assessment work to be performed. Describe how you would approach risk
assessment at the County and how you would develop an internal audit plan
for the periodic review of the internal controls in the County departments
based on the risk assessment.
vi. The proposal should include a pricing structure (blended hourly rate) separate
from the entity wide review of internal controls and risk assessment for the
internal audit work based on the work plan.
c) Reporting
9
i. Document meeting availability for phone calls and face to face meetings.
Presence at Board meetings may be needed from time to time.
ii. Provide a sample internal audit report and discuss the type(s) of reports and
related audit information that is provided to the client.
d) Additional Information
i. All additional information the Firm deems as pertinent to their proposal must
be included in this section.
e) Pricing
i. The firm should provide the pricing for the services as detailed in specific audit
approach in this section.
ii. The pricing form included in Appendix J should be completed by the
proposer.
IV. Proposal Evaluation and Selection Criteria
A. Selection Committee
Submitted proposals will be evaluated by a Selection Committee comprised of Okaloosa
County, Florida Board of County Commissioners Management and the Clerk of the
Circuit Court or his designee. A representative from the County’s external auditing firm
will serve the selection committee as an ex officio non-voting member.
B. Evaluation Criteria
Proposals will initially be evaluated using two sets of criteria. Firms meeting the mandatory
criteria will have their proposals evaluated for technical qualifications as described in the
Proposal Format and Submittals Section. The following represent the principal selection
criteria, which may be considered during the evaluation process.
1. Mandatory Elements
a) The audit firm is independent and has no conflict of interest with regard to any
other work performed by the firm for Okaloosa County.
b) The audit firm is licensed to practice in Florida.
c) The audit firm's professional personnel have received adequate continuing
professional education within the preceding two (2) years.
d) The firm submits a copy of its most recent external quality control review report
and the firm has a record of quality audit work.
e) The firm adheres to the instructions in this Request for Proposals on preparing and
submitting the proposal.
10
2. Technical Qualifications
a) Expertise and Experience
i. The firm’s qualifications, experience, size and location.
ii. The firm’s past experience and performance on comparable internal audit
engagements.
iii. The quality of the firm's professional personnel to be assigned to the
engagement and the quality of the firm's management support personnel to
be available for technical consultation.
iv. References from persons knowledgeable of the Firm’s ability to fulfill the terms
of the contract.
v. Adequacy of Audit Approach, including the specific approach to the entity
wide review of internal controls and the risk assessment model.
vi. Cost
C. Oral Presentations
During the evaluation process, the Selection Committee may, at its discretion, request
any one or all firms to make oral presentations. Such presentations will provide firms with
an opportunity to answer any questions the Selection Committee may have on a firm's
proposal. Not all firms may be asked to make such oral presentations.
D. Final Selection
The Selection Committee will determine three finalists. After evaluation of the
qualifications herein and the submitted schedule of professional fees and expenses, the
Selection Committee will recommend the top-ranked firm for approval by the Okaloosa
County Board of County Commissioners.
V. RFP Procedures
A. General Requirements
1. Proposal Submission
Proposals must be submitted with all required submissions included. Failure to comply
may preclude consideration of the proposal. Each Proposer is responsible for full and
complete compliance with all laws, rules and regulations which may be applicable.
Proposers desiring to provide services as described herein shall submit proposals, an
original and seven (7) copies in a sealed envelope or box labeled on the outside of
the envelope or box, “Professional Internal Auditing Services,” and delivered not later
than 4:00 p.m., Friday, 2/22/2013, to the attention of Purchasing Department.
HAND DELIVER OR MAIL TO:
Okaloosa County Purchasing Department
Attn: Richard L Brannon
11
602-C North Pearl St.
Crestview, FL 32536
Note: Crestview, Florida is “not a next day guaranteed delivery location” by delivery
services.
LATE PROPOSALS WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED.
Upon submission, all proposals become the property of the County which has the
right to use any or all ideas presented in any proposal submitted in response to this
Request for Proposals, whether or not the proposal is accepted. The cost for
development of the written proposal and the oral presentation are entirely the
obligation of the Proposer and shall not be chargeable in any manner to Okaloosa
County.
2. Proposal Opening
Proposal Opening shall be public on the date and time specified on the proposal
form. It is the firm’s responsibility to assure that their proposal is delivered at the
proper time and place. Offers by telegram, facsimile, or telephone are not
acceptable. Note: Crestview is “not a next day guaranteed delivery location” by
delivery services.
3. Right to Waive & Reject
a) The Board, in its absolute discretion, may reject any proposal of a proposer that
has failed, in the opinion of the Board, to complete or perform an Okaloosa
County contracted project in a timely fashion or has failed in any other way, in
the opinion of the Board, to perform a prior contract in a satisfactory manner,
and has directed the Okaloosa County Purchasing Director to emphasize this
condition to potential proposers.
b) There is no obligation on the part of the County to award the proposal to the
lowest proposer, and the County reserves the right to award the proposal to
proposer submitting a responsive proposal with a resulting negotiated agreement
which is most advantageous and in the best interest of Okaloosa county, and to
reject any and all proposals or to waive any irregularity or technicality in
proposals received. Okaloosa County shall be the sole judge of the proposal and
the resulting negotiated agreement that is in its best interest and its decision shall
be final.
c) The Board of County Commissioners reserves the right to waive any informalities or
reject any and all proposals, in whole or part, to utilize any applicable state
contracts in lieu of or in addition to this proposal and to accept the proposal that
in its judgment will best serve the interest of the County.
d) The Board of County Commissioners specifically reserves the right to reject any
conditional proposal and will normally reject those which made it impossible to
determine the true amount of the proposal.
4. Disqualification of Proposers
12
Any of the following reasons may be considered as sufficient for the disqualification
of a proposer and the rejection of his proposal or proposals:
a) More than one proposal for the same work from an individual, firm or corporation
under the same or different name.
b) Evidence that the proposer has a financial interest in the firm of another proposer
for the same work.
c) Evidence of collusion among proposers. Participants in such collusion will receive
no recognition as proposers for any future work of the County until such
participant shall have been reinstated as a qualified proposer.
d) Uncompleted work which in the judgment of the County might hinder or prevent
the prompt completion of additional work if awarded.
e) Failure to pay or satisfactorily settle all bills due for labor and material on former
contracts in force at the time of advertisement of proposals.
f) Default
