READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE

Okaloosa County BOCC — May 17, 2016 — 2016 Emergency Solutions Grant App — reading text

Part 7 of 11. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.

2016 Emergency Solutions Grant App — extracted reading text

Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Known limitations

Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.

3 BAY 47 1,152 28 162 48 1,437 4 BRADFORD <11 220 <11 28 <11 255 5 BREVARD 131 1,425 44 226 19 1,845 6 BROWARD 481 1,425 59 267 38 2,270 7 CALHOUN 0 72 <11 0 <11 76 8 CHARLOTTE 58 376 12 55 <11 508 9 CITRUS 57 226 25 16 17 341 10 CLAY 82 895 16 105 <11 1,102 11 COLLIER 90 551 <11 56 75 779 12 COLUMBIA 64 447 16 52 <11 588 13 DADE 1,086 2,571 162 212 0 4,031 14 DESOTO 0 316 44 <11 <11 368 15 DIXIE 0 59 0 <11 0 62 16 DUVAL 352 1,536 19 166 93 2,166 17 ESCAMBIA 152 1,621 <11 155 0 1,938 18 FLAGLER 23 513 24 52 <11 616 19 FRANKLIN <11 194 25 <11 0 225 20 GADSDEN 27 468 <11 19 <11 530 21 GILCHRIST <11 <11 <11 <11 0 <11 22 GLADES <11 56 <11 0 0 61 23 GULF <11 13 0 0 0 15 24 HAMILTON <11 215 0 34 <11 251 25 HARDEE <11 189 0 <11 0 200 26 HENDRY 18 281 <11 <11 <11 309 27 HERNANDO 52 408 19 26 <11 510 28 HIGHLANDS <11 425 11 <11 <11 461 29 HILLSBOROUGH 420 2,901 99 383 <11 3,811 30 HOLMES 0 96 <11 <11 <11 104 31 INDIAN RIVER 122 210 <11 28 <11 366 32 JACKSON <11 121 13 <11 0 143 33 JEFFERSON 0 <11 0 0 0 <11 34 LAFAYETTE 0 104 104 0 0 208 35 LAKE 62 2,047 24 208 75 2,416 36 LEE 262 742 33 183 36 1,256 37 LEON 193 539 <11 47 <11 797 38 LEVY 23 185 <11 <11 <11 216 39 LIBERTY 0 50 0 0 0 50 40 MADISON 0 177 65 <11 <11 244 2016-17 Emergency Solutions Grant Application 37 41 MANATEE 98 1,494 37 203 33 1,865 42 MARION 244 2,112 38 274 17 2,685 43 MARTIN 123 34 <11 21 0 179 44 MONROE 119 301 19 13 <11 456 45 NASSAU 25 407 36 16 0 484 46 OKALOOSA 73 362 11 38 <11 487 47 OKEECHOBEE 0 465 <11 0 0 468 48 ORANGE 414 4,741 64 1,542 39 6,800 49 OSCEOLA 86 3,414 117 1,027 28 4,672 50 PALM BEACH 352 2,492 113 275 518 3,750 51 PASCO 264 1,588 59 208 71 2,190 52 PINELLAS 631 2,547 45 481 60 3,764 53 POLK 351 2,586 179 409 <11 3,531 53D LAKE WALES <11 207 25 19 0 259 54 PUTNAM 71 562 26 15 0 674 55 ST. JOHNS 114 589 16 90 0 809 56 ST. LUCIE 65 505 23 60 <11 663 57 SANTA ROSA 33 1,567 14 36 46 1,696 58 SARASOTA 116 599 <11 133 29 885 59 SEMINOLE 136 1,417 29 401 11 1,994 60 SUMTER 22 122 <11 <11 0 153 61 SUWANNEE 61 266 16 11 0 354 62 TAYLOR <11 72 12 <11 0 94 63 UNION 0 121 0 0 0 121 64 VOLUSIA 180 1,791 38 304 <11 2,322 65 WAKULLA 0 37 <11 0 0 40 66 WALTON <11 259 <11 13 11 294 67 WASHINGTON <11 172 <11 <11 <11 190 68 DEAF/BLIND <11 17 <11 <11 0 20 69 WASH SPECIAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 71 FL VIRTUAL <11 29 <11 24 0 61 72 FAU LAB SCH <11 <11 0 <11 0 <11 73 FSU LAB SCH 0 <11 0 0 0 <11 74 FAMU LAB SCH 0 <11 0 0 0 <11 75 UF LAB SCH 0 0 0 0 0 0 STATE TOTAL 7,555 54,299 1,873 8,210 1,385 73,322 A (Shelters), B (Doubled-up,) D (Cars/Parks/Campgrounds/Substandard/Bus/Train/Public Places), E (Hotels/Motels), LEGEND: F (Awaiting Foster Care Placement) Yes (Homeless and Unaccompanied Youth), No (Homeless, but NOT Unaccompanied Youth) 2016-17 Emergency Solutions Grant Application 38 Exhibit 8 CoC Certification Form 2016 Emergency Solutions Grant This certification MUST be executed by and provided by another officially designated entity to act on behalf of the CoC. The designated lead agency, as an applicant, is prohibited from certifying the capacity and performance criteria on its own grant proposal. Other designated, independent third party entities authorized to sign the certification may include the following: 1. The Governing Board of the CoC planning area, so long as the board is not also the governing body for the lead agency entity submitting the grant proposal. 2. The designated third party grant review committee established by the CoC membership, with the chair of the committee authorized in wiring to sign and verify the scoring criteria materials for the lead agency’s grant proposal. 3. Action by the full membership for the CoC at a publicly noticed meeting, and documented by a formal vote of the members to certify the grant proposal to be submitted by the lead agency. This action must be documented with the written minutes of the meeting, the vote, and the clear designation of the person authorized to sign on behalf of the CoC. 1. The total number of persons who are homeless (sheltered and unsheltered) in the CoC planning area from the January 2016 point in time count is . 2. The applicant, , is currently collecting data on clients assisted to the continuum’s HMIS data system; and, THE DATA QUALITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS the standards prescribed by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Total Service Providers in the CoC Area _________ Indicate the # of providers who: Provide Data Yes _______ No _______ Meets/Exceeds Standards Yes _______ No _______ 3. The applicant, , has executed written agreements with the CoC service providers to assist those individuals and households referred from the coordinated assessment system. This certification must be supported by a copy of the written agreement that clearly delineates the roles and responsibilities of the applicant and each sub- provider of services attached behind this form. Total number of services providers in the CoC _________ Number of written agreement submitted ______________ 2016-17 Emergency Solutions Grant Application 39 4. The applicant, , has service providers in its area that have demonstrated performance in coordinating with and securing services and benefits for the individuals and households being assisted from the community network of

Download this text file with its original spacing ↓