READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Okaloosa County BOCC — May 17, 2016 — 2016 Emergency Solutions Grant App — reading text
Part 7 of 11. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
2016 Emergency Solutions Grant App — extracted reading text
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Known limitations
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
3 BAY 47 1,152 28 162 48 1,437
4 BRADFORD <11 220 <11 28 <11 255
5 BREVARD 131 1,425 44 226 19 1,845
6 BROWARD 481 1,425 59 267 38 2,270
7 CALHOUN 0 72 <11 0 <11 76
8 CHARLOTTE 58 376 12 55 <11 508
9 CITRUS 57 226 25 16 17 341
10 CLAY 82 895 16 105 <11 1,102
11 COLLIER 90 551 <11 56 75 779
12 COLUMBIA 64 447 16 52 <11 588
13 DADE 1,086 2,571 162 212 0 4,031
14 DESOTO 0 316 44 <11 <11 368
15 DIXIE 0 59 0 <11 0 62
16 DUVAL 352 1,536 19 166 93 2,166
17 ESCAMBIA 152 1,621 <11 155 0 1,938
18 FLAGLER 23 513 24 52 <11 616
19 FRANKLIN <11 194 25 <11 0 225
20 GADSDEN 27 468 <11 19 <11 530
21 GILCHRIST <11 <11 <11 <11 0 <11
22 GLADES <11 56 <11 0 0 61
23 GULF <11 13 0 0 0 15
24 HAMILTON <11 215 0 34 <11 251
25 HARDEE <11 189 0 <11 0 200
26 HENDRY 18 281 <11 <11 <11 309
27 HERNANDO 52 408 19 26 <11 510
28 HIGHLANDS <11 425 11 <11 <11 461
29 HILLSBOROUGH 420 2,901 99 383 <11 3,811
30 HOLMES 0 96 <11 <11 <11 104
31 INDIAN RIVER 122 210 <11 28 <11 366
32 JACKSON <11 121 13 <11 0 143
33 JEFFERSON 0 <11 0 0 0 <11
34 LAFAYETTE 0 104 104 0 0 208
35 LAKE 62 2,047 24 208 75 2,416
36 LEE 262 742 33 183 36 1,256
37 LEON 193 539 <11 47 <11 797
38 LEVY 23 185 <11 <11 <11 216
39 LIBERTY 0 50 0 0 0 50
40 MADISON 0 177 65 <11 <11 244
2016-17 Emergency Solutions Grant Application 37
41 MANATEE 98 1,494 37 203 33 1,865
42 MARION 244 2,112 38 274 17 2,685
43 MARTIN 123 34 <11 21 0 179
44 MONROE 119 301 19 13 <11 456
45 NASSAU 25 407 36 16 0 484
46 OKALOOSA 73 362 11 38 <11 487
47 OKEECHOBEE 0 465 <11 0 0 468
48 ORANGE 414 4,741 64 1,542 39 6,800
49 OSCEOLA 86 3,414 117 1,027 28 4,672
50 PALM BEACH 352 2,492 113 275 518 3,750
51 PASCO 264 1,588 59 208 71 2,190
52 PINELLAS 631 2,547 45 481 60 3,764
53 POLK 351 2,586 179 409 <11 3,531
53D LAKE WALES <11 207 25 19 0 259
54 PUTNAM 71 562 26 15 0 674
55 ST. JOHNS 114 589 16 90 0 809
56 ST. LUCIE 65 505 23 60 <11 663
57 SANTA ROSA 33 1,567 14 36 46 1,696
58 SARASOTA 116 599 <11 133 29 885
59 SEMINOLE 136 1,417 29 401 11 1,994
60 SUMTER 22 122 <11 <11 0 153
61 SUWANNEE 61 266 16 11 0 354
62 TAYLOR <11 72 12 <11 0 94
63 UNION 0 121 0 0 0 121
64 VOLUSIA 180 1,791 38 304 <11 2,322
65 WAKULLA 0 37 <11 0 0 40
66 WALTON <11 259 <11 13 11 294
67 WASHINGTON <11 172 <11 <11 <11 190
68 DEAF/BLIND <11 17 <11 <11 0 20
69 WASH SPECIAL 0 0 0 0 0 0
71 FL VIRTUAL <11 29 <11 24 0 61
72 FAU LAB SCH <11 <11 0 <11 0 <11
73 FSU LAB SCH 0 <11 0 0 0 <11
74 FAMU LAB SCH 0 <11 0 0 0 <11
75 UF LAB SCH 0 0 0 0 0 0
STATE TOTAL 7,555 54,299 1,873 8,210 1,385 73,322
A (Shelters), B (Doubled-up,) D (Cars/Parks/Campgrounds/Substandard/Bus/Train/Public Places), E (Hotels/Motels),
LEGEND:
F (Awaiting Foster Care Placement)
Yes (Homeless and Unaccompanied Youth), No (Homeless, but NOT Unaccompanied Youth)
2016-17 Emergency Solutions Grant Application 38
Exhibit 8
CoC Certification Form
2016 Emergency Solutions Grant
This certification MUST be executed by and provided by another officially designated entity to
act on behalf of the CoC. The designated lead agency, as an applicant, is prohibited from certifying
the capacity and performance criteria on its own grant proposal.
Other designated, independent third party entities authorized to sign the certification may include
the following:
1. The Governing Board of the CoC planning area, so long as the board is not also the
governing body for the lead agency entity submitting the grant proposal.
2. The designated third party grant review committee established by the CoC
membership, with the chair of the committee authorized in wiring to sign and verify the
scoring criteria materials for the lead agency’s grant proposal.
3. Action by the full membership for the CoC at a publicly noticed meeting, and
documented by a formal vote of the members to certify the grant proposal to be
submitted by the lead agency. This action must be documented with the written minutes
of the meeting, the vote, and the clear designation of the person authorized to sign on
behalf of the CoC.
1. The total number of persons who are homeless (sheltered and unsheltered) in the CoC planning
area from the January 2016 point in time count is .
2. The applicant, , is currently collecting data
on clients assisted to the continuum’s HMIS data system; and, THE DATA QUALITY
MEETS OR EXCEEDS the standards prescribed by the U.S. Department of Housing and
Urban Development.
Total Service Providers in the CoC Area _________
Indicate the # of providers who:
Provide Data Yes _______ No _______
Meets/Exceeds Standards Yes _______ No _______
3. The applicant, , has executed written agreements
with the CoC service providers to assist those individuals and households referred from the
coordinated assessment system. This certification must be supported by a copy of the written
agreement that clearly delineates the roles and responsibilities of the applicant and each sub-
provider of services attached behind this form.
Total number of services providers in the CoC _________
Number of written agreement submitted ______________
2016-17 Emergency Solutions Grant Application 39
4. The applicant, , has service providers in its area that
have demonstrated performance in coordinating with and securing services and benefits for the
individuals and households being assisted from the community network of
