READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE
Fort Walton Beach Council agenda — 11-14-06 (regular) — reading text
Part 35 of 52. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.
Machine-extracted text — fwb-13252-original.pdf
Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed
Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.
L~...
f"""..-"'
f.'
t U:::
S Ub U-,.; J. ot' V A. III . ....._..._.
cc: 2/-
1 a-p
Subject: Staff Recommendation to Municipal Planning Board Oct 6~ 006 Refer" ec~
c::>
05-43- C" '
i
I
0
To City Manager
1. City Staff recommended to Chairman and Members of the MPB on Sept 27 2006 '~
that eleven conditions be applied to the Conditional use permit for Santa Rosa N
Sound Complex. The MPB Board approved staffs recommendation.
2. As a minority owner of sac and a lessor of this property I strongly object to
paragraph 3 page 3 of staff's recommendation.
3. The currently existing building is 25 years old and has been battered.by 5 hurricanes
and numerous tropical storms. The southern most portion of this building will be
razed before years end. The parking lot and building foot print was to continue as a
boatyard work area. However~Staff's using the Shoreline Protection Zone
legislation as a method to restrict the use of private property in a way that is contrary
in my opinion to the intent of the law. Staff states in Sun King Office lot conditional
use study that no additional building or imperious surfaces be sited in the 50ft wide
SPZ. That is fully understood by me. However Staff then states nor may any
boatyard operations be conducted in the SPZ". That single statement takes away
5000 plus Sq ft of my boatyards usable space. Not doing " boatyard work" in a
boatyard is like not farming on a fann~not selling cars on a car lot,or not providing
religion from a church.
4. It is common knowledge in the marine industry that boatyards are a dying industry.
The State of FL last year past legislation giving grants to boatyards hit by hunicane
and condo developers. My portion of that grant is $ 145000.00. The taking of Five
thousand sq ft of usable boatyard makes little sense. I am told by staff the most
cogent explanation for this " taking" is to reduce pollution. If that 1ruly is the reason
then cite the polluters. If I am one then cite me. Don' t take my boatyard property!
I will gladly discuss this issue with you and Staff. I am adamant in my opinion
that Staff is terribly wrong in the use of the SPZ to take away the use of private property
by declaring a ' NO use area.
Jim Tucker
MUNICtPAl PLANN.tNG BOARD
OCTOBER 5, 2006 MEETING
AGENDA ITEM IH..A.
MPB CASE#05-43-CU
CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST FOR A CONmTtONAl USE PERMIT FOR A
MARfNA.THE REQUEST IS LOCATED-AT 38 MIRACLE STRIP PARKWAY SW. REQUESTED
BY BRIAN J'. lAMBERT. AGENT FOR SANTA ROSA SOUND COMPLEX. LtC. OWNER..CDS
(
STAFF)SEE
( BACKUP)
I
CITY OF FORT WALTON BEACH, FLORIDA
MEMORANDUM
DATE: September 27, 2006
TO: Chairman and Members Municipal Planning Board ( MPB)
THROUGH: Missy McKim, CDS Director
FROM: Len Mitchell, Planning Manager ~
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit for a Marina- Requested by Brian J. Lambert,
Agent for Santa Rosa Sound Complex, L. L. C., owner. (MPB Case #05- 43-
CU)
ISSUE:
Conditional Use Permit for Marina at 38 Miracle Strip Parkway SW. Requested by Brian J.
Lambert, Agent for Santa Rosa SoLind Complex, L. L. C., owner
BACKGROUND:
The present Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Maps ( FLUM) were adopted by the City in
August 2000. The FLUM designated the area where the request is located MUW-24, Mixed- use
Waterfront-24.
Conditional uses may be approved by the Municipal Planning Board ( MPB), approved with
conditions or disapproved after consideration at a public hearing.
The public participation process requires that the proposed amendment be considered
by the MPB at a public hearing after posting the request site, legal notice placed in the
newspaper and notices mailed to affected property owners within 300 feel All of the
public participation requirements for this request have been accomplished within the
timeframes prescribed by the Land Development Code.
The following are the review criteria for a conditional use permit for which the Municipal
Planning Board may issue upon making findings regarding the application as toe whether and
the extent to which the criteria are met:
a. The conditional use is consistent with the
goals, objectives and policies of the
Comprehensive Plan and Neighborhood Plan, if one exists for the area in which
the property is located;
b. The conditional use is consistent with the character of the immediate vicinity of
the land proposed for development, and designed so that it is consistent with the
harmonious development of the zoning district in which it is proposed;
c. The design of the proposed condi
. tional use will minimize any detrimental
effects on neighboring properties, relative to the following design features:
1) Architectural design of the structures.
2) Open space and view corridors.
3) Fencing and screening.
4) Noise reduction.
5) Sign and light control.
6) Landscaping.
7) Storm drainage.
8) Sanitation collection.
9) Police and fire protection.
10) On and off-site traffic control.
11) Off-street parking and loading.
12) Other matters relevant to assuring that the proposed development si~e
fosters desirable conditions and compatibility with the existing environment
d. The proposed conditional use will have no adverse effect on the health, safety,
morals, general welfare of permitted uses located in the same or adjacent zoning
district as the proposed conditional use;
e. There areadequate public facilities and services available to serve the development
proposed pursuant to the Concurrency Management System Element of the
Comprehensive Plan;
f. The proposed conditional use will not require signage or exterior lighting that will cause
glare or will adversely impact area traffic safety;
g. There is adequate ingress and egress to the proposed conditional use, and it is
designed so as to minimize the curb cuts thereby reducing traffic congestion on the city' s
roads;
h. There is adequate provision for traffic movement, both vehicular and pedestrian
internally and externally;
i.The proposed conditional use is consistent with the requirements of the LOC and all
applicable local, state and federal regulations;
j. The structures and uses associated with the conditional use complies with all
additional standards imposed on it by the comprehensive plan authorizing such use and
all other applicable requirements of the LOC; and
k. Any other conditions as may be stipulated and made a requirement in granting any
application for a conditional use, when it is considered necessary to further the intent
to protect the health, safety and general welfare including but not limited to 1) limitation
on the hours of business operation and 2) limitation on the number of occupants at
anyone time.
DISCUSSION:
Page 2
Staff has prepared a Conditional Use Technical Report which includes the application and the
applicant's narrative responses and exhibits including a site plan entitled " Sun King Office Lot
Conditional Use Study".
Through the conditional use process the Municipal Planning Board may approve applications for
conditional use if the use is found to be appropriate based on the criteria specified in the Land
Development Code. The Board may also place conditions on the proposed use If it feels the
conditions are necessary to accomplish the purpose of the comprehensive plan and the LDC to
prevent or minimize any adverse effects the request may have upon the public and the
neighborhood.
The applicant has provided narrative supporting the application including notice that The Boat
Marina, lying east of the request site, will lease the property and operate the proposed marina.
The applicant noted that there are 39 existing wet slips on the submerged part of the request
site.
Staff has no concerns regarding land use compatibility with adjacent land uses since The Boat
Marina lies to the east and a transient lodging facility lies to the west The request site is one of
few sites in the City where a marinas operation would be considered appropriate. Marinas are
only permitted by conditional use in the MUW-24 District because there are commercial and
residential uses permitted as principal uses in the district.
The applicant plans to demolish all of the existing 2- story office building except the 1, 344 s.f.
nearest to US 98/ Miracle Strip Parkway. That portion will be renovated and used as storage,
electrical and water supply and restrooms. Five parking spaces have been provided for that
building including a handicapped accessible space.
Staff recommends the following Conditions be applied to the Development Order:
1) The Site Plan "Sun King Office Lot Conditional Use Study" E
( xhibit 3) shall be the
approved plan for the development of the conditional use subject to review and approval
by the Community Redevelopment Agency and City Council.
2) The approved marina use includes all uses specified in the term " marina" as currently
defined in Section 12. 20. Volume IV, LDC.
3) In no case may any additional buildings or impervious surfaces be sited on the
minimum 50 feet wide Shoreline Protection Zone (SPZ) shown on the "Sun King Office
Lot Conditional Use Study"nor may any " boatyard operations" be conducted in the
designated SPZ.
4) The applicant shall submit a Landscape Plan meeting the requirements of Section
12.460. 12, Volume IV. LDC, and consistent with the approved Site Plan referenced in
Condition 3 above, prior to issuance of a building permit.
5) The subject property shall be subject to
