READ ALONGSIDE THE SOURCE

Okaloosa County BOCC — December 4, 2012 — reading text

Part 54 of 71. These parts divide the reading text for browsing; they are not the source document's page numbers.

Machine-extracted text — 01-Agenda Packet.pdf

Machine-extracted OCR text · Review label: Machine produced / unreviewed

Compare this copy with the preserved source. Review labels describe the recorded status of this file; they do not guarantee that the text is error-free. Spacing and line breaks are retained, with long lines wrapped to fit the screen.

66,400 66,400 DEPUTY - S.R.O. Baker School 70,811 70,811 DEPUTY - S.R.O. Shalimar Elementary 75,406 75,406 DEPUTY - S.R.O. Shoal River Middle 63,273 63,273 DEPUTY - S.R.O. Okaloosa Academy NORTH 71,438 71,438 DEPUTY - S.R.O. Bluewater Elementary 62,646 62,646 DEPUTY - S.R.O. Pryor Middle 68,948 68,948 DEPUTY - S.R.O. Okaloosa Academy SOUTH 59,525 59,525 DEPUTY - S.R.O. Brunner Middle 64,547 64,547 DEPUTY - S.R.O. Meigs Middle 62,661 62,661 DEPUTY - S.R.O. Niceville High 54,201 54,201 DEPUTY - S.R.O. Silver Sands School 54,729 54,729 DEPUTY - S.R.O. Ruckel Middle 61,079 61,079 DEPUTY - S.R.O. Edge Elementary 61,166 61,166 DEPUTY - S.R.O. South Side School 67,595 67,595 DEPUTY - S.R.O. Plew Elementary 58,144 58,144 DEPUTY - S.R.O. Kenwood Elementary 67,894 67,894 DEPUTY - S.R.O. Northwood Elementary 58,869 58,869 DEPUTY - S.R.O. Walker Elementary 67,082 67,082 DEPUTY - S.R.O. Edwins Elementary 58,471 58,471 DEPUTY - S.R.O. Bob Sikes Elementary 56,889 56,889 DEPUTY - S.R.O. Riverside Elementary 58,569 58,569 DEPUTY - S.R.O. Wright Elementary 55,489 55,489 DEPUTY - S.R.O. Elliot Point Elementary 59,869 59,869 DEPUTY - S.R.O. Longwood Elementary 56,120 56,120 DEPUTY - S.R.O. Liza Jackson School 58,311 58,311 DEPUTY - S.R.O. Florosa Elementary 54,548 54,548 Cost Breakdown for remainder of 2012-13 School Year DEPUTY - S.R.O. Antioch Elementary 55,176 55,176 Per SRO 1/2 Share 1/2 Year Remaining 2,686,882 944,944 1,741,938 Veh $ 3,125 26 New Positions Operations $ 16,831 $ 66,998 Personnel $ 66,998 $ 86,954 $ 43,477 $ 21,738 Packet Pg. 369 $ 2,260,794 $ 1,130,397 $ 565,198 Each 9.1.a.b Attachment: SRO Re-Org 2013 Cost Details (1311 : Continued Discussion Concerning School Resource Officers) 9.1.a.c Packet Pg. 370 Attachment: SRO Reassignment Info (1311 : Continued Discussion Concerning School Resource Officers) 9.1.a.d Packet Pg. 371 Attachment: SRO Agreement (1311 : Continued Discussion Concerning School Resource Officers) 9.1.a.d Packet Pg. 372 Attachment: SRO Agreement (1311 : Continued Discussion Concerning School Resource Officers) 9.1.a.d Packet Pg. 373 Attachment: SRO Agreement (1311 : Continued Discussion Concerning School Resource Officers) 9.1.a.d Packet Pg. 374 Attachment: SRO Agreement (1311 : Continued Discussion Concerning School Resource Officers) 9.1.a.d Packet Pg. 375 Attachment: SRO Agreement (1311 : Continued Discussion Concerning School Resource Officers) 9.1.a.d Packet Pg. 376 Attachment: SRO Agreement (1311 : Continued Discussion Concerning School Resource Officers) 9.1.a.d Packet Pg. 377 Attachment: SRO Agreement (1311 : Continued Discussion Concerning School Resource Officers) 9.1.a.d Packet Pg. 378 Attachment: SRO Agreement (1311 : Continued Discussion Concerning School Resource Officers) 9.1.a.d Packet Pg. 379 Attachment: SRO Agreement (1311 : Continued Discussion Concerning School Resource Officers) 9.1.b BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA REQUEST DATE: January 22, 2013 TO: Honorable Chairman and Members of the Board FROM: Major J.D. Peacock, Sheriff's Office SUBJECT: Request Approval of LETF Disbursement A submission by the Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Celebration Committee for funding from the Law Enforcement Trust Fund is attached for Board review and consideration. Packet Pg. 380 9.1.b.a Packet Pg. 381 Attachment: MLK Request for LETF (1310 : Request Approval of LETF Disbursement) 9.1.b.a Packet Pg. 382 Attachment: MLK Request for LETF (1310 : Request Approval of LETF Disbursement) 9.1.b.a Packet Pg. 383 Attachment: MLK Request for LETF (1310 : Request Approval of LETF Disbursement) 9.1.b.a Packet Pg. 384 Attachment: MLK Request for LETF (1310 : Request Approval of LETF Disbursement) 9.2.a BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA REQUEST DATE: January 22, 2013 TO: Honorable Chairman and Members of the Board FROM: Kay Godwin SUBJECT: Internal Auditing Services DEPARTMENT: Human Resources BCC DISTRICT: All STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Commissioner Kelly Windes proposed enhancing internal auditing functions for the BCC by hiring a qualified CPA firm (or employee) to provide these services. A work group consisting of County Administrator, Jim Curry; County Attorney, John Dowd; Clerk of Circuit Court, Don Howard; County Commissioner, Kelly Windes; Angela Balent; Human Resources Director, Kay Godwin; and Human Resources Manager, GinNeal McVay, met to review options for providing internal auditing services for the BCC. There are statutory lines of authority designating the Clerk of Circuit Court as auditor of all county funds. Mr. Dowd provided a case where Alachua County created an internal auditing department to conduct post- audit functions, and the court found that to be improper, although hiring an independent auditing firm for this purpose would have been permissible. The work group discussed utilizing an outside firm as opposed to hiring a county employee. Other options discussed were funding another internal auditor within the Clerk of Circuit Court's Office or hiring an internal auditor for the BCC who would review only policies and procedures. A Request For Proposals has been drafted, and is provided for the Board's consideration. It is anticipated that a three-year contract would be executed, with the option of a three-year extension, although the Board would annually review the proposed work plan and anticipated costs to determine whether continued funding would be provided for auditing services. Should the Board wish to proceed with this option, a committee should be appointed to review proposals and make a recommendation to the Board. The scope of work for an outside firm would be to first conduct an overall county fraud risk assessment followed by the development of a control risk assessment and an audit work plan. The services would also include recommending fraud prevention measures as well as acting as the Board's Auditor General Office (AGO) compliance officer following deficiencies recently noted in the

Download this text file with its original spacing ↓